Free Essay

Monkey Trial

In:

Submitted By shadyp24
Words 715
Pages 3
US History Since 1877
Critical Essay #1
Dr. Bachhofer

Scopes Monkey Trial Religious controversy has been around from the birth of this country and beyond. This country was founded by people, at least in part, trying to get religious freedom from Europe. People, even today in modern society, want the right to believe whatever they want and not have someone else’s beliefs shoved down their throats or the throats of their children. This need for religious freedom and the age old controversy of religious battles sparked a huge trial in the mid 1920’s famously known as the “Monkey Trial”. By 1921, Protestantism split up into two distinct groups. One of these groups was known as the modernists and the other was known as the fundamentalists. Both groups were caught up in a fight with each other for the countries attention. Like any fight over something important, both groups thought they were right. The Modernists were made up primarily of urban, middle-class people. Modernists were attempting to change religion around to fit their society that was based around science mainly. They believed that there was a chance that Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory had some merit. Above all else the rejected the idea that everything in the bible was 100% accurate. They left the door open for alternate interpretations of the bible, something that the fundamentalists despised. The fundamentalists (also known as the “defenders”) on the other hand consisted mostly of rural farmers. They fought hard for the traditional beliefs in religion and reject anything else. As the country grew, and as science and technology became stronger, they became fearful that traditional religion was losing its footing in this country. Their biggest opponent was Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory. They insisted that humans were created by God and openly challenged and idea that suggested otherwise. Fundamentalists traveled the south spreading the word and trying to get anyone and everyone to join in. In the mid-1920’s, fundamentalists started to gain some steam in the political arena. They succeeded in their demands for legislation to forbid the teaching of evolution in public schools. In 1925, Tennessee adopted a measure making it illegal to teach any theory that contradicted the Bible’s story in any way. This new law obviously gained a lot of attention around the country, especially from the modernist groups. All of this attention attracted a fairly new group formed to prevent legal social suppression known as the ACLU. The ACLU offered free counseling to any teacher that stood up to this law, and they found one named John T, Scopes. Scopes, a twenty-four-year-old biology teacher, agreed to have himself arrested. The ACLU sent their top gun in Clarence Darrow to defend Scopes. The fundamentalists also sent in one of its leading spokesmen named William Jennings Bryan to be an expert for the prosecution. The trial was like The OJ case of the 1920’s. Journalist from all around the country came to Tennessee to cover the trial and it became an instant circus. The enviable outcome of the trial was clear because Scopes clearly broke the law. The judge wouldn’t let any “expert’ evolution scholars testify and Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The defense though won in the end because in cross examination of the prosecutions “expert” witness William Jennings Bryan, the defense succeeded in making him look stupid. In testimony, which was broadcasted to most of the country, Darrow tricked Bryan into admitting the possibility that the Bible was open to other interpretation. This was a traumatic blow to the fundamentalists in what should have been a victory. The fundamentalists were isolated from most of the big Protestant churches and lost their political foothold. The Scopes Monkey Trial was an important time in history. It showed that religion shouldn’t be forced of people and should be left out of school. Religious freedom is one of the biggest rights that this country has. People have the right to believe whatever they want and no one side is right. It’s a fight that is still present today and our government now and again tries to get involved. I think this shows why the government shouldn’t be involved in religious matters and everyone should be allowed to practice and believe whatever they want.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Scopes Monkey Trial 1925

...The Scopes Monkey Trial 1925 The Scopes Monkey Trial demonstrates how religious fundamentalists used the power of the state to promote their view of society. Like the Prohibition laws used to legislate morality laws against the teachings of evolution in high schools attempted to legislate thinking. The Tennessee antievolution law (the Butler Act) came to national prominence in 1925. The American civil liberty union wanted to test the law and needed a teacher willing to be arrested for breaking the law. John T. Scopes the 24-year-old science teacher and a football coach at Dayton High School agreed to be the defendant in the case. He had thought the evolution theory at the school and had therefor broken the new law the punishment under the law was a 100$ fine under the law. In the summer of 1925 the case was brought to the Dayton courthouse with 150 members of the press in attendance. The state prosecutor was a fundamentalist William Jennings Bryan. Farmers in the families rushed though the heat wave as they were looking forward to Brian defending their bible against the idea “Everyone’s great grand pappy was a monkey”. Judge John. T. Raulston from Fiery Grizzard stated that the issue was not the truth of the evolution or the wisdom of the law it simply if the John T. Scopes had broken the law. Scopes agreed that he taught the theory of evolution and was fined a 100$. Brian had won the case but it was a hollow victory as Scopes defense Clarance Darrow had made the...

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Scopes Monkey Trial Essay

...The Scopes Monkey trial of 1925 is considered a success for the teaching of biology in the United States. Although John T. Scopes was found guilty and the christian plantiffs won, the spokemen for the case were labeled as silly in their explaination of concepts in the book of Genesis, such as Adam and Eve and Noah's Ark. Even after the violation of the Tennessee law, other states were less willing to propsing laws similar to the Butler Act (Cornish,2007,para.3). The trial was just the beginning of a century-long war between creationalists and scientists. The conflict also turns into a christian vs atheist debate, due to the overwelming amount of atheists who support the theory of evolution. After reading Randy Moore's article, I was surprised by the number of Americans who want creationalism to be incooperated in a biology curriculum. Based on statistics provided by Randy Moore, while half the U.S. Population support...

Words: 1191 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper

...The Scopes Monkey Trial The Trial of the Century, Scopes Monkey Trial, The Monkey Trial these are a few names the State of Tennessee v. John Thomas legal case could be called. This court case was an unusual one because the State of Tennessee had passed an antievolutionary law named the Butler Act that outlawed the teaching of evolution in the classroom (New World Encyclopedia). While the scopes trial looked like ballyhoo, because of its substance it was actually important to America because of its substance and final showdown. The Scopes Trial had almost a circus or carnival like element to it. Especially in the town of Dayton Tennessee where the trial was being held because of a multitude of revival tents and other various things (Pierce)....

Words: 407 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Scopes Monkey Trial Case Study

...1. Why is the “Scopes Monkey Trial” so historically significant? The Scopes Monkey Trial is historically significant because it is the first time that the creationist argument and the theory of evolution were debated within an education atmosphere. Also, it brought into question the legality of the government determining what can be taught in schools. 2. Why do you think the Supreme Court overturned the verdict on a technicality? I think the Supreme Court overturned the verdict on a technicality because the case was too controversial and divided people. So, the issue was not solved, but it was done before any further discussion on the matter could occur. So, the matter was overturned to avoid a public divide on the issue. 3. What are your...

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Chapter 21: The Scopes Monkey Trial

...Chapter 21: Scopes Monkey Trial The scopes monkey trial occurred because religious fundamentalists, who believed that God created life, believed that the theory of evolution was heretic. In early in 1925 state legislature of Tennessee passed a law forbidding public school teachers to teach the theory of evolution instead of teaching the story of Adam and Eve. John Scopes was a high school teacher in Dayton Tennessee who was a modernist, meaning that he believed in social sciences and evolution. In 1925 Scopes volunteered to serve in a test case and was arrested for teaching evolution in school. Scopes trial that summer became a headline event and though he won the trial, fundamentalism remained popular. 2nd Kkk In 1915, William J. Simmons,...

Words: 1199 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Scopes Monkey Trial, Inherit The Wind

...Modeled after the Scopes Monkey Trial, Inherit the Wind has the citizens of Hillsboro remain intransigent in their observance to Christianity and reject the concept of evolution, resulting in the trial that would bring attention from everywhere in the country. Referred to as the “buckle on the Bible Belt” (Act 1. Scene 1), the town is known for its strict adherence to its religion and puts a school teacher named Bert Cates on trail with the intent of imprisoning him for teaching evolution since it was illegal to do so. Although characters such as prosecuter Matthew Harrison Brady condemn Cates as a sinner and blame him for spoiling the minds of the town’s youth, he has never read the works of Darwin to understand why evolution would be taught. When questioned by the defense attorney Drummond, Brady...

Words: 452 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Scopes Monkey Trial: An American Legal Case

...The Scopes “Monkey” Trial was an American legal case in 1925 which involved a 24-year old high school teacher named John Thomas Scopes who was prosecuted for teaching the theory of evolution. The trial took place in Dayton, Tennessee on July 25th 1995. Scopes was accused of violating the Tennessee’s Butler Act by teaching Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. The Butler Act forbids the teaching of theory that goes against the biblical story of Creationism. Scopes was found guilty and was charged a fine of $100. In 1925, the Tennessee legislature passed the Butler Act which prohibits the teaching of the theory of evolution in all the universities, normal and all other public school in Tennessee. Any teacher who fails to abide the law would be fined not less than a $100 or more than $500. Other southern states followed suit. The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) offered to defend the teaching of evolution. Scopes agreed to purposefully incriminate himself so the ACLU could challenge the Butler’s Act....

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Scopes Monkey Trial Research Paper

...The Scopes Monkey Trial’s outcome determined the beliefs and morality of generations of Americans to come. As a result, Americans would give legitimacy to Darwin’s theory, and the decision would spark a widespread acceptance of evolution. Because Christianity did not have a legitimate Bible expert to aid in the defense of the law, the successive generations have been indoctrinated with a lie, and the future has suffered. Creationist were ill prepared for the storm that the Evolutionist had cleverly planned and painstakingly created. Bryan had been traveling the country speaking about the evil results of teaching evolution and had sparked the state of Tennessee to pass a law stating it was illegal to teach evolution in it’s schools.(Menton)....

Words: 370 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Inherit The Wind: The Scopes Monkey Trial

...Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was one of the most thoroughgoing scientific proposals in the galaxy. This theory presents that the living organisms found on the Earth today developed from simpler organisms in an extended, gradual process of natural selection. Darwin’s theory caused substantial controversy because it challenged existing thoughts about the origins of humankind, such as the formation story told in the book of Genesis in the Bible. This controversy split America, which was going through a significant social change during the phase, in which Darwin’s theories became universal. Inherit the Wind outlines the 1925 trial, Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes, often referred to as the “Scopes Monkey Trial.” In a compact city called Hillsboro, Bertram Cates sits behind bars for teaching his class about Darwin’s theory. I do not believe teachers should be able to teach what they want in classrooms. If the educators instruct on what is taught, then lack of continuity across the country with regard to education. Students in different states may end up learning completely different objectives. Part of the advantage of the United States is alike opportunity for all citizens. Therefore, I believe states should decide what is taught. Rachel Brown, the daughter of the town’s clergyman, also a teacher, urges Cates to plead guilty. Cates is edgy when...

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bert Cates 'The Scopes Monkey Trial'

...The Scopes Monkey Trial Essay I do not believe that Bert Cates abandoned God when he left the church to teach his students evolution. You can still pray or ask for forgiveness anywhere at any time you don’t have to be in church. Church is just the physical part of the Christian connection to god. Church is also where you go to get baptized or to confess your sins to your preacher. The Reverend was friends with the law enforcement, and they kind of worked together to get the entire town on their side singling out others. Slowly manipulating the town, that’s kind of how things were when this started. There were probably so many others like Bert Cates, that didn’t want to go to church nor liked going to church, but they still went because they...

Words: 344 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Five Monkeys and a Banana

...Things Are Done:  Start with 5 monkeys locked in a cage.  Hang a banana from the roof on a string and place a set of stairs under it.  Before long the monkeys will go to the stairs and start to climb toward the banana.  As soon as the first monkey touches the stairs, hose the other monkeys with cold water.  After a while another monkey makes an attempt with the same result. All the other are sprayed with cold water.  Pretty soon, when another monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.  Now, put away the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and goes to climb the stairs. To his surprise and horror, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he will be assaulted.  Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm!  Likewise, replace a third original monkey with a new one, then a fourth, then the fifth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs, he is attacked.  Most of the monkeys that are beating him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey.  After replacing all the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys have ever been sprayed with cold...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Who's Got the Monkey

...Management Time: Who’s Got the Monkey? In Ocken’s and Wass’ short story, “Management Time: Who’s Got the Monkey?”, a manager seems to be overwhelmed with the amount of problems that ha been brought to him by his subordinates. They approach him with a problem, or “monkey” and expect him to fix it, making it his problem, or his “monkey”. By the end of the day, he has too many monkeys on his back and too little time to “feed” them. His subordinates, ensuring that he has not missed the point will occasionally check up on him. This is what we call supervision (4). Instead of the manager being the one in charge, his subordinates have become his superiors. There are three kinds of management time to be considered. Boss-imposed time- used to accomplish tasks that can only be accomplished by the manager. If disregarded by the manager, there will be swift penalty. System-imposed time- used to suit demands from associates for dynamic backing. Ignoring these solicitations will additionally bring about punishments, however not generally as immediate and quick. Self-imposed time- used to take on tasks initiated by the manager. This type of time has portions that are taken up by the subordinate which is considered subordinate-imposed time. The portion left remaining belongs to the manager and is called discretionary time. No penalties are faced with self –imposed time because it was not known the intention of the manager to take on a task in the first place (Oncken and Wass 4). ...

Words: 709 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Psychology

...see if the reaction comes by a distinguish sound or decibel level. On the other hand, the experiment does show and interesting point, and that is how the different levels affect on different situations. How in some cases one can affect, but be totally numb on the other situation. The experiment that I liked the most was the monkey experiment, as it shows nature in its raw content, even though us humans are animals, we are contaminated by so many things that it almost feels like we are not part of nature anymore. As if our raw content was removed decades ago and we molded ourselves to a new being, separate from the others. Monkeys on the other hand, showed something great, in the experiment you can see that nature is so unpredictable, even in the most controllable scenarios, things don’t usually go as planned. There a thin line between what can be thought and what come in by nature, instinct or genetics. Scientist didn't fail at the monkey experiment, whether their goal was to try to teach monkeys to fear flowers or not, the experiment showed something else. As of right now, I don't know of anything that can come closer to that experiment of monkeys, as it set a great example for future researchers. Is it even possible to teach out animals out of their instincts and if so, can those teachings go from generation to generations? What...

Words: 388 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Meerkat

...in much of the Namib Desert in Namibia and southwestern Angola, and in South Africa. A group of meerkats is called a "mob", "gang" or "clan". A meerkat clan often contains about 20 meerkats, but some super-families have 50 or more members. In captivity, meerkats have an average life span of 12–14 years, and about half this in the wild. ------------------------------------------------- Name "Meerkat" is a loanword from Afrikaans. The name has a Dutch origin but by misidentification. Dutch meerkat refers to the "guenon", a monkey of the Cercopithecus genus. The word "meerkat" is Dutch for "lake cat", but the suricata is not in the cat family, and neither suricatas nor guenons are attracted to lakes; the word possibly started as a Dutch adaptation of a derivative of Sanskrit markaţa मर्कट = "monkey", perhaps in Africa via an Indian sailor on board a Dutch East India Company ship. The traders of the Dutch East India Company were likely familiar with monkeys, but the Dutch settlers attached the name to the wrong animal at the Cape. The suricata is calledstokstaartje = "little stick-tail" in Dutch. According to African popular belief (mainly in the Zambian/Zimbabwean region), the meerkat is also known as the sun angel, as it protects villages from the moon devil or the werewolf which is believed to attack stray cattle or lone...

Words: 251 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Who's Got the Monkey?

...Who’s Got The Monkey The article “Who’s Got The Monkey?” by William Onken, Jr. and Donald L. Wass is how to manage management times. A manager must understand the content of his work and do not attempt to take all the monkeys that not belong to him; otherwise, he will soon discover that he is not only drowning with the responsibilities but also robbing his subordinates the experience of learning. In the article, it clearly defines the three types of times that one needs to manage. First, the boss-imposed time is the time for accomplishing activities that assigned by the boss. Second, the system-imposed time is the time for supporting peers. Third, the self-imposed time consists of subordinate-imposed time, which is taken by his subordinates, and the discretionary-imposed time that is the time of his own. The key is one need to learn how to shorten the subordinate-imposed time and enlarge the discretionary-imposed time. By doing that, he can leverage his discretionary-imposed time to have the boss-imposed and the system-imposed time under control. One way to eliminate the subordinate-time is to ensure the subordinates initiate and take on the responsibilities. The subordinates shall schedule weekly meeting to review the status or any issues that arises together with the manager and other stake holders. The manager’s job is to provide assistant to the subordinates but not to perform the job for the subordinates. In this article, monkey is an analogy of responsibility...

Words: 772 - Pages: 4