Premium Essay

Animal Test

In:

Submitted By sharonql
Words 1254
Pages 6
Opinion paper draft
People Should Not Keep Pets More and more people keep pets in recent years. From a broader perspective, people should not keep pets. This paper will clarify four reasons why people should not keep pets. The issue of whether should keep pets has been extensively debated and remains relentless. According to research, there are 29.8 percents of people who keep pets in China, nearly 50 percents of people keep pets in Europe, and almost 60 percents of people keep pets in the United States (Soltanizadeh 83-94). The topic of keeping pets becomes a international topic. With the increase of number of animals kept at home, more and more people stated that people should not keep pets (Soltanizadeh 83-94). In this paper, I will present arguments in support of the topic that people should not keep pets. There are three reasons. Keeping pets not only wastes resources, but also increase the risk of health of the animals and people. And it is a violation of animal rights. My counter argument is people should keep pets because it adds to the quality of life of both the owner and the animal. There are mainly three reasons why people should not keep pets. Firstly, keeping of pets results in a huge drain on resources that could be put to better use. (Rebekah 525-537). For examples, pets are costly to keep in time, money and energy. As well as the cost to owners in food, vet’s bills and the time spent cleaning and exercising. Secondly, keeping pets is a violation of animal rights. Nowadays people lead such busy lives that often fail to look after pets. (Rebekah 525-537)For examples, Dogs without walks and proper training, cats do not get their litter trays changed, and fish tanks go unclean. (Rebekah 525-537) Moreover, as well as the risk to health of the animals, keeping pets can be damaging to human health. Many animals can pass

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Unit Test, Part 2: Animal Farm

...Graded Assignment Unit Test, Part 2: Animal Farm Answer each question, using complete sentences. (10 points) Score 1. In Chapter 1, Old Major says, “Man is the only real enemy we have. Remove Man from the scene, and the root cause of hunger and overwork is abolished for ever.” Is that true? What does the novel reveal about “real enemies”? Answer: No, man is not the only enemy. In this novel pigs were also the enemy. Once man was chased out, the pigs took over and became exactly like the man. Removing man from the scene did not abolish overwork and hunger forever. In fact, animals questioned whether or not they worked more and ate less than before the man were removed. This is due to the fact that when the pigs took over they were as bad if...

Words: 1164 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Intelligence Testing

...Intelligence testing [Name] [Institution] [Date] Intelligence Testing Intelligence test refers to different assessments that are aim at establishing the competence of an individual in a given field of specialization. It is crucial to evaluate one’s expertise in a given field especially when it comes to interviews for filling a vocational opening. Most of the organizations conduct intelligence test administered through aptitude test to the interested candidates (Carter & Russell, 2007). This is meant to evaluate the competence of a candidate against the required skills for filling job openings. According to the intelligent test employed in this interview, the test is relevant to the desired skills under evaluation. Hence, it is an accurate intelligence test of a valid measure. A valid measure of intelligent refers to the most appropriate form of assessment that would effectively establish levels of competence for the desired skills in an individual. The intelligence test employed in this interview targets to establish an individual’s creativity in determining the odd suggestion out a group of related items such animals from conflicting families. It tests one’s ability of thinking and his or her skills in differentiating items based on their relatedness. After undertaking this test, scores of above 15 points out of 20 would reflect a creative person with high levels of intelligence and skills. Less than 10 points out of 20 reveal an individual who is of below average...

Words: 366 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Standardized Testing

...with hundreds of bubbles to fill in and it’s incredibly overwhelming. Not only that, but this is your first time taking the goliath test that could make or break your future, the ACT. This was my first experience taking the ACT, which was required by my high school, and it was a horrific, four hour long test that I was unfamiliar with. Standardized tests, like the ACT, should be highly revised, if not abolished, due to its inefficient measurement of skill, high levels of stress caused to the students, and its unfairness. Although there are many reasons as to why the ACT is not a reliable test, there are some good qualities it has. The main one is its objectivity: “they are given under nearly identical testing conditions, and are graded by a machine” (Bless). This gives the test some credibility, but in reality, the questions are quite unfair because “objectivity” is different for...

Words: 1230 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

English Language

...i Вторая страница обложки ii Cambridge Practice Tests for IELTS 1 Vanessa Jakeman Clare McDowell C AMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS iii PUBLISHED BY THF PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building Trumpington Street Cambridge CB2 1RP United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia © Cambridge University Press 1996 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1996 Third printing 1997 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge ISBN 0 521 49767 1 Self-Study Student`s Book ISBN 0 521 49766 3 Set of 2 cassettes Copyright The law allows a reader to make a single copy of part of a book for purposes of private study. It does not allow the copying of entire books or the making of multiple copies of extracts. Written permission for any such copying must always be obtained from the publisher in advance. iv Contents Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 Practice Test 1 12 Practice Test 2 34 Practice Test 3 54 Practice Test 4 75 General Training Reading and Writing Modules Tapescripts Answer keys 94 107 130 ...

Words: 41994 - Pages: 168

Free Essay

Case Study

...i Вторая страница обложки ii Cambridge Practice Tests for IELTS 1 Vanessa Jakeman Clare McDowell C AMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS iii PUBLISHED BY THF PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building Trumpington Street Cambridge CB2 1RP United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia © Cambridge University Press 1996 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 1996 Third printing 1997 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge ISBN 0 521 49767 1 Self-Study Student`s Book ISBN 0 521 49766 3 Set of 2 cassettes Copyright The law allows a reader to make a single copy of part of a book for purposes of private study. It does not allow the copying of entire books or the making of multiple copies of extracts. Written permission for any such copying must always be obtained from the publisher in advance. iv Contents Acknowledgements iv Introduction 1 Practice Test 1 12 Practice Test 2 34 Practice Test 3 54 Practice Test 4 75 General Training Reading and Writing Modules Tapescripts Answer keys 94 107 130 ...

Words: 41994 - Pages: 168

Premium Essay

Animal Testing Is Bad

...making is harm free to animals. Many tests are far from cruelty free. There are thirteen standardized tests for makeup testing, most of them being on animals (Siegel-Maier). The most common are the Draize and LD50 (Siegel-Maier). If testing on animals is more expensive and less accurate why choose that over other alternatives. Testing makeup on animals is immoral, ineffective, and unnecessary. Testing makeup on animals is immoral, it is cruel. There are many tests for makeup products that are done on innocent animals. The tests are taken on guinea pigs, rabbits, rats, mice, and sometimes hamsters to ensure safety if product is swallowed, inhaled, or has made contact with skin or eyes, etc.. Diarrhea, convulsions, bleeding from mouth, seizures, paralysis, or death may occur in all of these tests (“Cosmetics”).The test used for substances being swallowed is acute oral toxicity. Seven rats are to swallow an amount of substance and determine which amount cause half of them to die, which is a lot like LD50 (“Cosmetics”). The rat's throat is...

Words: 1557 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...“He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” ― Immanuel Kant. Likewise, we can judge the amount of justice animals get in animal testing. While some believe animals should be tested on because it is necessary, most test on animals are not necessary, fail often, and are inhumane. Tests on animals are not necessary and are incorrect. First of all, most experiments are flawed; 87% of animal tests fail, causing animal lives to be sacrificed for nothing, according to procon.org. This means that people are being inconsiderate about wasted animals subjects. In the same fashion, 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials anyways. To add, there are many alternatives to animal testing, and new technology that does not require animal subjects. WIth all these failed tests, animals are dying for...

Words: 519 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Animal Testing Research Paper

...products on animals is the best way, but that is the worst way. Millions of animals die everyday from testing cosmetic products. In fact, testing a single ingredient for deodorant can easily cause the death of 1,400 animals (Manila Times). Scientists need to put an end to animal...

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...Did you know that “the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered pain during [animal tests]” (ProCon). The fact that over 71,370 animals are suffering through tests begs the question as to why we continue if that many animals are being harmed. However, the rise of animal testing in products has brought up a controversial issue since the late nineteenth century when it first became popular. Animal testing is experiments put on animals to help understand the possible outcomes it can put on humans. Today, animals get tested for different products often found in cosmetics, prescriptions, and household cleaning supplies. The cons associated with animal testing today by far outweigh the possible pros that could come from it. Although most people would agree with testing products before humans use them in everyday life,...

Words: 691 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Animal Testing Research Paper

...you ever wondered the benefits of animal tests? Well, there aren’t many. they delay the releases of cures for many diseases, they yield defective results, and they kill/injure 1,000s of humans and animals each year. This is why I argue that they should be banned from the world. I see how an innocent bystander like yourselves would be fooled by the shroud of lies surrounding animal tests and I hope this can make you see the truth. My first reason is that these tests actually delay cures from being released, not hurry them up like they're supposed to. For instance, blood transfusions were delayed a whole 200 years by animal studies! In addition, The polio vaccine was delayed by another 40 years because of … ( big surprise) monkey tests! My last piece of evidence is...

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

...There are various kinds of animal testing, however the most controversial testing that gets the most debate is biomedical research and product testing. In biomedical research "Animals are used to understand basic biology, as “models” for studying human biology and disease, and as test subjects for the development and testing of drugs, vaccines, and other biologicals to improve and advance human health" (Animals in Research Web). Along with that, product testing is the process of using animals in order to "predict toxicity, corrosivity, and other safety variables as well as the effectiveness of new products, traditional testing of chemicals, consumer products, medical devices, and new drugs" (Animals in Research Web). The exercise of animal...

Words: 1744 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

...If you think animal testing is inhumane you’re wrong. There is a large chance that you and millions of other people may not be alive right now without animal testing. Since they have been tested on with medicines, cures, vaccines and billions of other products you use we don’t have to face the brutal consequences. Even though many animals suffer from harmful chemicals and drugs, many “animals themselves benefit from the result of animal testing” (Should Animals Be Used 5). This being said, animal testing is important to conduct because animals are similar for humans, it is highly regulated, and it’s a small price to pay for advancing medical progress. First, animals are appropriate research subjects because they are similar to human beings in many ways. According to the text, “Chimpanzees share 99% of their DNA with humans” (4). This means that the tests we do on animals are extremely accurate. Another example is, “All mammals including humans are descended from common ancestors, and all have the same set of organs (heart, kidney, lungs, etc) that function essentially the same way” (4). This shows that any medication being tested will go through the same organs as us. This...

Words: 613 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

...Animal Testing Is Wrong A high percent of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats, mice, and cold blooded animals, such as reptiles and most fish. The animals used in these experiments are kept in awful conditions just waiting until it’s their turn to be tested on. They are tortured, abused, and more than often killed in the process. Animal testing is wrong, because animals cannot give consent, they have thoughts and emotions, and there are alternative methods. Animals, unlike humans, cannot give consent to be willing participants in experiments. They do not understand what is happening to them, it just happens and there isn’t anything they can do. Nobody, human or...

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Against Animal Testing

...BoWen Zuo Dr. Danielle Bray English 1101 2 March 2015 Pharmaceuticals Should Not Be Tested on Animals Various pharmaceutical companies claim that testing of their products on animals is indispensable because they require a complete living organism in the process of developing pharmaceutical products. Scientific evidences have proven that humans and animals differ with regard to metabolism, physiology, and anatomy (Portaluppi 101). Further evidences point to different reactions to pharmaceuticals and chemicals among animals sourced from different species (van der Worp et al). Consequently, it is impractical to predict the possibility of humans reacting in a similar manner to pharmaceutical products as animals. A study...

Words: 1257 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Why Is Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

...Would you like your body left to Science, while you're still alive and capable of feeling pain? Animals used for testing are taken away from their mothers at a young age to live a life of torture and confinement. Animals used for testing are poisoned, abused, blinded, and killed. Over 100 million animals are killed for research every year. How would you like to be in their situation? Do you think it's worth it to have another shampoo on the market for tons of animals lives? Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. One reason why is because millions of animals are blinded, poisoned and killed for our own products.Another reason why animal testing is cruel and inhumane is that 97,123 animals were in pain every year. The last reason why animal...

Words: 425 - Pages: 2