Steve Harmon is on trial for a murder that took place during a robbery. Steve claims to not be involved and the evidence shows he may have somewhat been involved. Though he could not have killed the man. With help from all of the evidence shown below a verdict is reached. In the trial of Steve Harmon, Steve worked as a lookout but was not guilty for the murder of Alguinaldo Nesbitt. Harman is not guilty because Mrs. Henry states that she doesn't see Steve, He didn't hold the gun, and Steve Harmon
Words: 512 - Pages: 3
A pretrial identification that I believe is unduly suggestive is a showup. A showup is “a pretrial identification procedure in which only one suspect and a witness are brought together” (Hall, 2015, p. 508). The reason why I feel that a showup is unduly suggestive is because you are only showing the witness one suspect and not several potential suspects. I feel that in the witness or victims mind, if they only see one suspect, then in their minds, they feel that the person they are viewing must be
Words: 559 - Pages: 3
power is to add a more supervision to the making of the plea deal so that coercion is prevented and ensuring the defendant is receiving a fair deal. One way to do this is to create a “plea jury” to oversee the terms and conditions of the deal and to decide whether it is just and fair (Neyfakh, 2015). If plea juries were implemented in today’s court system, it would decrease the sentence disparities that one’s sees among the people of color versus people of non-color. If the public was to oversee these
Words: 831 - Pages: 4
Identify and explain the most significant flaw in the law and how you propose that it be corrected. The Justice System today is lacks transparency; In this case transparency may mean different things. Some people view transparency as having the right to monitor what is going on in their surroundings, while others used it as strategy to make citizens have their rights. In most case the court looks at those affected in a case and the result they received from the case because most of the appointed
Words: 1218 - Pages: 5
A recent Supreme Court case in which a juvenile being tried as an adult was brought up was Miller v. Alabama. It's premise was that Evan Miller, a fourteen year old boy, along with his accomplice, Colby Smith, set fire to their neighbors trailer from whom they had purchased drugs. The neighbor and owner of the trailer, Cole Cannon, had fallen asleep after a drinking session with both Miller and Smith and only woke to find that he was being robbed. After noticing this, both Miller and Smith proceeded
Words: 255 - Pages: 2
As the article above states, the Tom Robinson and Mayella Ewell Trial has concluded in sentencing the black, guilty man to death. He was dispatched to the county jail, just to later attempt to escape. The guilty man was shot dead while escaping. I, being a qualified editorial writer, think that it was incredibly ignorant and egocentric act. He was proven guilty, and sentenced to time in jail. I, and many others, believe that he should have paid the price for his expensive and abusive crime. The fact
Words: 345 - Pages: 2
1. Flinn’s defense is invalid. The law does not care for nor allow for ignorance as a defense. Even though Flinn claims that he did not intend to break the law he is not exempt from prosecution. Flinn had the duty to determine what legal documentation he needed to begin his business. If convicted, Flinn’s ignorance of the law may be taken into account and instead of facing incarceration, he may face forfeiture, and fines. 2. Yes. Northwestern Bell committed the acts of bribery and improper political
Words: 559 - Pages: 3
There are several potential defenses to the Plaintiffs claims in this case. First, we understand that prior to them entering the undeveloped portion of the property, the Plaintiffs were aware that Lee Ricks, IV may have been intoxicated. They also were negligent in either not wearing restraint devices while in the Jeep, or alternatively, had knowledge that the Jeep did not have restraint devices available by the time the Jeep entered the undeveloped portion of the property. They would have also
Words: 883 - Pages: 4
“Judgement at Stoney Creek” is a novel written to tell the story of the 21-year-old woman who was struck and killed by a vehicle in her ninth month of pregnancy. When the request for an inquest is initially denied, the people of Stoney Creek and even some of Vanderhoof fight for an inquest. Throughout the novel, it also highlights many times when the justice system failed the Aboriginal peoples. On July 2, the streets of Vanderhoof were full of laughter and happiness as they were celebrating fifty
Words: 320 - Pages: 2
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Weatherford Texas Hospital Company, LLC d/b/a Weatherford Regional Medical Center (“Hospital”) files its Answer to Joseph Daniels, D.O. d/b/a Southwest Orthopedic Associates’ (“Practice”) Counterclaim as follows: I. GENERAL DENIAL 1. Hospital generally denies each and every, all and singular, the material allegations of Practice’s Counterclaim and demands strict proof thereof by a preponderance of the evidence. II. SPECIFIC DENIALS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 2. Hospital specifically
Words: 345 - Pages: 2
