...Introductory paragraph The major differences between the New England, Middle, and Southern colonies were climate, geography, economy, resources, and culture.I believe that the climate, resources affect the culture, so it makes this three colony regions so different.To begin with, New England, an example place is, is Massachusetts.exception for in Rhode Island, a lot of Puritans from the UK come to America for their religion.Then the middle colony regions.Most of the people are English, Swedes, Dutch, Germans, Scots-Irish, and French, because is closer to Europe.Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware were in the middle colony regions.And last the southern colony regions, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia,...
Words: 438 - Pages: 2
...The Southern colonies had its first permanent settlement in the year of 1607 when immigrants settled in present day North Carolina(Virginia.) (Brinkley)In 1619 Virginia became known for the first colony to have an elected legislature, known as the House of Burgess. Most of the people that lived in these colonies where Anglicans and those who weren’t had to leave. (Brinkley) The colonies that made up the southern included; Maryland, Virginia, Georgia and the Carolinas (later split into North & South in 1729.) The southern colonies where founded by the British in 16th and 17th centuries. (U.S.History.org, The Southern Colonies) The weather was humid and warm with hot summers, and long growing seasons. (Brinkley) It was also often rainy and cold. These southern colonies turned to cash crops (indigo dye, rice, Tabaco) with Tabaco becoming the most important. (U.S.History.org, The Southern Colonies) Slaves and servants were very much important to the southern colonies, as that’s who most crops where done by. Settlers traveled from England in order to seek economic prosperity that England lacked. (Staff)...
Words: 1016 - Pages: 5
...ocean blues and discovered a new world. It was later named the Americas where Spain and England fought over to gain power. In the 1600s, colonies were being set up by England to fulfill mercantilism, the belief that a nation can become rich and powerful by either getting gold and silver or selling more goods than it buys. English immigrants came to the Americas for many different reasons. Their common belief was hope in the new world to have a better life. The north and south colonies were settled largely by English origin settlers where two distinct societies developed. The English settlements had varied reasons for coming to the Americas which led to the different developments in their societies such...
Words: 642 - Pages: 3
...Justin Baker R. Brogan US History 1865 Midterm Essay #1: Question #1: Northern, Middle, and Southern Colonies Compare and Contrast America has always been a land of diversity but also a land of unity. This statement also applied to the first English settlements that were established here in North America. In the beginning years of America, the colonies could be divided into three regional areas: New England colonies, middle colonies and the southern colonies. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island comprised the northern colonies; New York, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania made up the middle colonies; and Virginia, Maryland, Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia composed the southern colonies. These three colonial areas had both similarities and differences that will be analyzed in respects to their economic base, political structures, and attitudes toward slavery established in these three regional areas throughout this essay. Although many different types of Europeans founded the colonies throughout the eastern seaboard they were some similarities as to how they were established and how they made their economic bases. Throughout the Norton text I’ve noticed that all of the colonies were established through some sort of business enterprise, whether it was through the Massachusetts Bay Company, or the Virginia Company, or even a lone entrepreneur, looking to make a fortune for them. These businesses were all expected to turn a profit, some of them...
Words: 1093 - Pages: 5
...The Southern Colonies made up of Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. The first permanent settlement in North America was Jamestown, Virginia Southern Colonies in North America were established by England (later Great Britain), during the 17th and 18th centuries and consisted of the Province of Maryland, the Colony of Virginia, the Province of North Carolina, the Province of South Carolina, and the Province of Georgia. The English started the Southern Colonies. The Southern Colonies included Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. Jamestown, Virginia was the first successful Southern Colony in America. The surrounding area was full of disease-carrying mosquitoes and the people who came...
Words: 981 - Pages: 4
...America, the colonies could be divided into three regional areas: New England colonies, middle colonies and the southern colonies. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island comprised the northern colonies; New York, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania made up the middle colonies; and Virginia, Maryland, Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia composed the southern colonies. These three colonial areas had both similarities and differences that will be analyzed in respects to their economic base, political structures, and attitudes toward slavery established in these three regional areas throughout this essay. Although many different types of Europeans founded the colonies throughout the eastern seaboard they were some similarities as to how they were established and how they made their economic bases. Throughout the Norton text I’ve noticed that all of the colonies were established through some sort of business enterprise, whether it was through the Massachusetts Bay Company, or the Virginia Company, or even a lone entrepreneur, looking to make a fortune for them. These businesses were all expected to turn a profit, some of them did and some of them didn’t. However all of the hard work that was done and all of the profit made usually went back to owners of these companies like the Massachusetts Bay Company and the Virginia Company or the profits went to the King of England or to the individual entrepreneur. Another benefactor in having the colonies established...
Words: 1076 - Pages: 5
...Africans were the backbone of manual labor. Although slavery was used throughout all the colonies, there were indeed notable differences between the way slavery worked in each region of the colonies. The amount of slaves in each colony, the labors they did, and the disciplinary systems were seemingly different between the New England, Middle, and Southern colonies. If you were to look at the number of how many slaves were owned in each of the colonies you would see the huge differences in percentages of slaves in each colony. According to the first U.S. census in 1790 the population of the New England colonies was around 827,222 with 3,763 being African slaves so .45% of the population were slaves. In the Middle colonies...
Words: 660 - Pages: 3
...The Societal Differences Between the Chesapeake and New England Colonies After the voyages of Columbus in 1492, the western world began to establish colonies in North and South America primarily for economic, political, and religious gain. This transitioned to three major powers dominating North America, the Spanish, the French, and the English. This threshold on power was solidified by the English after the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588. Due the English’s new found power and confidence, many more English colonies started to develop such as the New England and Chesapeake colonies. The two regional colonies, were vastly different economically, socially, and politically even though they had the same county of origin. Their sharp contrasts...
Words: 1386 - Pages: 6
...Chesapeake and New England Colonies: A Comparison Beginning in the 1600s, England colonized the newly discovered Americas. numerous groups came settled in two regions, the Chesapeake and New England. From the beginning, both had very separate motivation and unique identities. These motivations affected the colonies in every way, including economically, socially, and politically. The Chesapeake and New England attracted different types of settlers and, by 1700, the populations differed enormously. Clearly the Chesapeake and the New England regions did differ in numerous ways. These differences included population, religion, and economy. But also the differences were on a wide-scale range involving almost every aspect of the society, they all sprouted from one initial difference between the two: the very reason the colonists came. Life in colonial America was difficult for all, but more so for some than others. While some colonists struggled to scrape by, some managed to live well and be happy. It is very apparent that health, family, and growth helped New England to be more prosperous and a more enjoyable place to live than in its southern neighbor, Chesapeake Bay. History has proven that these factors have a major effect on the quality of life for people, and this instance is no exception. New England New England was north of the Chesapeake, and included Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Haven. In Puritan New England, a patriarchal...
Words: 2131 - Pages: 9
...geography greatly influenced the economic development and overall success of the colonies that began to form. The Atlantic Ocean connected the colonial world to the old world, which helped colonists obtain goods like tea, steel, and manufactured products. When England creates its first permanent colonies in North America, an essential difference arose between the southern colonies, whose economy was dedicated to production of staple crops, and the more diverse economies of the northern colonies. Throughout the 1600s and 1700s, the New England colonies and the southern colonies in America were significantly impacted by their environment and surrounding natural resources, which is a primary factor of growth for lifestyle and production. The England colonies up in the north had a colder climate than the other two regions of America and greatly benefited because the weather prevented the spread of life threatening diseases. This climate had some drawbacks however. A negative aspect was that there were many harsh winters, which was horrible to early settlements and killed a lot of people. This cold climate also didn’t allow many cash crops to be grown. Many Puritans lived in Plymouth in 1620. They wanted religious freedom from England, did not tolerate other religions, and went to set up their first settlement. Their first years were terrible with lots of starvation and diseases killed many people. The infant colony grew slowly and soon produced corn and fur from nearby trade. The natural...
Words: 658 - Pages: 3
...In 1607 the King of England granted and approved a charter to explore and colonize Jamestown in Virginia. The charter was shown to him by the Virginia Company of London. After a couple months of sea travel, Jamestown was colonized and they began to flourish. The colony began to flourish due to encouragement of a stricter social structure; and also, the creation of a political balance was created though the making of The House of Burgesses in 1619. The southern colonies were lucky enough to be settled on very fertile land. Having fertile land encouraged both subsistence and commercial farming which was a big part of the everyday life style. Commercial farming, which was what encouraged slavery, was mainly for the richer families who had more power. Subsistence farming was mainly for the poorer families in the community. A huge social aspect that was apart of the southern colonies that participated in commercial farming was slavery because it did help create the idea of “the more land you owned the more power you had.” The colonies flourished due to slaves being able to do the work for the colonists without cost. Therefore, farming helped socially build the colony where people were forced to work together creating strict social structure....
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
...Period 4 Jamestown and Plymouth: Differences After the 1400’s two men by the names of John Smith, leader of the Jamestown settlement, and William Bradford, the Governor of the Plymouth, decided to cross the Atlantic Ocean in a ship in search of the "New World.” The Puritans and Jamestown settlers left England in search of a new way of life. While the individuals in both settlements were English, they were different in many important ways. They both had different climate conditions, religious preferences, and had different relationships with the Indians. To fully appreciate our Pilgrim heritage, it is important to understand the differences between Plymouth and Jamestown. One important point that suggests the differences between Jamestown and Plymouth would be the climate. In the introduction to the Byrd journal account, the reader learns that “The Southern climate was kinder” (52).Jamestown was located around a swampy area along the James River where there was a warmer climate and the soil was fertile; however, Plymouth Colony was founded off the Massachusetts coast, with a cold climate and rocky soil. According to the article, “The Southern Planters” the Southerners had a softer and warmer weather, the land was enormously fertile; however, the Northern climate was harsh” (52). Springs and summers were brief and winters were long and colder in the North. As stated in “The Southern Planters”, the land in New England was hard; it's outcroppings and bedrock broke plows and ...
Words: 689 - Pages: 3
...British colonies in the Chesapeake region and New England both had conflicts with the Native Americans due to cultural misunderstanding and the desire for land. The colonists brutally slaughtered the Indians because they control the land that the English colonists wanted for plantations and other resources. In the Chesapeake region, clashes occurred between the Virginia settlers and Powhatan tribe and resulted in the first and second Anglo-Powhatan wars. The colonists exterminated the Indians and burned their villages, banishing the Powhatan tribe from the Chesapeake Bay region to inferior lands. Similarity, in New England, the Pequot War and King Philip's war was fought between the Puritans and the Pequot tribe to resist English settlement on Indian land. In the Mystics Massacre during the Pequot War, the English set an Indian village on fire and shot the escaping survivors; a total of three hundred women and...
Words: 498 - Pages: 2
...The Iroquois Confederacy was formed by the Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca, Mohawk, and Cayuga tribes between 1570-1600. According to Iroquois legends, Hiawatha, the Mohawk chief, along with Deganawida, a Huron, convinced the chiefs of other tribes to make peace. The only way to keep peace between the different nations was to make them become one nation and give them similar goals. Those goals included improving trade relations, capturing land, become more resilient to invasions from other nations and tribes, and share their agricultural advances with each other. As far as being successful at achieving those goals, they were able to achieve them all. For example, they improved their trade relations when they became heavily involved with trade...
Words: 1233 - Pages: 5
...Venture back to the 1700’s, in modern day territories that spanned from Massachusetts, all the way to Maryland, and you will find the early settlers from England that heavily occupied these areas. What is interesting, however, is that these settlers- voyagers from the same land- evolved into two completely different societies. Everything from religion, social class, and political philosophies were different- all possibly rooted in their allegiance to the Crown back home. To the North, or New England Colonies, the settlers occupied Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth, Rhode Island, New Haven, and Connecticut. And to the South, or Chesapeake Region, the settlers occupied Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey. Now, let’s get into the nitty-gritty; the “how and why” these two regions were so different. First thing is first. Chesapeake settlers had a majority allegiance to England’s values. These people, by and large, represented the English establishment back home. So, what does this mean? Well, that...
Words: 891 - Pages: 4
