...counter argument throughout this paper purpose directs focus amongst arguments’ opposing flawed general hasting reasoning toward slippery slopes the human kind sees logical presenting why homosexuals should not be able to marry. II. The political fight for homosexual marriage is important not in the reasoning surrounding the topic that homosexuals should be able to marry. A. Marriage wrap around the meaning of love. B. The topic children affected by homosexual parenting disputes raise issues. C. Homosexual civil rights is not being seen the same as heterosexuals. III. The author’s core elements in counter argument are deep-rooted opinions A. Marriage is love, B. Religion C. Effects raising children D. Homosexuals’ rights. IV. Civil rights applies different meaning defining marriage verses union A. Civil rights based on evidence. V. Author Conclusion Understanding Homosexual Issues Reasoning. A. Love, Honor, and Commitment develops a foundation providing reasoning for marital status. Even though as Author, I can understand the views opposing homosexuals’ marriage. As essayist of this paper, I do find further discussed opposing arguments weak for reasoning in determining homosexual not being able to marry. At the same time, understanding homosexual love for another is no different when passion inters either type of relationships. The cause of this paper is to understand the reasoning behind homosexuals emphasizing civil right issues...
Words: 3517 - Pages: 15
...If a survey on homosexual rights in comparison to heterosexual rights is conducted right now, it would probably deduce results showing every other person harping on the importance and necessity of equal rights for both. People would not give it a second thought talking about education, medical, housing or employment rights. They would stress on the fact that homosexuals must also get equal protection of the law and government benefits as compared to heterosexuals. Everything asked will have a favorable response till you reach the point where you talk about gay marriages. That is the instance where they stop to think, where they have opinions, where equality dies and rights is just another term. This gives rise to the question of why do people who passionately support gay rights take a u-turn, and oppose gay marriages with the same passion. The purpose of this essay is to understand why same sex marriages are opposed and to debate whether marriage between homosexuals should be legalized. Before going any further, it is important to define gay marriage. In simple words, gay marriage is between two people of the same sex. It has been given legal status in different parts of the world such as Denmark, Spain, Canada, Norway, Sweden and South Africa. However, one of the greatest advocates of human rights, the United States of America at large does not accept same sex marriage legally. A few states such as New Hampshire, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts...
Words: 1795 - Pages: 8
...Homosexuals should be allowed to marry because the disallowance of it violates their constitutional rights. Marriage is an institution long recognized by our government under the right to pursue happiness, and denying that right to any couple, regardless of gender, is unconstitutional. This argument, though, is not disputed. In fact, none of the arguments raised in opposition to the allowance of homosexual marriages takes into account the constitutional rights afforded to all humans. The arguments are only in relation to the possible repercussions (real or imagined) of granting these rights. Our nation was built and has always been based on the fundamental principles of freedom expressed in the Declaration of Independence and through our Constitution. The opponents of homosexual marriage need to remember what freedom means to America, and understand the significance of setting a precedent that denies that freedom. The Supreme Court has long recognized that the institution of marriage is one of the rights guaranteed to all Americans by our Constitution. Banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. Marriage is a basic human right and should not be denied to any individual. At various times in U.S. history, other minorities have been prevented from marrying: African-Americans, for example. Interracial marriage was also legally prohibited in various states, until the Supreme Court ruled such bans unconstitutional in 1967 ("Should Gay" 31). At this time, however, marriage is only...
Words: 1261 - Pages: 6
...benefits, joint parenting and adoption, and estate planning to name a few. Also signifies a couple’s commitment to one another. The right to marriage should be available to all United States citizens. Regardless of sexual orientation. Gays and lesbians (homosexuals) should be able to marry and have the same rights and privileges as heterosexuals. Same-sex marriage is the union of two people of the same gender. Same-sex marriage is a constitutional and human right. In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled marriage as “A fundamental importance to all individuals and the most important relation of life.” The federal government goes by the constitution. The constitution doses not discuss or deal with same-sex marriage directly. Therefore, the federal government doses not recognize same-sex marriage. Same-sex couples are hoping to get federal and state benefits alongside heterosexual couples. The ones against same-sex marriage believe the gays and lesbians (homosexuals) have done something wrong and should be denied the rights and privileges that come with marriage. They think the idea of legalizing same-sex marriage would put the whole idea of marriage a risk of being redefined entirely. While, individuals for same-sex marriage believe that they have done nothing wrong and should have access to the rights and privileges that go alongside marriage. Nineteen states recognize civil unions and domestic partnerships of same-sex marriage process. The fight for same-sex marriage has...
Words: 486 - Pages: 2
...it was something that was rushed into for the wrong reasons, or maybe it just didn't work out. Marriage can make people grimace or run away scared. Still for some, it is a dream that cannot be realized. Not because they haven't found "the one" yet, as many of the people I speak of have been with their partners for years. It is because the law will not allow them to marry given that they have chosen partners of the same sex. America prides itself on civil rights and equality, however we fall short where gay marriage is concerned. Homosexuals should be allowed marry and enjoy all of the rights and privileges that come along with being a legal union. Most Americans like to consider themselves open minded and non-prejudice people. If you asked them if gays deserved equal rights concerning holding jobs or buying property, a large number of them would agree. However, when the issue of gay marriage comes up, suddenly the rules of equality change. As the topic becomes more prevalent in society, it seems there are more and more arguments against it. CNN reports that nineteen states not only won’t recognize gay marriages, but have amended their constitutions to outlaw them. Why is such prejudice this being allowed? A strong belief of many people is that marriage is for procreation and that children should not be raised by same sex parents. This claim is completely unfounded. Perhaps many years ago, marriage was strictly for procreation. However, these were often hard, loveless marriages...
Words: 1172 - Pages: 5
...Human Sexuality Today, same-sex marriage and civil unions are a hot topic. In the case of the Rhode Island civil unions legislation sponsored by State Representative Nancy Hetherington, the bill would grant same-sex couples the right to legal recognition of their commitment to each other. Along with the recognition, there would also be many of the same rights as traditional marriage. The Principle of Justice says that goodness and badness should be distributed equally. Therefore by allowing same-sex couples to legalize their relationship through a civil union, and offering the same rights heterosexual couples receive then all couples are being treated fairly. The Principle of Individual Freedom is about equality and that all people are equal in moral matters and that they must have the freedom to decide their own morality using the first four as a guide. The Principle of Individual Freedom would say that if two individuals choose to be in a committed same-sex relationship, then they should at least be allowed the right to have a civil union. The rule utilitarian would look at the consequences of civil unions and decide whether the consequences will bring about the greatest good for all concerned (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2009). Marriage is an institution that is both civil and religious. The government gave religious institutions the right to perform the marriage, but the marriage license is still a civil document. If you take religion out of the moral debate, and just view...
Words: 638 - Pages: 3
...the use of coaling and a Naval station. Since 2002, the naval base has operated a detention camp for alleged enemy combatants captured in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other places. Legal issues surrounding the imprisonment without due process is an argument that has continued since the opening of this facility. This essay will argue why the rights afforded by the Constitution should be afforded to detainees at GITMO in terms of habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is a demand by a court to a jailer to produce the prisoner and announce the charges(Levin-Waldman, 2012). Derived from English common law, habeas corpus first appeared in the Magna Carta of 1215 and is the oldest human right in the history of English-speaking civilization. The doctrine of habeas corpus stems from the requirement that a government must either charge a person or let him go free. The Bush administration’s decision to incarcerate enemy combatants at GITMO without habeas corpus has tested the scope and commitment of this constitutional right(Schultz, 2011). This right is clearly stated in Article 1, Section 9 of the constitution that habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. The Bush administration’s argument for denying habeas corpus stems from the Supreme Court’s ruling of the 1950 case of Johnson vs Eisentrager in which Eisentrager and 20 German war criminals were denied the writ of...
Words: 1441 - Pages: 6
...1960s were all about changing the way America viewed sacred things like civil rights, war, and various other objects the counterculture was rallying for. Before this life-changing decade these things were near irrelevant, they were normal and not expected to change. However, during the 1960s these arguments were unavoidable and it was traditional people, typically the elders or parents of the generation, vs the new agers, young adults of the generation. The issues debated in the 60s stirred great conflict between the “religious” elders and the “secular” youths, by facing tradition against charisma, which brought together each of the groups since they needed to rely on each other to develop their argument. The elderly people in the 60s who were not for desegregation, anti-war, nor the new counterculture were categorized as “normative Americans who continued to believe in God, hard work, American exceptionalism,… and “traditional gender roles” (Snyder). This categorization defines them as the “religious” portion of this argument since they identified with believing in God. They were a hard group to get to budge on what they believed since for years prior to the 60s they ignored the efforts made by the younger generations to change the world. The elderly being set in their ways adheres to Smith’s argument that “A little more than half of emerging adults remain quite stable in their levels of religious commitment”(Smith,282)....
Words: 844 - Pages: 4
...the same way. Homosexual marriage is one of the most constitutional issues facing America today. It is an issue that most directly challenges our commitment to genuine legal equality. Although people disagree about the specifics, there is a broad agreement within the American legal and academic communities that all persons shall have the same legal rights regardless of their race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, or religion. But, when the subject turns to gays and lesbians, many people grow more confused and hesitant (Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution, pg. 3). Gay and lesbian couples have been challenging their exclusion from marriage laws since 1971. However, it is only since the early 1990s that gay marriage has emerged as an issue of national political interest. In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court launched an important and ongoing international debate when it ruled that it was impermissible gender discrimination under the state constitution to deny three lesbian and gay couples the right to obtain a marriage license. This decision stated that the state of Hawaii could only deny the marriage licenses if it could indicate a compelling reason to do so. In 1996, a Hawaiian circuit court found that the state has failed to justify its denial with a compelling reason and so the couples must be allowed to marry under civil law. The court recognized that “Gay and lesbian parents and same sex couples can be as fit and loving parents as...
Words: 1685 - Pages: 7
... Legal procedures known as civil commitment can be determined or assessed by the sole opinion of a psychologist or expert. The law implemented serves as the people’s obligation to protect...
Words: 1310 - Pages: 6
...evidential tolerated in parts of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt as shown in artifacts found. The Western world was known for being very accepting of same-sex relationships and unions, which is revealed in Greek paintings. People who are against gay marriage primarily focus on the moral aspect of gay marriage. Supporters of gay marriage think about same-sex couples and the positive effects it can have on them and our society. Gay marriage should be legalized in all states because it is their civil right, it increases family value which leads to an increasing rate in adoption, and same sex marriages stimulate the economy through financial increase. People who are non-supporters of gay marriage believe it goes against the moral and definition of marriage. In Market Watch magazine (2008), many people believe that gay marriages destroy the value of family and tradition. Furthermore, same sex marriage completely goes against major religions such as Catholicism and Islam. However, people do not realize that civil and religious marriages are distinct and separated. Joe Solmoneses, the president of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, states that marriage is not only an important religious meaning but it is also a legal contract. This may be true but there are many couples who do not need religious leaders to signify their marriages. The distinction of religious and law were separated. Aside from the moral aspect of marriage, the definition of marriage is also argumentative. Marriage is...
Words: 1232 - Pages: 5
...Gladwell observes that social media based activism is not as creditable or reliable as it used to be during the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s. throughout the essay he compares the sit-in of four college boys from Greensboro, North Carolina to the modern activist done through Twitter and Facebook. In Gladwell’s view, “Where activists were once defined by their cause, they are now defined by their tools.” (404). In other words, Gladwell believes activists are associated more with their social media platforms than their causes. He refutes the idea of social media based activism because there is no centralized authority, weak-ties among the activists, and little to no discipline or strategy. Unlike Twitter and Facebook activism, traditional...
Words: 497 - Pages: 2
...The Civil War in Guatemala that ran throughout the Cold War Era had very devastating effects on the country and its citizens. With military conflict’s continuously being the case in the nation, and counter insurgencies to attempt to overthrow the government, nobody seemed safe in Guatemala. It was obvious that this conflict needed to end, and eventually, the United States backed coup and the Guatemalan government came to an agreement known as the Guatemalan Peace Accords. Although these accords attempted to bring peace to the nation, problems ensued as agreements were not fully met, and fighting continued through the Seven year negotiations. The reasons for these peace negotiations were obvious; to conclude the civil war and create a better...
Words: 301 - Pages: 2
...world. In this argumentative essay, the topic is explored by three of its main arguments. The first exploration of this topic will involve the ability of same-sex couples to parent as effectively as their heterosexual counterparts. Next, the legal issues surrounding same-sex marriage are explored. Lastly, the religious arguments are evaluated. Both sides of the argument for and against same-sex marriage are discussed while the reader is given a respect for the position of supporting marriage equality. Same-Sex Marriage Traditionally, marriage has been defined as both a religious and civil institution that has been afforded to one man and one woman in the promise of love. Modern, more liberal ideologies have challenged this view. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) people have been at the forefront of championing the cause for the right to expand the definition of marriage to allow everyone to enjoy the same rights and privileges, without discrimination, as their heterosexual counterparts. Amongst the privileges that they seek are to love, honor and cherish their spouses in equal recognition to their heterosexual counterparts. This paper argues that LGBT people should be allowed to marry because homosexual couples are citizens with fundamental rights, moral standing, and parental abilities equal to their heterosexual counterparts. Families and Parenting The first argument concerning same-sex marriage involves the definition of a functional and nurturing...
Words: 1825 - Pages: 8
...Mental health reform has been constantly changing to best fit the patient as well as society. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, involuntary civil commitment laws were in place in most states in the United States to provide care for mentally ill individuals that needed it, but could not realize their need for it (La Fond, 1994). During the 1950’s and 1960’s; however, there was fight against involuntary commitment (La Fond, 1994). The most prominent argument was centered on hospitalized patients’ ability to function outside in the social world, as most people thought “confinement in institutions created a dependency on their structured environment, diminishing patients’ ability to function in the outside world” (La Fond,...
Words: 857 - Pages: 4
