...Aristotle and Aquinas. Aristotle strongly believed in the world of nature. He thought that there were heavenly bodies that moved eternally in great circles. Furthermore, Aristotle believed that every moving substance changes their position constantly, but in a perfect regular way, without beginning or ending (Melchert, p.176). His theory was that there must be, “something that moves things without being moved”. I interpret that as meaning words can either motivate or degrade a person, effecting their emotions without actually physically moving them. Aristotle thought that God is an eternally, existing human being who lives a life of perfect thought. “Yet he is and must be an actually, existing, individual substance, devoid of matter, and the best in every way”(Melchert, p.177). Moving on, Aquinas understood God differently, and gave five major proofs of God’s existence. The first proof that Aquinas stated was the argument in motion. The way that I think of this is that is it takes something to move something. For example, the force of my hand will pick up a pencil; the pencil needed my hand to pick it up. The second proof that Aquinas mentioned was that in the world of sense there is an order of causes and effects. In other words, something cannot come from nothing. An example would be if something completely popped up out of nowhere, like a meteor randomly appearing in my kitchen. Aquinas believed that God caused their existence. To continue, the third proof that was stated...
Words: 997 - Pages: 4
...Or what are the essences of a person religion? There is no specific answer to any of these questions and therefore one would ask. When people are asked about God existence, from their answers we can classify them in to two groups, the first group would be the believers whom answers will be yes based on the person’s believes. The second group would be the atheist who does not agree on God existence. However, whether a person is a believer or an atheist, there cannot be a significant prove that God exist or not. There two argument to the question of whether God exist or not. The Ontological Argument and the Cosmological Argument. The ontological argument is presented by St Anselm and the Cosmological Argument is presented by Saint Thomas Aquinas. In this essay I am going to explore both argument. The Ontological Argument The first argument I am going to explore is The Ontological Argument explained by St Anselm. In exploring St Anselm argument we can summarize it in the following characteristics. The first characteristic of Anselm ontological argument is that God is a perfect being, and it is imperfection not to exists, hence God does exist. Another characteristic is that God existence is an idea in the mind, which mean that when being exists as an idea in the mind and in reality, and all other things are equal, then there is a greater being that exists only as an idea in the mind for all other things to be compared to, and this...
Words: 1076 - Pages: 5
...Thomas Aquinas and His Use of the Scholastic Method Hayden Robinson World Civilizations The Scholastic Method is a way of proving a theory proposed by another scholar in a series of comparison, argument, and compromise. One well known user of this method was the scholar Thomas Aquinas. In Thomas’ book Summa Theologica, he proves that the existence of God is self-evident using this. Thomas offered The primary question that will be made an example of will be Question 2: The Existence of God. Seeing the Scholastic Method in these three articles will be an easy feat. With reading what he writes about and paying close attention to how he writes it, one can see strong elements of Scholasticism in his method of proving that God exists. Article One states the objections of the existence of knowledge, that God is “known”, as well as the existence of truth. Thomas gives these objections as examples proving that God’s existence is self-evident. He also states possible counter-examples so he may effectively counter the counter-examples with his “I answer that”. This statement of counter-examples show Scholasticism by making an agreement between two sides of the argument. Which is why he uses counter-examples as the “other side” of the argument that God’s existence is self-evident. Another form of the Scholastic Method is other books and or philosophers. Like one quote, Aquinas uses the verse Hebrews 11:1 which says “faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things...
Words: 680 - Pages: 3
...BACKGROUND St. Thomas Aquinas was philosopher and theologian. Hewas born circa 1225 in Roccasecca, Italy. He is the son of Landulph, count of Aquino and his mother, Theodora, countess of Teano. Thomas had eight siblings, and was the youngest child. Though Thomas's family members were descendants of Emperors Frederick I and Henry VI, they were considered to be of lower nobility. Combining the theological principles of faith with the philosophical principles of reason, he ranked among the most influential thinkers of medieval Scholasticism. An authority of the Roman Catholic Church and a prolific writer. In January 1274, St. Thomas Aquinas embarked on a trip to Lyon, France, on foot to serve on the Second Council, but never made it there. Along the way, he fell ill at the Cistercian monastery of Fossanova, Italy. The monks wanted St. Thomas Aquinas to stay at the castle, but, sensing that his death was near, Thomas preferred to remain at the monastery, saying, "If the Lord wishes to take me away, it is better that I be found in a religious house than in the dwelling of a layperson." On his deathbed, St. Thomas Aquinas uttered his last words to the Cistercian monks who had so graciously attended him: "This is my rest forever and ever: Here will I dwell for I have chosen it." (Psalm 131:14) Often called "The Universal Teacher," St. Thomas Aquinas died at the monastery of Fossanova on March 7, 1274. He canonized by Pope John XXII in 1323. Source: http://www.biography.com/people/st-thomas-aquinas-9187231#early-life& ...
Words: 1314 - Pages: 6
...Thomas Aquinas believed in God and wanted to prove God's existence to anyone who would not accept his faith alone. We can prove God's existence in different ways, but we cannot prove it by examining the concept of God. Aquinas proves the existence of God in five ways. In “ Summa Theologiae” written by Thomas Aquinas, in his third article he accepts that something necessarily exists which is god. The third way is found to be the most complex out of the five ways. Aquinas states that everything can fit into a “need-not-exist” category, so if everything belongs or fits into this category then is it true, that at one time nothing did exist? Or on the other hand, would have it been impossible for anything to exist, and even now would nothing exist....
Words: 643 - Pages: 3
...moral philosophy and metaphysical philosophy. Philosophy is a system of principles for guidance. So how do philosophy and the Christian life intersect? One of the ways to understand that is to look at the early church philosophers that have shaped our knowledge and understanding of the scriptures. In the following paragraphs we will examine the philosopher Thomas Aquinas. Thomas had a way of understanding God that you may or may not agree with but hopefully will learn about him in the paragraphs ahead. Thomas Aquinas was an Italian Dominican theologian and philosopher that is believed by many to be one of the most influential thinkers of Scholasticism and is also know as the father of the Thomistic school of theology. Thomas Aquinas was born in the year 1225 in Roccasecca, in the Kingdom of Sicily also know as present day Italy. He combined the theological principles with the principles of reason and he is ranked by many as one of the most influential thinkers of medieval Scholasticism. Thomas was the son Landulf of Aquino and is believed to be born in his father’s castle. At the age of five Thomas began his education at Monte Cassino to train among Benedictine monks. He remained there until he was around the age of 13 when political tempers began to flare and that forced him to move to Naples. It was while he was studying at the Benedictine house in Naples that he was introduced...
Words: 2371 - Pages: 10
...presented the concept of evolution, certain philosophers refute it and claim the idea of creation. Thomas Aquinas is a philosopher who believed in creation of man by a supreme being, God. In his most famous work, Summa Theologica, Aquinas gives five proofs of the existence of God through the five senses. In this novel, Aquinas also declared that God made every human being and every soul individually. He argues that God can bring something nonexistent into existence. Aquinas says that God does not simply change one existing thing into another but creates things into...
Words: 1019 - Pages: 5
...Explain the cosmological argument with particular reference to: The rejection to infinite regress and god as the necessary being (30 Marks) The Cosmological Argument is a posteriori argument put forward by St. Thomas Aquinas. Gottfried Leibnitz also made a similar argument. In the Cosmological Argument, Aquinas said that he believed that all things in the world were caused to exist by something. The universe exists, so there must be something that caused the universe. He believed the first cause to be God. He said that God is the only thing that was not caused by something else. The argument seeks to prove the existence of God from looking at the world we live in and the universe as a whole. The whole theory is based on cause and effect (when one event causes another to happen, the cause is why it happens and the effect is what happens.) Aristotle believed that all movement depends on there being a mover, and there has to be something that originates this. The universe follows this principle so needs a mover – this is the prime mover. The mover caused everything to come into existence, however, needs nothing to cause it and so must be exempt from the laws of nature. Thomas Aquinas created five ways to prove the existence of God, the first proof is based on motion, It can be noted that some things in the universe are in motion and it follows that whatever is in the state of motion must have been placed in motion by another such act, and things achieve their potential through...
Words: 510 - Pages: 3
...intelligent designer would have simply created the laryngeal nerve shorter and ingenuous rather than intricate. In the reading the five ways, St. Thomas Aquinas trusts in an intelligent designer, and throughout his literature and beliefs express the five ways in which an intelligent designer could be proven to exist. On the contrary, in the article “The Ethics of Belief”, William Clifford denotes the discourse of reasoning context. The laryngeal nerve argument is a contemporary controversial disagreement between naturalism and supernaturalism. Aquinas aspects discard the ideas that evolution is the logic outcome of an imperfect design, while Clifford’s writing justifies both arguments. The questionable argument whether the actuality of an intelligent designer is proven to exist or the complexity of the giraffe’s laryngeal nerve is a causation of evolution is called out into doubt. According to David Papineau from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the term naturalism is a method that “rejects supernatural entities, and allow that science is a possible route to important truths about the human spirit.” In other words, naturalism is the only branch that examines all areas of reality. Despite naturalism, trough the writing of “The Five Ways”, St Thomas Aquinas a theology philosopher presents his own five ways to prove the existence of God. Aquinas first way is an argument from motion called “The Argument from Change,” in which in order for something to be in motion, there has...
Words: 1613 - Pages: 7
...St. Thomas Aquinas listed what he saw as five intellectual proofs of the existence of God—proofs that were dependent on reason and observation, not the revealed word of God. 1. Aquinas recognized that for motion to take place, there had to be something that interacts with it to cause it to move. This, in turn must be an infinite being outside of creation and hence is God. 2. Every effect must have a cause, if you eliminate the cause you eliminate the effect. It only posits that a God exists who is the cause of all things and who is the effect of nothing. 3. Aquinas argued that from observation, the things around him had the possibility of being (or existing) or not being. Yet, if that first being exists, he must necessarily not have the possibility of not being. In other words, as non-existence cannot bring about existence, the first being necessarily has to have always existed. And this entity that necessarily exists and cannot not-exist, is God. 4. Note that this is not the suggestion that we get the idea of goodness or hotness from God, but simply that there must always be something that is more good or more hot than that which we are viewing and since there is a gradation, there must always be a top to the gradation that can never be surpassed. Such a top or asymptote, by definition, requires an infinite being, hence it must be God. 5. Fifthly, Aquinas points out that there are entities in creation that have no consciousness at all, yet still act in a regular fashion...
Words: 308 - Pages: 2
...be. Moreover, in order to solve the Problem of Evil, these assumptions have to change in order to accept the necessary solutions to the former problem. Saint Thomas Aquinas, founder of scholasticism and a saint in the christian faith, defines God’s creation of the universe in his five proofs. Born in Italy in 1225, Aquinas acquired a religious education in Naples and followed the Dominican ideology (Chenu). He followed this sect of Christianity after meeting several Dominican monks during his education, and from there forth, he began preaching to the common people. Furthermore, he took a vow of poverty, modesty, and chastity. Also, he would be the founder of the Scholastic movement, which was founded on the basis of using logic and reason to help prove the existence of God and strengthen christianity. During the Scholastic movement, he also created The Five Proofs, which are five statements that used reasoning to prove that God was real. These proofs can be broken down into the; “motion argument, efficient causes argument, gradation of being, design argument, and the argument from possibility and necessity” (Gracyk). Each of these arguments can be summarized as, that, in this world there are several processes or truths that have had to happen, God was the one who made it happen. However, still, one thing Aquinas’ fails to address still is a solution to the Problem of Evil. Furthermore, while his arguments are used as basis for many positions on God’s existence, he still is based...
Words: 1597 - Pages: 7
...in the emergence of countless theories to prove the existence of a Supreme Being. Following the three different arguments, defended and criticized by numerous philosophers, the ontological, cosmological, and teleological argument are indisputable proof of the existence of God. The idea of God has been around for thousands of...
Words: 1527 - Pages: 7
...Andrew Hall Faith and Critical Reasoning 12/10/2013 What is the Eschatological goal of existence? Since the beginning of human existence there has always been some type of battle about faith, belief, and the existence of god. When this class first began I didn’t know what to expect due to my own personal beliefs and spiritual upbringing, but as the course went on I was open to different views and ways to look at what has been taught for years. Even today there is still the constant battle on whom and what is the true belief and god. But one thing is for sure we all strive for a common goal and that is to be in the grace of whatever Deity you believe in when your time on earth is done. The first thing that comes to question is your belief in the existence of God. For many the belief in god is a very challenging issue. There will always be an ongoing controversial discussion whether or not God exist. It is not unusual for people to say that it is impossible to prove the existence of God. This impossibility derives from the idea that if the observable phenomena is absent, therefore, it does not exist. In truth, how can one presume to observe the divine, something that exists in the heavens? Mere observation is clearly not a possibility when dealing with a transcendent being. Evidence in the existence of God is in every cause and effect. We understand that nothing happens in and of itself. Every event originates from a preceding event. Those events, if traced back...
Words: 1516 - Pages: 7
...Nikki Thompson Final Paper The Proof that God Exists The greatest question that man has ever asked is “Why”, as philosophers it is the only question that one asks. Since the birth of man kind, the question has been asked “where do we come from”; and since the birth of man kind the answer was simple, someone put us here, a person of higher being, a person often referred to as God. As a philosopher and thinker one can not simply believe in the existence of God, but ask the question why; why does God exist. There are many philosophers who dare to answer the “Why” including Rene Descartes, Immanuel Kant, and Thomas Aquinas. In answering this question there has developed three main arguments that focus on the proof for the existence of God; the Teleological, Cosmological, and Ontological arguments. The most difficult of the three arguments to understand is the Ontological argument, for it is purely logical proof; it attempts to argue from the idea of God to His necessary existence. Simply put the ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of God by stating God exists because he must. “While from the fact that I cannot conceive God without existence, it follows that existence is inseparable from Him, and hence that He really exists. For it is not within my power to think of God without existence.”(Descartes 135) Simply put, in the entire world there is a greatest, a number one, in every aspect of competition there is someone in which never loses. God must exist because...
Words: 1750 - Pages: 7
...something other than itself for its existence. It explains that everything has a cause, that there must have been a first cause, and that this first cause was itself uncaused. Many philosophers have explored the cosmological argument, including Aquinas, in much depth, through his Five Ways in the Summa Theologica. Thomas Aquinas rejected the ontological argument of Anselm, saying that had it been convincing, the existence of God would be self-evident to everyone. He argued that the fact people deny God’s existence is proof enough that it is not in fact self evident. Aquinas believed from faith that God existed and he believed that the real world contained enough evidence for this; Aquinas wrote the Five Ways in order to prove his beliefs. Each ‘way’ of the Five Ways is an exercise of reason, not of faith; they are the classical exposition of natural theology. The first three of the five ways are based on the cosmological argument. The first way that Aquinas proposed to support the cosmological argument regarded the ‘unmoved mover’; he stated that things are seen to move in the world because they are moved by something else. The existence of motion in the universe requires us to consider where, and how, motion began. Aquinas stated that “motion is nothing else than the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality. But nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of...
Words: 1393 - Pages: 6
