...The Basic Elements of a Crime Kaplan University The Basic Elements of a Crime Citizens and residents of the United States must follow the laws put into place by our justice system. If citizens do not uphold the law the United States’ criminal justice system will intervene to punish individual/s for the wrongful offenses that were intentionally performed. In this paper I will give a brief overview of criminal law, the distinction between mens rea and actus reus, the concurrence of mens rea and actus reus finishing with “The Simmons Criminal Matter” case file. Criminal Law Criminal law consists of prosecution by the federal or state government, through a prosecutor initiating a suit, upon an individual or individuals for a wrongful offense that was deemed as a crime and was intentionally performed. The individual or individuals charged with the commission of a crime may be incarcerated, fined or both. “A crime is a social wrong or social evil punishable under the law also known as a criminal statute.” (Hames and Ekern, 2010) Most crimes in the United States are established by local, state and federal governments. Crimes include common law, felonies which are more serious offenses and misdemeanors the less serious offenses. No offense can me deemed as a crime if it has not been previously established as such either by statute set in place by the government or common law. All statues defining criminal intent can be broken down into three basic elements: mens rea also known...
Words: 1015 - Pages: 5
...Kevin May Criminal Law Exam part B 08/17/2014 kevinmay1911@gmail.com In criminal law, there are two types of crimes, misdemeanors and felonies. However, within those two groups, there are several varieties of crimes such as crimes against people and crimes against property. Within the several variety of crimes, there are legal defenses to go with them. Criminal law is a simple concept, however, it has multiple complex elements that go with every concept. In this paper, I will be discussing the different aspects of the law covered in our criminal law course, and how it all comes together to impact the individuals and organizations (e.g. businesses and institutions) in society. In order for criminals to commit a crime, they must have intent....
Words: 3157 - Pages: 13
...Classifying Crimes James Parkins CJ230: Criminal Law for Criminal Justice January 21, 2014 In this paper I will be covering many different things. I will be covering is some of the differences between both criminal and civil law. With that I will cover the goals and objectives, difference in remedies and outcomes, commencement of each case, and how the players in each system differ. After covering all of that I will give you a scenario and we will analyze it. Civil and Criminal Law Goals and Objectives The first thing that we will cove is the goals and objective of the criminal and civil laws. Civil laws are meant for one thing. That one thing is to protect an individual rather than the public interest. It works a lot with the constitutional rights of people. Criminal law is along the same lines with civil laws. The only difference is that criminal law is meant to protect the public and help maintain social order and stability. These are the objectives of the civil and criminal laws. Difference in remedies and outcomes As far as criminal law there are a multiple amount of possible outcomes. A list of possible is prison which could be state or federal, county jail, probation, etc. As far as the civil law goes, it is much different. Normally a majority of civil law outcomes are simply a monetary settlement (settlement involving money) or restraining orders. This explains the different possible outcomes of both criminal and civil law. Commencement of each case Now we...
Words: 919 - Pages: 4
...LS-03 Introduction to Law and the Legal Profession Unit 6: Criminal Law: Summary What constitutes discipline? What constitutes abuse? Different cultures – different cultural connotations – difficult to universalize Punishment in Schools: 31 states do not allow corporal punishment in schools; southern states allow teachers to discipline children. Now there is a tremendous emphasis in our culture on abuse/neglect of children. Death Penalty: there are many cases where people are exonerated after many years. At least they can get out and have freedom. They got rid of Apartheid – people who took a stand, i.e. Rosa Parks and Nelson Mandela “committed” civil disobedience – yet were the catalyst for new/better laws to evolve. Bullies in school is a problem – if teachers hit a child, it adds to corporal punishment. Does corporal punishment in schools have a positive affect? The evidence shows that countries an states that do not have a death penalty – murder rates are lower. Criminologists believe that having a death penalty in place – creates a cycle of violence. Are the shootings in the schools a result of corporal punishment? We must look at Colorado to explore this question. Identifying Criminal Law: Elements of a Crime – criminal law is straight forward. Every crime has 3 elements: GUILTY MIND: to punish intentionally wrong conduct OJ Simpson case – he was charged with murdering his wife and waiter on Goldman. The prosecutor had the burden of proof. OJs attorneys...
Words: 717 - Pages: 3
...Criminal Justice System Criminal Justice System Introduction Criminal justice changes in rules, procedures, and terms from state to state. However, the punishment exercised on criminals cannot vary from the standards established by the United States. A crime is classified as an act that violates the federal laws of America. Consequently, all the violations are subject to different severities of punishment. Crimes in particular can be as minimal as a traffic violation and become as severe as homicide. The severity of the crime will determine the severity of the punishment. The criminal justice system is designed in order to standardize a level of punishment to appropriately fit the crime committed. The criminal justice system is largely affected by constitutional law and has evolved significantly over time. Currently, the criminal justice system maintains itself to helping the process of reprimanding criminals. There are three elements of the system and there all valuable in the criminal justice system. The primary element is the police force. Police officers have the responsibilities to capture criminals, investigate, and testify in court based on what actions were witnessed. In some situations, police officers have the obligation to jail criminals directly from street while they await their trial dates. The second element is the court system. The court system is generally composed of a prosecutor, judge, and suspect who is referred to as the defendant in court...
Words: 1003 - Pages: 5
...Criminal Law Jordan Miller CJA 354 September 24, 2012 Kristin Mildenberger Criminal Law Former Chief Justice and President of the United States from 1909 to 1913, William Howard Taft once stated “Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever.” That statement currently remains to hold true. The first Supreme Court was called to assemble on February 1, 1790, at which time the powers and duties of the Supreme Court were established. The United States Supreme Court currently has one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices and is the highest judicial body in the United States. In the 2009 case of the Supreme Court vs. Joel Tenenbaum, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued former Boston University student Joel Tenenbaum for file sharing 30 songs he illegally downloaded from the Internet. According to Bloomberg (2012): The court, without comment, refused to hear Tenenbaums challenge to a law that let the recording industry collect thousands of dollars from individuals for such downloading. The jury was told to impose damages, set by US copyright law, of between $750 and $150,000 per violation. Jurors set a rate of $22,500 for each of 30 songs he downloaded. (para. 2) A jury subsequently ordered Tenenbaum to pay $675,000 in fines directly associated with each of the 30 illegally downloaded and shared songs. "I find it hard to believe that the legal system would uphold a six-figure sum against someone just for downloading music," Tenenbaum...
Words: 1350 - Pages: 6
...1. Actus reus is the Latin term used to describe a criminal act. Every crime must be considered in two parts-the physical act of the crime (actus reus) and the mental intent to do the crime (mens rea). Преступление — это общественно опасное, противоправное, виновное деяние дееспособного лица, за которое предусмотрено уголовное наказание. Crime - is socially dangerous , illegal , guilty act capable person, which provides criminal penalties. Crimes are defined by criminal law, which refers to a body of federal and state rules that prohibit behavior the government deems harmful to society. If one engages in such behavior, they may be guilty of a crime and prosecuted in criminal court. In today’s society, criminal behavior and criminal trials are highly publicized in the media and commonly the storyline in hit television shows and movies. As a result, people may consider themselves well-informed on the different types of crimes. However, the law can be quite complicated. There are many different types of crimes but, generally, crimes can be divided into four major categories,personal crimes, property crimes, inchoate crimes, and Statutory Crimes: * Personal Crimes – “Offenses against the Person”: These are crimes that result in physical or mental harm to another person. Personal crimes include: * Assault * Battery * False Imprisonment * Kidnapping * Homicide – crimes such as first and second degree, murder, and involuntary...
Words: 3016 - Pages: 13
...Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER 4 BOOK COVER Criminal Law Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Nature of Law • Rules of conduct inherent in human nature and in the natural order • Knowable through intuition, inspiration, and the exercise of reason, without need for reference to created laws Ten Commandments The U.S. Declaration of Independence Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved English Common Law • Originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes • The major source of modern criminal law in the United States • Judge-made law that is refined and changed by actual decisions that judges make when ruling on cases before them Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definition of the Rule of Law • The maxim that an orderly society must be governed by established principles and known codes that are applied uniformly and fairly to all of its members Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved The Categories of Law • Statutory law Substantive criminal law • Describes what constitutes particular crimes and specifies the appropriate punishment...
Words: 1129 - Pages: 5
...Guild Hall, High Street, Westhampton, WE2 5HL Dear clients, The two elements of a crime are the actus reus and mens rea. The actus reus is a crime comprises an actus reus, or a criminal act or omission, and a mens rea, or a criminal intent. Actus reus generally involves three elements or components: first one is a voluntary act or failure to perform an act, second is who causes, and third one is a social harm condemned under a criminal statute. The conduct itself might be criminal. For example the conduct of lying under oath represents the actus reus of perjury. It does not matter that whether the lie is believed or if had any effect on the outcome of the case, the actus reus of the crime is complete upon the conduct. Examples of conduct crimes are things like Perjury, Theft, Making off without payment, rape and possession of drugs or a firearm. The actus reus may relate to the result of the act or omission of the defendant. The conduct itself may not be criminal, but the result of the conduct may be for example it is not a crime to throw a stone, but if it hits a person or smashes a window it could amount to a crime. Causation must be established in all result crimes. Examples of result crimes are things like Assault, Battery, ABH, Wounding and GBH, Murder & Manslaughter and Criminal damage. For state of affairs crimes the actus reus consists of 'being' rather than 'doing' for example 'being' drunk in charge of a vehicle (Duck v Peacock 1949) or 'being' an illegal...
Words: 2256 - Pages: 10
...Student’s Name University’s Name Abstract In the United States of America, the law pertaining to crime against persons is complex; due to the principle of dual sovereignty that is a component of federalism. This essay entails analysis of murder as crime against persons. Murder cases are classified by the hierarchy of acts which entails: homicide, murder, manslaughter, and lastly justifiable homicide. English courts formed the body of common law on which United States jurisdictions relied on, in developing their murder statutes. Early English common law alienated murder into two broad categories: criminal and non-felonious. Historically, the intentional and deliberated killing of a person by another person was a criminal homicide and was categorized as murder. This analysis will discuss in details historical common law and current states statute in relation to crime of murder. Introduction Under the early United States law, murder was a criminal act that was punishable by death. It was termed as the unlawful execution of a person with hatred aforethought. According to Siegel (2006) book, Criminology, murder was also defined as a deliberated intent to kill. Currently, United Sates courts and jurisdictions have adopted the English common law. However the court has carried-out some amendment to various conditions that constituted criminal homicide. Modern statutes in general segregate criminal homicide into two wide categories: murder and manslaughter. Murder is further separated...
Words: 1467 - Pages: 6
...himself directly/indirectly, ill-gotten wealth in the aggregate amount or total value of P4,097,804,173.17, more or less, thereby unjustly enriching himself or themselves at the expense and to the damage of the Filipino people and the republic of the Philippines through any or combination or a series of overt or criminal acts, or similar schemes or means. Respectively or a total of more or less (P1,847,578,057.50); and by collecting or receiving, directly or indirectly, by himself and/or in connivance with John Does & Jane Does, commissions or percentages by reason of said purchases of shares of stock in the amount of P189,700,000.00 more or less, from Belle Corporation which became part of the Deposit in the equitable Bank under the account name of ‘Jose Velarde’. Petitioner wishes to impress upon the constitutionality of RA 7080 (An Act Defining and Penalizing the Crime of Plunder), as amended by RA 7659. He therefore makes a stringent call for this Court to subject the Plunder Law to the crucible of constitutionality mainly because, according to him, (a) it suffers from the vice of vagueness; (b) it dispenses with the "reasonable doubt" standard in criminal prosecutions; and, (c) it...
Words: 4457 - Pages: 18
...liability and criminal liability of this case. The Tolan vs. Cotton case interests me because the United States have so many police that are brutalizing citizens. In some cases the police officers are getting away with it. After reading, reviewing, and studying this case I have learn a lot about the criminal system and laws that men and women should obey. I will explain how the nine judges on the Supreme courts all came to a verdict against the police officer Jeffrey Cotton after he shot an innocent suspect. This people will explain how a person technical error can cause such harm mentally, physically, and finically on a single family. Sources, Purposes, and Jurisdictions Robert and Marian Tolan are mother and son that is suing a former officer by the name of Jeffrey Wayne Cotton for using deadly force against an unarm innocent man. Cotton was indicted in May 2009. According to "Find Law" (2014), “Sergeant Cotton and Officer Edwards violated Robbie and Marian Tolan's right to freedom from excessive force (under Fourth Amendment, incorporated in Fourteenth); and both Officers acted in furtherance of a City of Bellaire official policy of racial profiling and discrimination.” The purpose of the Tolans taking their case to the Supreme Courts was “because no genuine dispute of material fact exists for whether Sergeant Cotton's directing deadly force at Robbie Tolan and non-deadly force at Marian Tolan was objectively unreasonable in the light of clearly-established law, the Rule 54(b)...
Words: 792 - Pages: 4
...Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law LEG 320 July 25, 2014 Strayer University CRIMINAL CONDUCT AND CRIMINAL LAW Actus rea and mens rea are both important elements to convicting anyone for any crime. The actual commitment of a criminal act is actus rea. The guilty or criminal mind state is mens rea. Despite the fact that both actus rea and mens rea do not have to exist a conviction is still very feasible. When a criminal act is committed and the individual does not have to mens rea or guilty mind in some instances without the required mental state no crime is committed. Persons incapable of entertaining the required criminal mind because of legal insanity have not committed a crime. Working with individuals who have been diagnosis with mental retardation has really opened my mind to the element of mens rea when the individual has done something illegal. Some of the individuals have it in their mind that because the have been diagnosis with mental retardation they can not be held responsible for the criminal act they may commit or have committed, I have even heard many of the individuals say it. Does this mental state qualify them of the required state of mind for conviction? Immunity as a defense works in some cases not all. Immunity is the exemplification from criminal prosecution based on statues, the U.S. Constitution or international agreements. Diplomatic immunity is granted to those who are visiting foreign officials. Diplomatic immunity can also be waived by...
Words: 983 - Pages: 4
...Inchoate Offences in Canadian Criminal Law: Conspiracy and Counselling November 9, 2014 The Criminal Code of Canada is a systematically arranged body of law that defines various acts as crimes in Canadian society. It also serves as the legal doctrine that describes the assorted criminal behaviours specific to each criminal offence, as well as the correlating sentence to be administered upon an individual found to be in violation of the law. While some provisions under the Code address crimes that are ultimately perpetrated, such as the offence of robbery found under s.343 (1985), the Code also outlines offences in which a criminal act has yet to be physically carried out, or is “incomplete” (Verdun-Jones, 2011, p.180). These crimes are defined as inchoate offences, and represent a distinctive class of criminal offences in which the actions that precede detrimental conduct but “do not necessarily inflict harmful consequences in and of themselves” are deemed unlawful (Verdun-Jones, 2011, p.180). Consider a case involving the inchoate offence of conspiracy, or specifically, to commit a robbery. Two individuals (for this example named Slammer and Provis) agree to carry out an armed robbery, contrary to the provisions of s.343 of Criminal Code (1985). However, prior to attempting to commit the robbery, both Slammer and Provis are arrested due to the effective surveillance...
Words: 1288 - Pages: 6
...RUNNING HEAD: Criminal Law Paper Criminal Law Paper John Butler Bachelors of Science of Criminal Justice Maryland v. King, 569 U.S., On June 3, 2013 the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not a violation of the fourth amendment right by having your DNA swabbed while being booked into a detention facility. And that a simple swab on the inner check was no different than taking a photo or being fingered printed during the booking process. This case came to be after a individual was arrested and booked for assault and during the booking process the individual had the inner cheek swabbed as part of the booking process as part of Maryland DNA Collection Act (Maryland Act) . After this individual DNA was process per the Maryland Act, the DNA matched that of an unsolved rape from years earlier. Because of the match DNA this individual was convicted and sentenced of the rape. When appealing the verdict the individual argued that his fourth amendment right was violated. What interested me about this case was the taking of DNA during the booking process. I have always thought that giving a DNA sample was something that was voluntarily given, rather than being forced. Or if there was a court order to obtain one’s DNA. I know that many states across the county have been creating laws regarding the collection of DNA from individuals who are involved in the criminal justice system. Some states collect DNA during the booking process, while other states only...
Words: 845 - Pages: 4