Free Essay

When a Mishap Occurs

In:

Submitted By kwillie
Words 3267
Pages 14
When a Mishap Occurs
Keith A. Williams
110414

In the Air Force, mishaps occur regularly. This is unfortunate but, inevitable when you have a workforce of over 300,000 military members and 170,000 civilian personnel. Any mishap could create a crisis situation but, the severity of that mishap determines not only the response but the investigation to prevent recurrence. Categorically, mishaps are broken down by discipline, class and duty status. The disciplines are labeled as: Ground, Flight, Space and Weapons. Ground would be a mishap which occurred; you got it, on the ground. A car accident, a trip and fall at home (as military personnel are accounted for 24 hours a day) or a sprained back while lifting a box at work would all be considered ground mishaps. Flight mishaps are those that deal with aircraft. Aircraft are defined as manned as well as unmanned, such as Remote Piloted Aircraft (RPA) or as the media calls them drones. Space mishaps deal with space flight such as rockets and satellites. Weapons mishaps are those that occur when an explosive device, such as a grenade, missile or bomb incident occurs. All of these categories are then broken down by class from A-D. A Class A being the worse, whereas there is a loss of life or property damage over $2,000,000. A Class B mishap is one where there is a loss of a limb (leg or arm) or function of an eye(s) or property damage less than $2,000,000 but more than $500,000. A Class C mishap is when there are only lost workdays from work or property damage less than $500,000 but more than $200,000. A Class D mishap is when an individual has been placed on restricted duty or property damage less than $200,000. All of these categories are viewed from a status of on-duty or off-duty. Duty status mainly applies to military members as their on-duty or off-the-job mishaps are documented as well. Usually, duty status is only a factor during a ground categorized mishap. While ground mishaps occur more often than the others, flight or aircraft mishaps draw the most attention and are usually the most severe. The attention comes not only from the media but from leadership within the Air Force. For this paper, I will discuss manned aircraft because not only do you have the cost of losing an expensive asset, you also have the potential loss of life. That is the loss that an Air Force community struggles with the most.
Last year, the Air Force lost 30 aircraft in accidents (AFSAS, 12). Each time, a chain of events began to try to deal with the crisis that was in front of the particular base. Leadership has to make quick and rationale decisions that are guided by Air Force Instructions. Some get it right from the start and the process works smoothly. Others struggle due to poor guidance from individuals or poor planning. Most are probably somewhere in-between because regardless of how much guidance you have as well as how much you have prepared, when a crisis such as an aircraft crash occurs, it will have some unforeseen events that will require leadership to make an out-of-the-box decision. In my 22 years as a safety professional, I have been intimately involved in several aircraft mishaps. Each one required our safety team’s full attention for several days and some required our attention for 30 days or more. In all of them, we lost at least one individual. Some involved multiple aircraft, some involved a large loss of life and some only involved a single aircraft. Regardless of the number of people or aircraft our safety offices responded in a decisive and professional manner, even as others seem to panic or become unsure of their own responsibilities. On the next few pages, I will take you through the entire process of when an aircraft mishap occurs.
It could be at anytime during the day or night, any weekday or weekend but traditionally an aircraft mishap occurs during the day during a weekday (AFSAS, 12). This is no doubt due to the majority of Air Force flying operations occur at that time. It usually starts with an early warning from the aircrew of a problem usually termed as an In-flight Emergency (IFE). The IFE is declared from the aircrew to the air controllers. At this point, a call via the “crash net” is sent out to various agencies through-out the installation that an aircrew has declared an IFE. The agencies are; Security Forces, Fire Department, Base Operations, Civil Engineers, Hospital, Safety and Base Leadership. This crash net is managed by an agency called Base Operations who are manned 24 hours. As first responders, the Fire Department, Security Forces and Hospital go just short of the runway where the aircraft will land and wait for further instructions. On a typical Air Force installation, this scenario could occur many times in a day and the aircraft that declared the emergency land without incident. After a few cursory checks by the Fire Department, the aircraft is turned over to aircraft maintenance personnel or if able, the aircrew will taxi the aircraft to its intended location and then maintenance will take over. However, the first responders must be prepared for the unexpected and not assume anything. If the aircrew is unable to safely land the aircraft, the actions by the first responders is critical to the mishap being controlled early. If the aircraft crashes, the first thing the first responders will attempt to do is determine if the aircrew came down with the aircraft or did they eject. For this, the controllers in the tower are important. Because of the sight advantage point they have, they assist can the first responders for indications that the aircrew did or did not leave the aircraft. If the aircrew stays with the aircraft, then the fire department goes into action to eliminate any hazards i.e. fire, chemical spills, etc before extracting the aircrew. Fire Department personnel are highly trained for any scenario that could occur to include the types of hazards an aircraft may have upon crashing. Some of these hazards could be highly toxic so before they go into action, they quickly assess the situation to ensure they have the proper protective gear to handle the situation. Once the aircrew is able to be removed from the aircraft, then the fire department begins to put out the fire, contain fuel etc. At this time the medical personnel take the aircrew and begin the process of determining injuries that the aircrew may have suffered. Also, depending on the type of aircraft, the medical personnel may ask for assistance from bio-medical personnel who can monitor the air surrounding the crash-site to assist in determining what if any additional personal protective gear may be required for anyone near the site. Simultaneously, security forces personnel begin to establish a perimeter around the crash site. Most of this is done in the first 30 minutes of an aircraft mishap with the biggest factor being the hazard of a fire or fumes that could easily slow this entire process down.
With the first responders in place, the safety office has an individual arrive at the crash site and monitor the activities closely. While this individual does not interfere with any of the first responder operations, they are crucial in making sure that the crash site is left intact as much as possible for the safety investigation team. As all of this orderly chaos is occurring, the same agencies that received the initial notification are notified again through the crash net that the aircraft has crashed. A few minutes later they may be notified to report to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). When they are notified is determined by the fire chief, who is the On-Scene Commander and is in communication with base leadership via mobile phone in determining if any hazards exist for personnel to safely respond to the EOC. Representatives who respond to the EOC are: Aircraft Maintenance, Civil Engineer, Contracting, Force Support, Safety, Medical, Logistics, Security Forces, Legal, Chaplain, Public Affairs, Alert Photographer and Flying Operations. Along with representatives from these agencies, base leadership (Wing Commander and Group Commanders) are there. There are usually 4 Group Commanders; Aircraft Maintenance (MX), Medical (MDG), Mission (MSG) and Operations (OG). The MSG commander is usually in charge of the EOC. Once representatives and leadership arrive, in which they have 30 minutes, an initial briefing is given with the latest information. When a serious mishap happens on-base, the temptation is for leadership to go to the crash site to see the damage first-hand, however, this hinders the first responders because now the fire chief who is in charge of the crash site is now having to deal with additional individuals in the area and all of those individuals are above him or her. Of course that means they have to focus less on the task at hand because they are coddling leadership. While that should not be the case, unfortunately it is. If everyone follows protocol and reports to the EOC, after the initial briefing, every representative begins to use their respective checklist for the crisis that has been briefed. These checklists are from the base mishap response plan which every installation must have. With very few exceptions, every possible scenario has been vetted through exercises, training and subject matter experts to ensure every crisis can be handled in an appropriate and manner. The checklists are identified according to the event and for some agencies the event may dictate that their checklist is very short while another agencies checklist being lengthy and vice-versa. Ordinarily an update is given every 15 minutes on the status of the events that are taking place at the crash site and at that same time, each agency representative gives the status of their ongoing activities. The first 60 minutes are critical for the EOC as everyone has a major role in an aircraft mishap and if one representative is late in reporting, there could be a domino effect throughout. The EOC is the brain-trust of the crisis and as events move along, each EOC representative role and responsibilities increase exponentially.
Each EOC representative has an important role. Aircraft Maintenance gathers the maintenance documents for the mishap aircraft as well as makes available anyone who performed work on the aircraft in the last 24 hours available for drug testing. Aircraft Maintenance will also be responsible for gathering the mishap aircraft and placing it in a hangar for the safety investigation board. Civil Engineer assist with providing portable lighting, fencing for security purposes at the crash site as well portable facilities for investigators, team members etc. Contracting provides funding for any contract work that may need to take place to facilitate the mishap. While on the installation, the role of the contracting representative could be small, if the crash occurred off-base, their role could be critical. Force Support would provide food for the EOC as well as on-base lodging for members who may not be able to go home due to the crisis becoming an around-the-clock operation. Force Support’s most crucial role would be if there is a casualty. They are responsible for notifying next of kin as well as dealing with pay, benefits, life insurance pay-outs etc. They also are the lead on assembling the team to recover any human remains. Safety’s role is two-fold. First they ensure all EOC members are aware of any possible hazards at the site so they can relay this to their respective work-centers who may eventually be involved in recovery operations. Second they prepare for the Interim Safety Investigation Board (ISIB). The Safety EOC representative is in contact with the safety representative at the crash site. Medical handles any updates to the health status of the aircrew. The EOC representative is in constant communication with the medical personnel at the crash site. Logistics will assist with providing transportation once the wreckage is ready to be moved as well as provide vehicles for safety board members. Security Forces keeps EOC members aware of any potential security issues at the crash site and is in constant contact with personnel that are securing the site. They also keep an update on the safe route to the crash site. Legal is there as an advisor to leadership for any potential claims that could be processed against the Air Force. Their role would be greater if the mishap occurred outside the installation, however, there is still potential with an on-base mishap for claims if a part fell off the aircraft before it crashed and struck someone’s vehicle or if the aircraft dumped fuel prior to crashing and that fuel landed in a farmer’s field. The Chaplain Representative is there as a spiritual advisor. Their role is increased if there is a casualty. They not only would assist the family or families affected but also would be there to assist personnel who recover human remains. Public Affairs will prepare any statements that need to be released to the public. Also, they would handle all media request. Base leadership (usually the Wing Commander) usually will be the only individual outside of the Public Affairs Representative to speak to the local media and only after receiving guidance from Public Affairs. The Alert Photographer’s role is to capture the mishap site for the ISIB. Their expertise is critical to ensure the ISB has a visual scene because the crash site will eventually be cleaned up. The Flying Operations representative is there to advise on any flying operations that have been impacted by the mishap such as if other aircraft were diverted because the airfield is closed. All of these representatives have alternate EOC members in case they happen to not be available the day or time the mishap occurs. Also, each representative has personnel back at their respective work-centers that assist them in gathering any information that they need. Until the mishap site is deemed safe by the Fire Chief, EOC personnel stay at the EOC. Depending on the severity and complexity of the crash, this could be several hours. All of this is magnified if the crash site is off the installation; however each Air Force installation has a mutual agreement with the surrounding communities that they are in charge of any military aircraft crash site.
While all of this is going on, safety has gathered names to be on the ISB. These names are given to leadership for approval. Before given to leadership the names have already been vetted for qualifications such as experience with safety investigation training, knowledge of the mishap aircraft, possible alibis such as upcoming personal leave, medical issues etc. The safety office is required to maintain a list of anyone base-wide that has had safety training and update it monthly for this reason. At a minimum, the ISIB will consist of; Board President, Investigating Officer (must be someone who is qualified to fly the mishap aircraft), Maintenance Officer, Medical Officer, Life Support Officer, Airfield Officer (air controller qualified) and Recorder (AFI 91-204, 12). Once the list is approved, the ISB members are told to report to the Wing Safety office. The Wing Safety office is also where the mishap aircraft maintenance records and the mishap aircrew medical records are delivered. Once the ISIB members arrive at the safety office, they are given the latest information on what has occurred. They are also given a refresher briefing on the do’s and don’ts of the investigation process. Both of these briefings are given by the Safety EOC representative. After the briefings, the ISIB is given their respective investigation kits (which are maintained by the safety office) shown the pre-determined location where they will be performing the investigation and issued vehicles. An ISIB is replaced by an outside Safety Investigation Board (SIB) within 3-5 days but their work is critical because the gathering of witness statements and other data is best done in the early stages of an investigation for accuracy purposes. The SIB initially has 30 days to complete their investigation (AFI 91-204, 12). Some members from the ISIB may stay on the SIB but at a minimum the board president will be replaced.
Once the mishap scene is deemed safe, the fire chief turns everything over to the EOC. As stated earlier, depending upon the size of the aircraft, the number of victims involved and any collateral damage from the wreckage, the fire chief may be in control of the scene for a few hours. The EOC commander will come out to the scene with other base leadership to survey the sight first-hand. At this point, the scene is turned over to the ISIB. Regardless of the time-frame when this all occurs, the Wing Commander releases an electronic message to other Air Force bases world-wide within 2 hours stating that an aircraft has crashed. The message gives only a few details (type of aircraft, time of day, weather conditions, the number of aircrew on board) and states that further information will come through safety channels. Within 8 hours, the ISIB releases their preliminary message. Concerning the local media, the Wing Commander will address them within 4 hours of the mishap taking place. Of course, the probability of phones ringing across the base is high with folks outside the base wanting to know information but, with the scene controlled, there really isn’t much information that can be gathered by those outside the EOC and ISIB. The individuals in the EOC and ISIB know that they do not discuss any details of the mishap with the media or with anyone else. Once the scene is turned over to the ISIB, the alert photographer goes out with them and begins to capture the scene. The scene has only been disturbed for fire-fighting purposes so if there are casualties, they are left in place (likely still in their cockpit seats). Once the scene has been captured with measurements, photos etc and remains if any are removed the wreckage is moved to a hangar for further investigation purposes. In the perfect scenario, this whole process takes less than 8 hours.
A perfect scenario is usually wishful thinking as my experience has shown that this initial process takes 12-16 hours. After the initial process, the safety investigation is vital to prevent recurrence of this type of mishap again. The safety report along with feasible recommendations is compiled and then presented to a 4-Star General for approval. The report is disseminated to every Air Force base with an aircraft like the mishap aircraft. All recommendations must have action taken before they are closed. Once all recommendations have been closed, the report is officially closed by the Air Force Safety Center and the report is archived.
I believe the Air force has a first-class response plan for any crisis. The key is preparation and because we exercise every scenario in our plans annually, we are ready if and when a mishap occurs.

Bibliography
Air Force Safety Automated System, https://afsas.kirtland.af.mil//
Air Force Instruction 11-202, Flight Operations General Flight Rules, June 2006
Air Force Instruction 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, June 2012
Barton L., Crisis Leadership Now, October 2008
Joint Base San Antonio Mishap Response Plan, 2012

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Negletct Paper

...between negligence, gross negligence and malpractice. I will also cover my opinion about the situation, agreement or disagreement deciding whether it was a mishap or negligence, the importance of documentation, the ethical principles that serve as a guide for nursing. Negligence is not being diligent. It is one of the legal issues that all healthcare provider are prone to participate unintentionally. Guido (2010 stated, “Negligence denotes conduct lacking in due care. Negligence include doing something that the reasonable and prudent person would not do” (p. 92). Negligence can occur anytime and in any areas of the healthcare environment. However, negligence most likely happens with old people in health care setting, for example, nursing home, hospitals and boarding care facilities. Some of the common negligence examples include failure to provide adequate nutrition, medication error, physical injury, and failure to turn patient that lead to a poor skin integrity. Gross negligence is more serious than negligence. The difference between the two of them is the degree of carelessness or inattention. Negligence is when a person fails with the standard of care not intentionally and gross negligence is a complete reckless conduct. Convalescent Services Inc. V. Schultz ( as cited in Guido, 2010) said, that the gross negligence is when the care giver is aware of the risk involved, but proceeded in conscious indifference to the rights and safety of the patient (p. 511). This action cause...

Words: 1318 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Aviation Safety Program

...AVIATION SAFETY PROGRAM Name Professor’s name Course Date Abstract The paper seeks to look into some of the critical issues concerning safety measures in the commercial aviation industry. It focuses more on the concept of stress in Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) and how high stress levels can affect the performance of ATCs. Further emphasis is laid on the various measures that can be put into place to address some of the safety issues in commercial aviation industry through the risk management strategies. Several aspects of the whole case arise in the whole program of addressing the issue. It becomes a matter of collective responsibility in the bid to address safety issues and come up with modalities to mitigate any safety threats in the future. At the end, we realize that all the players in the industry have the specific roles to play towards the program. Introduction In an increasingly competitive global environment, where the scramble for resources and the search for tangible opportunities seem to have overtaken any other global undertaking, the importance of commercial aviation cannot be overemphasized. Commercial aviation plays a very central role in the overall growth of any economy across the world. It is therefore imperative to look into the key issues that govern the aviation industry to ensure its success and proper functionalism. The concept of aviation security comes in as one of the most pressing issues in this regard. The...

Words: 3230 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Fireworks

...Analysis When the determination has been made to change a business’s entity it is important to understand what entity would be best suited for their business needs. Acme Fireworks is a sole proprietorship that is growing fast, the owner is considering changing the business entity. The decision that needs to be made is which entity will best suit their advancing needs. Acme Fireworks can choose between three entities: a partnership, corporation, and limited liability company (LLC). There are pros and cons for each of the different entities. When taking into account the current personal liability, if the contracts already in place are valid, employment needs to fulfill the large orders, and defining the different types of entities, my recommendation for Acme Fireworks would be to become a corporation. Just about everyone in the United States has some personal experience with fireworks, either from Fourth of July or New Year's Eve celebrations. Fireworks have always been dangerous and have caused, and continue to cause, serious and tragic accidents. Every year injuries both minor and major are caused by fireworks. Potential personal liability for injuries to consumers caused by the firework products is inevitable. When the firework explodes, it can send out many burning hot embers, or if it is positioned in the wrong place it can set houses or nature on fire. Fireworks can even be a dangerous weapons in the hands of vandals. However, not all mishaps due to fireworks occur as a...

Words: 318 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Negligence Paper

...Negligence Paper University of Phoenix Health Law & Ethics Negligence Paper Being a medical professional has many challenges when dealing with direct patient care. Sometimes in the best of circumstances, incidents occur with patients that cause undue harm. This paper will differentiate between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. It will also discuss the article “Amputation Mishap; Negligence” from the Neighborhood newspaper. It will discuss the importance of documentation and the ethical principles that would guide my practice as a nurse. Negligence can be defined as the failure to use reasonable care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in like circumstances. (West, 1998). Negligence occurs when a medical health professional fails to perform his or her duties with the patient in question. If a nurse fails to give medications as ordered, and as a result the patient's condition worsens or he dies, the nurse may be found negligent. If a nurse has inadequate nursing skills or fails to pay attention to tasks, it may result in a suit of negligence against a nurse who fails to provide approved standards of care. A good nurse knows their duties and has good communication between the patient and the physician. The nurse knows board regulations and practices within legal guidelines. Gross negligence can be defined as a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or...

Words: 1132 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Negligence Paper

...Negligence Paper HCS478 September 22, 2014 Amputation Mishap The article of the "Amputation Mishap," located in (Pearson Health Science, 2014) Neighborhood News, season 3 episode 7 is about a 62-year-old gentleman who went into the hospital to have his right leg amputated, but instead the wrong leg was amputated. He received a below the knee amputation of his left leg. The reason that he was having his right leg amputated was because he is diabetic and has poor circulation in his right leg. The surgery did not correct his problem but instead created bigger problems, because he still has the leg with the poor circulation and will most likely still need his right leg amputated. This was a huge mistake that the hospital staff has made. The incident of the wrong leg being amputated is a result gross negligence. This paper will be discussing the difference between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. It will also cover my opinion about the situation, deciding whether it was a mishap or negligence, the importance of documentation, the ethical principles that serve as a guide in the nursing practice in this situation, and how documentation should be done to satisfy ethical and legal requirements. For negligence or malpractice to be present there is a couple of things that needs to be proven such as a duty owed to the patient, breach of duty to the patient, foreseeability, causation, injury and damage. In order for there to be negligence, it has to be an injury...

Words: 1261 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Who Is John Krakauer's Suicide

...The climbers' experience in mountain climbing varies greatly from some well qualified cambers, and some who must rely dominantly on the guides. Despite a variety of mishaps, the primary death doesn't truly occur until about hafway through the book. From that time on, death is something all the climbers become well acquainted with. The actual summit push is when everything begins to collapse. Rob Hall appoints a 2:00 pm turn-around time, which means that everybody who has not truly reached the summit by then should turn around, no matter how close he or she is. That day, only Krakauer and a couple of other climbers make it to the top before 2:00 pm. The other members of his group reach the top as late as 4:00 pm, despite the 2:00 pm turnaround time. Among the later arrivals to the top is Rob Hall and another member, Doug Hansen. They arrive just behind another climbing group guided by Scott Fischer. A storm hits the summit that afternoon, and Krakauer catches only the tail end of it before he successfully...

Words: 538 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Essay

...----------------------- Energy Trace Barrier Analysis (ETBA) – Qualitative analysis technique used to identify hazards by tracing energy flow into, thru, & out of a system. “Energy hazard” is defind as an energy source tht adversely impacts an unprotectd or vulnerable target. Assessment is conductd by following the energy path to determine if adequate controls are in place to assure undesird energy release does not occur.– Energy flow is tracd through the system operation & energy transfer points are identifid– Barriers to ento energy flow are evaluatd to determine adequacy • ETBA process can be applied at any stage of the project lifecycle & can be very useful for:– Systems design –Developing procedures(e.g., lockout--‐tagout). – Planning/judging operational readiness. – During mishap investigation or making “safe--‐to--‐enter” decisions at mishap sites. ETBA Approach • Examine system & identify all energy sources • For each energy source, trace its path through the system • Identify all targets tht could be vulnerable to the energy source • Identify all barriers in the energy flow path • Determine if existing controls are adequate. Energy Source– any material, mechanism, or process tht contains potential energy tht can be releasd •Electrical •Mechanical •Chemical •Radiation• Sonic• Thermal• Nuclear• Pneumatic• Hydraulic• Others Energy barrier --‐ any design or administrative method tht prevents energy from being releasd or prevents a hazardous energy source from reaching a...

Words: 2026 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Uav for Disaster Surveillance

...certification of UAV system very rapidly. The first part of this report provides a brief introduction regarding the failure of the components. The second part discusses about the System Test and validation of the UAV. The last part of the report analyzes the human factor issues involved in the UAV. Introduction The UAV is not a new concept as it was in the situation of First World War. The roles and responsibilities that it carries has increased its utilization in the field of defense, disaster surveillance etc. Increment in utilization has accompanied by more number of failures rates compared to commercial and conventional airframes. There is about 1 per 100,000 flight hours’ general aviation mishap which includes UAV and about 1 per 1000 flight hours that includes military UAV. If these mishaps is to be calculated the failure rates of UAV is about 25% [ (Tvaryanas, Thompson, & Constble) ]. Despite of failures many forms of...

Words: 2630 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Nfl Case Summary

...Shortly after this occurred, two situations would occur that would affect Magid’s career negatively. First, Elvis Dumervil would inform Magid that he no longer required his services as an agent. Second, Magid would receive notice from the players association that he was suspended and fined because of the situation with Dumervil. At the time, the Broncos has been short on salary cap space and were asking Dumervil to restructure his contract to make $8 million per year instead of the $12 million per year he was scheduled to earn. The backstory behind the Broncos cap situation was that “Denver ended up with a 2013 cap spend of $120.9 million, leaving...

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Abcdef

...gained wide acceptance and has been used by healthcare industry, emergency services organizations, aviation industry, and safety industry since it was developed. It is also known as cumulative act effect. According to a survey, in most of the cases, there can be four levels of failure for an accident: unsafe supervision, unsafe act of themselves, organizational influence, and preconditions for unsafe acts. James T. Reason, in his Swiss Cheese Model developed defenses of organization against the failure and represented barriers as slices of Swiss cheese. And individual weaknesses are shown by the holes in the slices as part of the system, and all holes are different in position and sizes in those slices. The failure of the system occurs when holes in slices simultaneously align in aggregate, giving permission, as James Reason's said “a trajectory of accident opportunity", so that in all the defenses, jeopardy passes through all holes, which causes failure. Discussion The theory of James T. Reason involves mathematical analysis and is complicated and also involves underlying and active failures. Swiss cheese model applies here in the way that I can do to prevent the Swiss cheese presenting on training floor. It means as a healthcare administrator I have to prevent...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Frozen Rock-Solid

... Ontario, began to receive calls from angry customers across Canada who were upset because the chemicals they were receiving were frozen rock-solid. The reason: nobody in the company knew enough about the retiree’s job to make sure that the chemicals were properly transported during the winter. A minor oversight? Not quite. It cost the company $1.5 million. Other incidents at GM have also been reported. For example, 400 perfectly good carburetors were accidently destroyed at a cost of $300,000 because the worker who kept them off the scrap list retired. It has also been reported that a $250,000 car prototype was crushd into scrap metal because the employee who was responsible for it was transferred. Incidents like these are known to occur at other companies. (Source: Livesey, B (1997, November). Glitch doctor. Report on Business Magazine, pp.96-102. Reprinted with permission of Bruce Livesey. Questions 1. Why do you think this is an important story to tell company executives and managers? What is the main point of the story? This important story highlights the need for a comprehensive training and development...

Words: 876 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Dirty Dozen

...Dirty Dozen Twelve of the most common human factors that are related to aircraft accidents or incidents are called the Dirty Dozen. These factors have been identified to affect people and make them to make the poor decisions. The concept of the Dirty Dozen was created in 1993 by Gordon Dupont, he was working for Transport Canada during this time, while he was creating a training program on human factors in aviation. It is now recognized as the foundation of the aviation industries human factor in aviation maintenance. (Adams, 2009) Lack of communication This is one of the more important parts of the Dirty Dozen. Communications are a two way street that has to do with the person who is giving the communications to the person receiving the communications. During verbal instruction it is common the as little as 30% of a message is received. It is safe practice to keep important messages written down so there is not a lack of communications. Some maintenance outfits use log books so that other shifts can refer back to what was done and by who. Verbal messages need to be relatively short with key things being emphasized on. As a person that is getting instructions it is very important no to assume anything and to have things clarified. (Adams, 2009) Distraction Distractions are anything that can take the attention of a person during a task. There are distraction during work that cannot be removed and heave to be worked with. Noises are a key...

Words: 1737 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Fp 101 Appendix E

...Matrix |Type of Insurance |Functions |Example of Company |Coverage Characteristics | |Auto |This kind of insurance defends the car against |AAA, State Farm, Geico, Farm Bureau Insurance. |This assists to pay for the damages to a person’s own | | |responsibility and property dangers. | |car and others. This also insures personal injuries | | | | |happened in a car mishap. It additionally reduces the | | | | |responsibility for asset dangers. | |Home |This kind of insurance coverage defends against |AAA, State Farm, Liberty Mutual |Assists to protect or decrease the sum of damage from | | |responsibility as well as property dangers of a house.| |things like fire, and criminal damage. This might also| | | | ...

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Fp 101 Insurance Matrix

...your car against responsibility and property dangers. AAA, State Farm, Geico, Farm Bureau Insurance. This assists you to pay for the damages to a person’s own car and others. This also insures personal injuries that happened in a car mishap. It additionally reduces the responsibility for asset dangers. Home This kind of insurance coverage defends against responsibility as well as property dangers of a home. AAA, State Farm, Liberty Mutual. Assists to protect or decrease the sum of damage from things like fire, and criminal damage. This might also decrease the sum up front. Health A typical health insurance plan provides four primary functions: provisions for routine care, emergency medical assistance, chronic condition treatment and pharmaceutical care Kaiser, Humana, Blue Cross Blue Shield Health insurance covers the cost of medical or hospitalization care as a result of an illness or injury that occurs or is manifested while the policy is in force. Like other kinds of insurance, the benefits are payable in return for the insured paying a premium. Disability Disability insurance protects against the loss of income due to disability. Colonial Life, AIG, Liberty Mutual It provides a source of replacement income, for a stated period of time, when the insured is unable to work because of an illness or an accident if that illness or accident is not excluded from the scope of coverage. Life In business, it plays a major role in strategic planning for future operations. Families...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Negligence

...Negligence Latasha Adegboruwa University of Phoenix Health Law and ethics HCS/478 Lynda White April 18, 2011 Negligence “Registered nurses have more professional accountability than at any other time in the history of nursing. As a result, nurses must confront the fact that they now owe a higher duty of care to their patients, and by extension, are more exposed to civil claims for negligence than ever before”(Weld and Bibb, 2009, p 2). “Negligence is described as failure to use such care as a reasonable prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances” (Weld and Bibb, 2009, p3). Common examples of negligence are malnutrition, inadequate hydration, physical injury was done, and it was the result of the nurse’s care or lack thereof. There are five main elements in a nursing negligence case and all five elements have to be proven for a case to be valid 1. The nurse had a duty to perform. 2. The appropriate care was not apparent in the situation. 3. There was a breach of violation of care 3. There was injury proven to result from the nurse’s negligence and 5. There is proof that damages occurred as a direct result of the situation. (Avery, 2009). Gross negligence is a more serious form of negligence and goes further than carelessness. While regular negligence is seen as a person falling below the standard of care, gross negligence is seen as complete failure to show care and in fact implies recklessness or a willful disregard for the safety...

Words: 1167 - Pages: 5