...Euthanasia Mister Speaker, I now move the bill be read a second time. The legislation of euthanasia is highly supported based on the rights, practical and philosophical arguments. Voluntary euthanasia is a respected form of death that should be a right to an individual if they have no quality or purpose to live. The new bill would eliminate the suffering of a distressful death, both physically and psychologically. The individual would pass with pride, dignity and would be remembered as the person they are, not who they once were. The patients that would receive the lethal injection would be on the verge of death by being diagnosed with incurable medical conditions. Mr Speaker, euthanasia is legal in countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Columbia and Albania and should now be legislated in Australia....
Words: 613 - Pages: 3
...By definition, assisted dying (also termed as assisted suicide) is “a form of euthanasia where a person wishes to commit suicide but is unable to perform the act, generally as a result of a current physical disability. Accordingly, assisted suicide requires another person to provide direct or indirect physical means to bring about death” . As it stands, legalising assisted dying is such a controversial topic, especially in the United Kingdom. Current legislation in favour of assisted dying is limited to two states in America, and a few liberal countries such as Switzerland. It could be argued that assisted dying should remain illegal for numerous reasons, for example, sanctity of life. In contrary, it can be said that the weightier argument is that assisted dying...
Words: 909 - Pages: 4
...In Australia, at current euthanasia is illegal across all states and territories. However, the law is always changing, in the past there has been several bills to go through parliament in different states that haven’t succeeded, such as the recent bill drafted in Tasmania by the Greens leader Cassy O’Connor, who drafted a bill in May 2017 called the Assisted Dying Bill, however, this bill did not get passed. The Terminally Ill Act 1995 was enforced into the Northern Territory and after 3 months of operating and after a few people had been euthanised the Howard Government had overturned the act. Also, recently in May 2017, a woman in New South Wales (NSW) suffering from Neuron Motor Disease spoke up and wanted to have a right in deciding when to end her life. She claimed that she felt “trapped in her own body” as she was incapable of speaking properly. Her family stated that they did not want her to do die, but were respectful of her choice, as it was greatly affecting her physical and mental health. A bill was then drafted through parliament in NSW, with the purpose of allowing the terminally ill to voluntarily die, this bill consisted of the regulations that a person must be in chronic pain, suffering from a terminal illness and likely to die within the next 12 months (Andrew Leeson, 30/5/17)....
Words: 858 - Pages: 4
...Euthanasia could be socially acceptable for patients with chronic illnesses because it is an escape from pain felt from the illness, a decision made between the patient and family members, and the moral consideration of the physician to help end the life of a loved one. The decision by the patient to end their life to relieve their chronic pain and suffering from their illness should be based on knowledge and not emotions. Patients with cancer suffer pain from chemotherapy and radiation. The patient could become ill and unable to function in their everyday life. Choosing to end their life could be a choice made by the patient because of the pain and sickness that they are feeling. The patient should research their options before making...
Words: 371 - Pages: 2
...explosive, debilitating head pain has dominated Edel Wignell’s life. Earlier this year, the Melbourne woman reached out to ABC News to share her positive view on euthanasia. "The pain doesn't go away. So I'd rather be dead. I've had a wonderful life, it's not as though I'm depressed," Ms Wignell said. "I'm 78, nearly 79, I think it's time." She wishes for a doctor to legally assist her death; however the government refuses her pleas. Every instinct tells us to push on, to continue trying, to keep on living. So life would always be the only choice right? Envision that you have awoken in a hospital bed. You are terminally ill, the agonizing pain will never leave, and you cannot stand to rot away in this unhomely environment, what are your options? None, you would be forced to endure it, for decades even. For too long have ill people and their families suffered, it is time for you, the leaders of our country, to make euthanasia legal....
Words: 562 - Pages: 3
...Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patient's intolerable and incurable suffering. Physician-assisted suicide occurs when a physician facilitates a patient's death by providing the necessary means and/or information to enable the patient to perform the life-ending act (AMA Policy on End-of-Life). Due to the fact that this is a controversial subject, it is not widely accepted by many. As of right now, euthanasia is only legal in the Netherlands, Belgium, Colombia and Luxembourg, and assisted suicide is only legal in Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Albania and in the American states of Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico Washington, and Montana. We control the course of our own...
Words: 1376 - Pages: 6
...Dear Terry Pratchet, First of all, Would you support assisted suicide? That’s true; euthanasia is considered assisted suicide. If the government resolves to legalize it, subsequently it shall be used for people suffering from non-terminal diseases and may possibly even used as a way to end a life due to bullying or depression. People should not cross the line their moral boundries Do you believe humans should be given the right to play god? Countless religious leaders have said time and time again that euthanasia is playing God. The person who takes the poison will go to hell as in religion it is an act of suicide. As the three Holy books say that euthanasia is “forbidden” as it is going against gods will. Many people consider euthanasia to...
Words: 859 - Pages: 4
...articulating the ethical theories, believes on the contrary that in every moment of our existence, every action or deed that we accomplish can be described as moral or non-moral according to the ethical principles underlying our behavior. The very important consequences arising from the two general theoretical horizons concern two different perspectives on “human nature”, or what we call the essence of the human being. Starting from this horizon we will have the consequentialist and deontological dimensions related to euthanasia. The bioethical dimension in which we will discuss the issue of euthanasia involves both dimensions or horizons. The arguments against euthanasia seem to rely rather on the Kantian deontological horizon, while euthanasia pros seem to rely on the consequentialist horizon. This text is intended as an open debate between the two horizons which cannot yet be harmonized. There is at least one class of existential situations in which euthanasia is described as “desirable” in a consequentialist view and there are situations...
Words: 9099 - Pages: 37
...and forces humans to take a stance. Euthanasia is argued to be a simple human right but is it truly, if it means lowering doctors’ status to executioners. “My fear is that [assisted death] will become a constant presence in healthcare settings, a big friendly mutt that lays its head in [the] lap [of the disabled] and wags its lethal invitation whenever we doubt our ability to go on”(Corbet). Therefore, Euthanasia should be eradicated throughout the United States of America, not only because it is immoral and unreasonable, but also, because it is a slippery slope to murder, it volunteers doctors for a role they are...
Words: 458 - Pages: 2
...Being terrified of becoming a financial burden on significant others is one reason why people want their lives to end by euthanasia .Insufficient funding for palliative care is equated to people who reach old-age feeling of frustrated about physical limitations and try to survive on the debilitating state that could be resolve with proper care. In comparison, it cost 35 thousands dollars to treat a long term disease condition and just 35 dollars will be spent for drugs in a euthanasia. Pro-life organisations argues that the demand for euthanasia could be eliminated totally with the chronic disease wellness programs . Huge budget blow-outs in health spending means that health-care institutions will be obliged to make budget...
Words: 263 - Pages: 2
...2 April 2014 Rhetorical Analysis: Euthanasia Particular Analysis There are three key audiences of the text for William F. May's “Rising to the Occasion of Our Death.” The first audience, in this case, would be legislative organizations or lawmakers who have researched and studied similar cases regarding euthanasia. Since May was as an ethics professor at Southern Methodist University, his tone is decidedly intellectual. An uneducated individual would find it more difficult to read his essay; for example, in declarations such as “Advocates of active euthanasia appeal to the principle of patient autonomy,” May's syntax and tone is formal, informative, and utilizes heavy technical jargon (May 662). In other words, it is authoritative, and enables the audience to view him as a credible source due to his syntactical confidence. Other organizations, lobbyists, or lawmakers who are researching evidence on euthanasia would certainly benefit from reading his expert opinion on the matter. Moreover, his desire to develop a “judicious, regulated policy” is a certain acknowledgement that he is attempting to legally call for regulations on euthanasia (May 662). The second audience that May is appealing to are conservative Christians, who are distinctively pro-life. As his article was originally published in well-circulated The Christian Century magazine, addressing this audience exposes members of May's audience who are unfamiliar with euthanasia to its technicalities by debating...
Words: 3937 - Pages: 16
...Euthanasia: Live and Let Die April 11, 2013 Euthanasia: Live and Let Die In 2004, Pope John Paul II said “A man, even if seriously sick or prevented in the exercise of its higher functions, is and will be always a man… he will never become a ‘vegetable’ or an ‘animal’. The intrinsic value and personal dignity of every human being does not change depending on their circumstances” (Pope John Paul II, 2004). Euthanasia or assisted suicide is the deliberate action of ending a life in order to relieve unstoppable suffering. Euthanasia is legal in Albania, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, as well as some US states. In some of these countries, euthanasia is generally executed by a medical professional taking into account his patient’s needs and desires; but sometimes a medical professional can dispense the last medication ending his patient’s life without the patient’s consent. However, euthanasia and assisted suicide is forbidden in the majority of countries and could be penalized by a fourteen years prison sentence. (“Euthanasia and assisted, intro”). Legalizing euthanasia is extremely controversial moral and legal issue throughout the world, but achieving that goal is extremely necessary. Although legalizing euthanasia could cause negative effects for society, the positive side of this controversy indicates that asking for death is important for those patients who have decided that after a certain point, the pain has exceeded the desire of living. On the one hand...
Words: 1548 - Pages: 7
...Article: A critique of “The Language of Euthanasia” This essay is a critique of the article “The Language of Euthanasia” written by Sheila Grant. After careful evaluation of this article, it is impossible to accept Sheila Grant's’ view on Euthanasia as it commits the fallacies of red herring, hasty conclusion and slippery slope making her persuasive view problematic. The fallacy of the red herring is committed when a person making an argument presents an argument (that can be valid or invalid) but does not address the issue or the question directly. In the article, Grant says “What makes this discussion of this subject so difficult is that there is a great public confusion about the terminology”. I feel that the reference and in-depth debate of the many meanings of the word Euthanasia avoids the subject rather than addressing its ethical value. This fallacy is also committed when the author beings discussing the different types...
Words: 697 - Pages: 3
...in the world today is to legalize euthanasia, and already several countries are considering the passing of legal bills to make euthanasia legal. Argument I: Euthanasia in our modern time is seen as a merciful solution, not as a crime, and it is justified by human feelings and understanding. A- Counter Argument: Euthanasia is nothing than an act of suicide, and hence, it is as morally wrong and unacceptable as suicide is. B- Refutation: Suicide and euthanasia are morally different because suicide is the choice of death as one of several options whereas in euthanasia it is the only choice to end permanent and unbearable pain and suffering. Argument II: Euthanasia should be legalized because this is the only way to regulate a concept that is practiced all over the world anyway. A- Counter Argument: Doctors who assist patients to commit euthanasia should be punished as criminals, because according to their oath, they are supposed to elongate the lives of their patients, not to end them. B- Refutation: Doctors who assist euthanasia cannot be treated as criminals if their intentions are to relieve patients of permanent and unbearable suffering. Medical assisted euthanasia is not in violation with the oath that doctors take to relieve their patients of unbearable and permanent pain. Argument III: Euthanasia has deep roots as it has been practiced by human civilizations. A- Counter Argument: Euthanasia was practiced by barbarian and inhuman...
Words: 1641 - Pages: 7
...Legalization of Euthanasia Euthanasia is a topic that has been debated by many over the years. Although Euthanasia is presently illegal in the United States, physician assisted death, or PAD is legal in the states of Washington, Oregon, Vermont and Bernalillo County, New Mexico. To understand Euthanasia, one must understand the way it differs from PAD. The key distinction between the two is that euthanasia requires either a physician or third party to administer the drugs, while in physician assisted death, the drug is administered directly by the individual. The debate over euthanasia dates back to the Greeks and Romans, but it reached the United States in 1870 when Samuel Williams proposed using morphine and anesthetics to intentionally end an individual's life. Debates continued for another 35 years when Ohio attempted to pass a bill which would legalize euthanasia in 1906. While the bill was never passed, it was the first of its kind, and laid the foundation for bills to come (Humphrys). There are many arguments as to why Euthanasia should remain illegal in the United States. Many individuals argue that it fits the definition of murder, and “For present purposes, murder can be defined as the intentional unjustified, unexcused and legally unmitigated killing of another human being. Active euthanasia fits this definition on the basis that it is the, or a cause of, death” (Lanham 2). Although there is some merit to the argument that euthanasia fits the technical definition ...
Words: 3615 - Pages: 15