...In the Supreme Court Case Griswold v. Connecticut, the court ruled in favor of Griswold because the court decided that the Law against contraceptions for pregnancy was unconstitutional as it violated the right of marital privacy. The court essentially stated that no one has the right to tell a married couple that they can or can’t have a baby a certain way because that is the decision for those two people to decide, and no one person or group of people can decide that for them, not even the government. The Supreme Court gave one of it’s reasoning’s to allow Griswold to give pregnancy contraceptions by saying that it went against his first amendment rights to freedom of speech. The Law did this because he wasn’t allowed to voice his opinion about what the couples should do and it restricted his right to teach. It also goes against our freedom of association because the people that were aware and associated with the party got in trouble and likely interrogated for something as simple as just having a meeting with Mr. Griswold and his associate Dr. Buxton....
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...There have been many supreme court cases that involve marriages in the United States. Three for example are Griswold v. Connecticut, Loving v. Virginia, and Lawrence v. Texas. Each of these cases have differ from one another but all tie into and issue with marriages. In the case Griswold v. Connecticut, the main issue was the use of birth control by a married woman. Estelle Griswold and Lee Buxton, were arrested 1961 and convicted as “accessories” for providing information, advice and instruction to married couples on how to prevent conception in violation of a state of Connecticut statute. At the time it was illegal for a married couple to use birth control. Buxton and Griswold were the Director and Executive Director for Connecticut’s Planned Parenthood league. Their claim was that couples not being allowed to use a form of birth control was a violation of the 14th Amendment. By definition, the 14th Amendment says, the constitutional amendment that concerns equal protection under the law, and the citizenship rights of Americans. Lower courts ruled in favor of the state. Therefore, it remained illegal for a married woman to use birth control. Griswold then took the case to the supreme court. The case started in early 1965. The Court lists the implied rights protected under each amendment of the Bill of Rights. The 1st Amendment includes the right to associate, the 3rd Amendment prohibits quartering soldiers in a person’s house without their consent, the 4th Amendment protects...
Words: 640 - Pages: 3
...although it is not stated it doesn’t mean they can be violated; which could mean that as citizens we have rights that the government can’t deny us even though it may not be said in the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees all citizens their rights on both the federal and state level. The closest case to this case at the time was the 1965 case of Griswold vs. Connecticut that dealt with the issue of use of contraceptives and the right of privacy whether a married couple could use them or not. This case turned from being about abortion to a person’s right to privacy similar to the Griswold case. When the case was first filed it was in the U.S. District Court in Texas where the court ruled in Roe’s favor for her merits because it violated her right to privacy but did not do anything to change the abortion laws. The ruling was based on the Ninth Amendment and the rulings from the Griswold case. Although Roe initially won in the district won, she was not satisfied because the abortion laws were still intact so her attorneys made an appeal to the U.S Supreme Court. The Supreme Court took the case but also the Doe vs. Bolton case as well because it related with abortion issues in Georgia. The Court had Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and eight other associate...
Words: 535 - Pages: 3
...even though they are not listed, it does not mean they can be violated. The founders of the Declaration of Independence rather than have a constitutional restraint created the ninth amendment: An example landmark court cases is Griswold vs. Connecticut, 1965. In the Griswold case, the Supreme Court decision found a new right in the Constitution that had never been mentioned before, a right to privacy. This pioneering decision by the United States opened the doors for many other similar contemporary court cases on the same issues such as Roe v. Wade. First of all, the Ninth Amendment of the Bill of Rights was voted for by 9 out of 12 states on December 15, 1791. Then the Amendment was issued into the United States Constitution on September 5, 1789. The Anti-Federalist Party...
Words: 819 - Pages: 4
...The Right to Privacy Ramon Rubalcava Redlands University Abstract [The abstract should be one paragraph of between 150 and 250 words. It is not indented. Section titles, such as the word Abstract above, are not considered headings so they don’t use bold heading format. Instead, use the Section Title style. This style automatically starts your section on a new page, so you don’t have to add page breaks. Note that all of the styles for this template are available on the Home tab of the ribbon, in the Styles gallery.] Keywords: [Click here to add keywords.] The Right to Privacy In this new generation the right to privacy is getting lower by the minute due to all of the social media and new electronic devices being invented daily. The right to privacy should not even be a question everyone should have the right to privacy to a certain extent. The right to privacy is a recent creation of little consequence other than cultural custom. The right to privacy is a big part if not the biggest part of everyone’s freedom because if anyone can come into anyone’s house at any given time or listen to all their calls and read all their text people will feel unsafe and without any freedom; It will feel like a prions where everything is being monitor. Everyone likes their privacy even if they do not have anything to hide just knowing that whatever they do or where ever they go will be only known to them and those they chose to share it with making them feel in control of their life...
Words: 1256 - Pages: 6
...There has been a case in the supreme court called Griswold v. Connecticut that resulted in Connecticut's proposition being refuted, the state wanted to pass a law that prohibited people from using birth control or any form of conception. Connecticut wanted to control people from their right of reproducing or intercourse, however, the U.S. declared it unconstitutional because they were violating people's privacy. The government has given us the freedom to decide how people reproduce and allow women to abort. However, there has been debates on the news recently about making it illegal to abort. Even though it is unmoral to abort, it is nevertheless women's right to do what they want with their babies/fetus. Some fetus that have been aborted...
Words: 586 - Pages: 3
...A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM?: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Kenji Yoshino The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges1 achieved canonical status even as Justice Kennedy read the result from the bench. A bare majority held that the Fourteenth Amendment required every state to perform and to recognize marriages between individuals of the same sex.2 The majority opinion ended with these ringing words about the plaintiffs: “Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”3 While Obergefell’s most immediate effect was to legalize same-sex marriage across the land, its long-term impact could extend far beyond this context. To see this point, consider how much more narrowly the opinion could have been written. It could have invoked the equal protection and due process guarantees without specifying a formal level of review, and then observed that none of the state justifications survived even a deferential form of scrutiny. The Court had adopted this strategy in prior gay rights cases.4 Instead, the Court issued a sweeping statement that could be compared to Loving v. Virginia,5 the 1967 case that invalidated bans on in––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge receiving financial support from...
Words: 15849 - Pages: 64
...Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut asserted the Bill of Rights contained penumbras that established a right to privacy. The absolutizing of privacy, as per Roe v. Wade, has led to the death of over 55 million unborn children. A loose constructionist interpretation of the Constitution was used as the execution device for these souls. A strict interpretationist view of the Constitution could have prevented the absolutization of the right to privacy created by Griswold v. Connecticut and expanded upon by Roe v. Wade that deprived over 55 million souls of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Strict interpretationism and loose constructionism...
Words: 1281 - Pages: 6
...One famous case is the 1992 court case of Planned Parenthood Vs Casey. is In the late nineteenth century a particular in reverse law was included Connecticut. It restricted not the deal or make of contraceptives but rather their utilization. The Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, Griswold, and its restorative chief, an authorized doctor, were sentenced under the statute as a frill after they offered exhortation to wedded couples on contraception. Griswold advanced the statute to the Supreme Court, where the inquiry was whether the statue damaged the Constitution. The Court was persuaded that it did, however it declined to end up particular about what provision of the Bill of Rights it disregarded. The court attracted notice to a "zone of security", which was a radiation made by different alterations. This "zone" became out of the privilege to protection verifiable in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The Ninth Amendment likewise alludes to its reality when it says that the count of particular rights does not block the presence of different rights listed. With Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), the Court set up that wedded couples have a "Right to Privacy" as a penumbra to the Bill of...
Words: 1226 - Pages: 5
...or executive actions in order to promote conservative or liberal objectives. | In the 1950s the Warren Court were seen to follow a liberal agenda and be judicially active. With a liberal and activist majority on the court the Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways. Warren Court Cases | 1954 Brown vs the Board | Based on 14th Amendment- ended segregation and overturned Plessey vs Fergusson | Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims 1962-4 | Based on the 14th Amendment- asserted the right of all votes to be of equal value- and lead to reapportionment across the USA. | Gideon v. Wainwright,1963 Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 | Right to legal representation and to be informed of rights. The ‘Miranda warning’ | Engel v. Vitale 1962 | Outlawed school prayer. Based on First Amendment. | Griswold vs Connecticut | Found a ‘right of privacy ‘in the 14th Amendment | Warren’s successor Warren Burger 1969-1986 appointed by Nixon as a conservative, extended some of Warren’s precedents most famously Roe vs Wade used the precedent set by the Griswold case. In Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) the court upheld the policy of ‘bussing’ school children to create mixed race schools. The Warren/Burger courts were criticised by conservatives who claimed they attacked family values and up held the rights of criminals. Republican presidents began to have since sought to create a more conservative court...
Words: 817 - Pages: 4
...the Constitution gives us certain liberties such freedom of religion and expression by the 1st Amendment, the right to bear arms by the 2nd Amendment, and the right to a speedy trail by the 6th Amendment. The Court has dealt with cases either philosophically, constitutionally, or both. “ The Supreme Court is distinctly American in concept and function, as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. Few other courts in the world have the same authority of constitutional interpretation and non have exercised it for as long or with much influences.” (www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/) One of the biggest delimas the court has faced is the original intent of the Constitution is in such cases as Marbury vs Madison 5 US 137 ( U.S. Supreme Court, 1803 ), and Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 ( U.S. Supreme Court, 1965 ), were originalist argued that courts cannot apply a general right to privacy in a politically neutral manner without protecting all sorts of illegal activities that are done in privacy, such as prostitution. In this paper I will attempt to show how the Court have dealt with the principle of Right to Privacy, active and passive euthanasia, and sanctity of life. I will also attempt to show how the court has dealt with stated principles philosophically and constitutionally. The first principle I will attempt to show how the court dealt with philosophically and constitutionally is the Right to Privacy. The U.S. Constitution contains no wording of the right to privacy...
Words: 2368 - Pages: 10
...Roe vs Wade is a very historic and well known court case in American history. It all started with a unmarried pregnant woman who lived in Texas and wanted to get rid of her baby by means of abortion. “Texas law prohibited abortions except to save the pregnant woman's life.” (Roe v. Wade) Roe took her case to court by filing suit against her district county attorney, Wade. “The circumstances and events within the proceedings of Roe v. Wade determined the legality of the abortion process, which is considered to be the medical procedure in which the pregnancy with regard to an unborn fetus is terminated; the plaintiff Jane Roe – which was a pseudonym granted to her in order to allow her to maintain her anonymity – maintained that the laws forbidding abortion instituted in the State of Texas were in direct violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 14th Amendments to the Constitution.” (Cases) The case was reviewed for two years, but the Supreme Court's final decision made abortions legal. Many disagreed with the court's reasoning and decision. Before anyone can make an opinion, it is good to know the background and details of the case. During the time period this case took place, people’s ideas about sexual relationships changed and became more liberal. Women were able to get birth control and other...
Words: 654 - Pages: 3
...Chapter 1 British Policy Incites a Rebellion - 1756-1763, Britain and France were in the Seven Years’ War, a conflict that had involved all major European powers. - Sugar Act (1764)- Including increase on taxes on imported goods such as molasses, coffee, and textiles. Monarchy: One person in charge. Very efficient, poor decisions. Oligarchy: Small group of people in charge. Can take form of a dictatorship. Nazi, Soviet Union (A junta: in charge of military small groups can also be a small group of religious leaders) Democracy: Power lies in the hand of the people. Basically a representative democracy, meaning we chose the people to make decisions. The dominant form of government today. Totalitarianism: The government was total control. Purpose is to implement the “utopian” society. Neg. side: They have to control everything, takes up a lot of resources. Gov. is inflexible, which leads to destruction of government. Authoritarianism: They don’t control everything, just enough. There isn’t a utopian vision. They control the military and the police. Only what they need to control. China is a midway point between Totalitarianism and Authoritarianism. Constitutionalism: A limited form of government. Powers are usually spelled out in a constitution that the government is obligated to follow. They are either being a democracy/monarchy. U.S is a democracy and England is a monarch. Hobbes: Claimed that we lived in a state of nature and not a good place to be. He believed were...
Words: 1972 - Pages: 8
...Due Process Crystal Groff Strayer University Professor Freeman Abstract We all wonder what the words life, liberty, and property derived from. In this paper I will be explaining what due process is and how it relates to life, liberty, and property. I will also explain where due process came from and what 2 amendments relate to due process. Before we start though I would like you to know that due process is there to protect the defendant under proving guilty. Define due process and its origin? Due process refers to a set of established legal principles, derived from the Constitution, that seek to protect the rights if citizens. It is done to insure that the government treats all the individuals properly and does not abuse there power by acting against the citizens in an arbitrary, oppressive, or capricious manner (WiseGeek, 2003). The most important fundamental level, is that it prohibits the government from taking any action against the individual that would result in the loss of liberty or property, without first making sure the individual notice of pending action, and has the opportunity to be heard. In every case, before the final decision can be made, the government has to provide the individual, through judicial or administrative procedures that are fair to the individual and impractical, and the ability to challenge the state action. The more serve the case of deprivation of liberty, the more rigorous the due process procedures afforded must be (WiseGeek...
Words: 912 - Pages: 4
...The law relating to the Family Brandon D. Allen 2011 Family law is of crucial importance to every individual, whether adult or child. Family law that regulates interpersonal relationships. Family law provides the legal framework for the establishment of marriage, the dissolution of marriage, the legal consequences of marriage and cohabitation, civil partnerships and the legal regulation of domestic violence. Much of the family law nowadays is concerned with the law relating to children. The status of a child, its parentage, and the rights of the child, the child’s welfare and the powers of the state in relation to the child are all central concerns. Family law has a wide and diverse. Some topics will require considerable more time than others. For example, the formalities of marriage, although detailed and rather complex, it should require much less of your time than the law relating to divorce. Family law is a growing body of cases which deals with the incorporation into English law. Family law is one of those fields in which you simply cannot avoid talking about, its those things that are happening in the outside would, economic changes, political changes, the sexual revolution, and so on. (Oxford University Press, 2003). Family law seems to be everywhere today. Abortion remains a litmus rest for political allegiances. Single-sex marriage divides state voters. Child custody...
Words: 1187 - Pages: 5
