...AHS 301 Systematic Review Group Assignment Total of 405 points From your assigned topic, you will need to develop a clinical/research question that will allow you to conduct and write a (modified) systematic literature review. The clinical/research question must be approved by the instructor by June 17, 2016. The (modified) systematic literature review must include: 1. An introduction/background section – brief description of the background on the topic focusing specifically on the clinical/research question. Be sure to include enough information so that someone who is not familiar with the topic/research question has a firm understanding of the significance. 2. A methods section – description of search strategy (including databases and keywords) used to identify the relevant peer-reviewed primary studies. Be sure to include a full description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria. You need to provide enough information so that the search can be repeated. 3. A results section – description of the articles selected. Use of tables containing relevant information might be appropriate. 4. A discussion section – integrated synthesis of the results found. Be sure to include any limitations and/or strengths that resulted from the analysis of the primary studies. 5. A conclusion section - application of synthesized results to the appropriate patient population. 6. Use of APA 6th edition guidelines for formatting and references. ...
Words: 286 - Pages: 2
...assert that the regulations for the protection of human research subjects do not really apply to the kind of research that they do, believing that the rules were written exclusively for biomedical research. There is a kernel of truth in this because revelations in the early 1970s about egregious medical experiments provided the impetus for developing federal standards for protecting human research subjects. However, a close reading of the regulations will find mention of research methods and topics of inquiry relevant for researchers in the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. Methods include surveys, interviews, focus groups, oral history, participant observation, observations of public behavior, and the analysis of existing data. Topics include research on perception, cognition, motivation, identity, language, communication, cultural beliefs or practices, and social behavior. In addition to explicitly identifying these methods, the regulations include provisions that allow for appropriate review of social science, humanities, and behavioral research. For example, the regulations: * Identify research activities that are low risk, for example, a survey in which no identifiers are collected, and that are thus exempt from the remaining provisions of the regulations, such as the requirement for continuing review. * Identify research activities with no more than minimal risk that can be reviewed by one or more Institutional Review Board (IRB) members, rather...
Words: 2798 - Pages: 12
...consists of modules from two basic tracks, Biomedical (Biomed) and Social-Behavioral-Educational (SBE), and a set of Additional Modules of Interest. Organizations may group these modules to form a basic Biomed or SBE course, or a course that combines the two tracks. The Additional Modules of Interest should be used in any course variation, if relevant. The basic Biomed modules have three corresponding sets of refresher modules and the basic SBE modules have two corresponding sets of refresher modules. These refresher modules are intended to provide learners with a review of what was covered in the basic level modules. It is generally recommended that organizations select refresher module requirements that reflect their selections for the basic course(s). Refresher courses should be taken in a cycle at an interval specified by your organization (for example, Refresher Stage 1: 3 years after completion of basic course; Refresher Stage 2: 6 years after completion of basic course). Three additional standalone courses are available: Institutional/Signatory Official: Human Subject Research, and IRB Chair. The Institutional/Signatory Official: Human Subject Research course provides a general introduction to the roles and responsibilities of the institutional official at an organization holding a Federalwide Assurance (FWA). The IRB Administration course offers members of an Institutional Review Board’s (IRB) administrative office a comprehensive review of the critical areas...
Words: 9766 - Pages: 40
...Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process Content Authors Ada Sue Selwitz, M.A. The University of Kentucky Norma Epley, M.S. East Carolina University Janelle Erickson, MPH Institute for Systems Biology Introduction The purpose of this module is to provide a basic understanding of the human subject protection regulations that govern the participation of human volunteers in research in the United States. Learning Objectives By end of the module you should be able to: Describe the role, authority, and composition of the IRB. List the IRB requirements for conducting research involving human subjects. Describe the types of IRB review. Describe the process of working with the IRB. Identify other regulations and regulatory groups that require compliance based on the type of research being conducted. IRB Role, Authority, and Composition The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects. Regulations require IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects if it is funded or regulated by the federal government. Most research institutions, professional organizations, and scholarly journals apply the same requirements to all human research. Although federal regulations refer to IRBs, an institution may have chosen a different name for this committee. To clarify when IRB review is required, let's define some...
Words: 5985 - Pages: 24
...Tarver ID: 5548861 Log Out Help CITI Program Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative at the University of Miami Search Knowledge Base Search Main Menu My Profiles My CEUs My Reports Support Main Menu › Quiz Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process Quiz Instructions: Please provide an answer for all questions. Each question is one point. Click on the Submit button to register your answers. After submitting your answers, the correct answer to each question and an explanation will be displayed. Navigational links to the next module will be provided. All quiz questions count towards your score. You should answer all questions. Question 1 Multiple Choice/Single Answer - Select only one answer A subject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. How should the investigator proceed, with respect to the IRB, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? Report the adverse drug experience to the IRB only if there are several other occurrences. Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB. Report the adverse drug experience as part of the continuing review report. Do not report the adverse drug experience to the IRB since it is a common adverse experience. Question 2 Multiple...
Words: 492 - Pages: 2
...Quiz Results - Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process You correctly answered 5 of 5 and received 5 of 5 possible points. Scroll down to review the quiz questions and the explanation of the answers. Question 1 Question : A subject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. How should the investigator proceed, with respect to the IRB, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? Your answer : Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB. Correct Answer : Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB. Comment : The most appropriate action for the investigator to take is to report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner using the forms provided by the institution. Points Earned : 1 Question 2 Question : How long is an investigator required to keep consent documents, IRB correspondence, and research records? Your answer : For a minimum of three years after completion of the study Correct Answer : For a minimum of three years after completion of the study Comment : Research investigators are responsible for retaining signed consent documents, IRB correspondence, and research records for at least three years after completion of the research. Since...
Words: 674 - Pages: 3
...Quiz Results - Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process You correctly answered 3 of 5 and received 3 of 5 possible points. Scroll down to review the quiz questions and the explanation of the answers. Question 1 Question : | A subject in a clinical research trial experiences a serious, unanticipated adverse drug experience. How should the investigator proceed, with respect to the IRB, after the discovery of the adverse event occurrence? | Your answer : | Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB. | Correct Answer : | Report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner, in keeping with the IRB's policies and procedures, using the forms or the mechanism provided by the IRB. | Comment : | The most appropriate action for the investigator to take is to report the adverse drug experience in a timely manner using the forms provided by the institution. | Points Earned : | 1 | Question 2 Question : | How long is an investigator required to keep consent documents, IRB correspondence, and research records? | Your answer : | For a minimum of three years after completion of the study | Correct Answer : | For a minimum of three years after completion of the study | Comment : | Research investigators are responsible for retaining signed consent documents, IRB correspondence, and research records for at least three years after...
Words: 277 - Pages: 2
...montana.edu/research/osp/documents/CITICheatSheet.doc o o CITI On-Line Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course. MSU “Research” ...Research Compliance. CITI (RH Column) https://www.citiprogram.org/. [DOC]CITI IRB Mandatory Training “Cheat Sheet” media.news.health.ufl.edu/.../CITI%20IRB%20Training%20Cheat%20Sh... o o CITI IRB Mandatory Training “Cheat Sheet”. Effective January 7th, 2013, IRB-01 required Mandatory Training for researchers. This training has 3 components:. [XLS]Human Subjects Research (HSR) Series - CITI https://www.citiprogram.org/citiDocuments/Forms/Order_Form.xls o o To discuss course recommendations that combine modules from different CITI Programofferings, please contact the CITI Program Help Desk at (305) 243-7970. HSP Training FAQ Answers www.research.uky.edu/ori/human/HSPtrainingFAQanswers.htm o o Jump to CITI User Information - QUESTION, ANSWER. 1. How do I create a CITI user account? CURRENT CITI USERS – Users that have an existing CITI ... [DOC]A FEW ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS YOU MAY ALREADY ... https://science.nichd.nih.gov/.../A%20FEW%20ANSWERS%20TO%20Q... o o Training curricula are specified as Clinical Research, Epidemiological and ... Just-inTime CITI courses may be required by the IRB or PI if an investigator is ... Download Citi Training Quiz Answers PDF - YouTube ▶ 0:16 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zdVau36u8A Jul 28, 2015 - Uploaded by Chung Whipple Download Citi Training Quiz Answers...
Words: 449 - Pages: 2
...Questionnaire Introduction Check Your Knowledge Introduction Agenda – Day One • • • • • • • • Research roles and responsibilities Policies and Procedures overview Institutional Review Board Office (IRB) NUCATS NURAP Conflict of Interest (COI) Export Controls Innovation & New Ventures Office (INVO) Introduction Introduction Research Administration Training The need for research administration training exists because of the large dollar amounts in research funding and the importance of compliance: • NU received $511.7 million in research funding in FY 2011 • NU ranked 25th in NIH research funding to universities in 2010 • Ensuring compliance remains a federal priority Source: Office for Research Annual Report. (2011): Northwestern University Introduction Research Administration Training Research Administration training helps Northwestern: • Decrease compliance risks • Administer grants more consistently & efficiently • Provide support for research administrators, faculty & staff • Meet federal government expectations regarding training and communication Introduction Training Objectives During this seminar we will: • Explain the research administration process • Discuss the roles & responsibilities of research faculty and staff • Describe the roles of the central research offices • Review the regulatory fundamentals that form the foundation of research administration Introduction Questions? Introduction Roles & Responsibilities Lauran...
Words: 5758 - Pages: 24
...Reyes, Scott Maul Location: When: Attendees: Course Objectives: The objective of this course is to provide IRB staff with the necessary tools, information, training, and support needed to prepare for and successfully pass the Certified IRB Professional (CIP) examination. Course Content Week 1 (6/16/08) Lecture Content and Speaker(s) Introduction, Overview, History, Common Terminology (Susan, Gordon, Peter) HHS/OHRP regulations, definitions, guidances (Kristin) FDA regulations & definitions, FDA/HHS similarities & differences, applicability (Kathy & Sandy) Reportables: Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (Darcy) HSPP/IRB Organizational & Administration International Research (Kristin, Sandy) Vulnerable Populations (Frances Richmond) Week 2 (6/23/08) Week 3 (6/30/08) Week 4 (7/7/08) Week 5 (7/14/08) Week 6 (7/21/08) Updated 6/19/08 1 of 2 Week 7 (7/28/08) Revisit FDA & OHRP ICH & GCP (Kathy & Kristin or Sandy) HIPAA, COI, State Law (Marlene) *Pre-post practice test, Q&A, CIP Discussion, Test Strategies (Sandy Jean) Week 8 (8/4/08) Week 9 (8/11/08) *Pre-post practice test (Sandy) TBD Notes: We want to have people teach their expertise and don’t want to overburden anyone. The OPRS office will confirm attendance, handle logistics, etc… Course materials will be provided by OPRS: IRB Management and Function (Bankert & Amdur), Protecting Study Volunteers in...
Words: 15427 - Pages: 62
...------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Bottom of Form Text size: A A * Theodore Lange ID: 1113086 * Log Out * Help CITI Program Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative at the University of Miami ------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Bottom of Form * Main Menu * My Profiles * My CEUs * My Reports * Support * Main Menu › VA Human Subjects Protection › Informed Consent Informed Consent Content Author * Diane Paul, M.S., RN National Comprehensive Cancer Network Introduction It is important to understand that informed consent is a process that begins with the recruitment and screening of a subject and the signing of the consent document, continues throughout the subject's involvement in the research, and continues beyond study termination. It includes: * Recruitment efforts encompassing the means of first creating awareness or contact and spanning everything from medical record review to advertisements and other recruitment materials. * Providing specific information and answering questions about the study to subjects in a way that is understandable to them while giving subjects adequate time to consider participation. * Obtaining the voluntary agreement of subjects to take part in the study. While the subject may agree to participate in the study, subjects may withdraw at any time. Part of the ongoing nature of the consent process is verifying the...
Words: 3525 - Pages: 15
...Internal Review Board For The Protection Of Human Subjects In Research North Carolina Central University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH Request for Review of Research Involving Human Subjects COVER SHEET | | (For Staff Use Only) | | |1. School/Department/Unit:NCCU/Psychology |REQUEST #____________ |Today's Date February 3, 2005 | 2. Name of Principal Investigator (PI) ______________________________________________ Name of Faculty Advisor (FA), if PI is a student__Dr. Les Brinson _________________________________ Telephone Number (PI): 919*530*4526_ Mailing Address (PI): PO Box 19408 Durham, NC 27707 Telephone Number (FA):919*530*5166 Mailing Address(FA): Taylor Ed. Rm 217A Durham, NC 27707 3. PROJECT TITLE: ____________Organizational Communication and Its Relationship With Job Performance and Job Satisfaction _________ 4. PROJECT TYPE: __N__ (Select one: N = New; AR = Annual Renewal; PC = Protocol Change) This is a : _SP__ (Select one: SP = SPECIFIC PROJECT or GP = GRANT PROJECT PROPOSAL) If Grant Project Proposal, list agency and address to which project is being submitted: __________________________________________________________________________________________ ...
Words: 3623 - Pages: 15
... The year 1932 was when the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) started its Tuskegee Syphilis Study (Biber 83). This study involved the inspection of untreated latent syphilis cases in human subjects and tried to find out the natural course of the disease. The sample for this study consisted of three hundred and ninety nine black males from Tuskegee, Alabama with late-stage syphilis and two hundred and one non-infected males. Along the years research has been undertaken without the consent of the subjects. The Weber State University website indicates their involvement in the formulation of research guidelines under the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Under the Public Health Service Act there is a regulation to protect human subjects of research and implement a guidance instruction on ethical issues. Three basic principles of ethics were formulated to protect human subjects in biomedical and behavioral research. One of the principle advocates for respect for persons which involves recognition of personal dignity. The second principle aims at ensuring that subjects are protected and given maximum benefits while reducing harm. The third principle calls for justice in the distribution of benefits. The men who were involved in the Tuskegee study were not treated against syphilis. Even with the availability of antibiotics in the 1940’s the subjects were not administered with the drug which put their lives to great risk (Biber 83). Forty years later the study...
Words: 931 - Pages: 4
...available to decide if the patient should participate in a clinical trial that offers a treatment may increase the of survival more than the current standard of treatment. We must than think of the patient’s best interest at this point. History of Informed Consent Following World War II, the Nazis who performed medical experiments on prisoners of war without obtaining their consent were convicted of murder, but not for their actions of conducting unethical research. Their actions helped bring to life the Nuremberg Code of 1948; the first legal document to enforce the idea that subjects’ participation in clinical research must be voluntary. Many of the elements that help make up the Nuremberg Code are included in the code of federal regulations (CFR) parts 50 and 312 and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 good clinical practice guidelines2. Some key guidelines included are 1) Subjects should be of sound mind and able to understand the procedures and risks of a study and make a decision to participate...
Words: 2056 - Pages: 9
...available to decide if the patient should participate in a clinical trial that offers a treatment may increase the of survival more than the current standard of treatment. We must than think of the patient’s best interest at this point. History of Informed Consent Following World War II, the Nazis who performed medical experiments on prisoners of war without obtaining their consent were convicted of murder, but not for their actions of conducting unethical research. Their actions helped bring to life the Nuremberg Code of 1948; the first legal document to enforce the idea that subjects’ participation in clinical research must be voluntary. Many of the elements that help make up the Nuremberg Code are included in the code of federal regulations (CFR) parts 50 and 312 and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 good clinical practice guidelines2. Some key guidelines included are 1) Subjects should be of sound mind and able to understand the procedures and risks of a study and make a decision to participate...
Words: 2076 - Pages: 9