Premium Essay

Why Is John Locke A Good

Submitted By
Words 469
Pages 2
About John Locke, he is a philosopher from the 1600s and had ideas about how humans are in their natural habitat. His theory was that people were born as a ball of clay and the job to mold that clay into something good was the job of the environment the baby is born in. The ball of clay would be molded by people or things in the environment. So if someone was in a bad environment like their parents or a very close friend are doing drugs or are in a gang, his theory would say that he would get involved with that. If the baby was in a good and nurturing environment the baby would be very good. To prove John Locke’s theory is true I came up with an example, my friend Anna was born a swimmer because her parents raised her in an environment around

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

How Did John Locke Influence The Two Practices Of Civil Government

...John Locke made the most influence on the world compared to Machiavelli. Machiavelli and John Locke both had about the same effect on the world even though they were different ideas. Niccolo Machiavelli had amazing ideas and taking power and politics. Even though Niccolo wrote his book in the 14th century his ideas are used all the time in todays day. Many rulers and politicians use his book as a guide on how to rule. Niccolo wrote the prince because he wanted to show people how ruling shouldn’t be. John Locke did the “Two Treatises of Civil Government”, an essay concerning human understanding, and “The Social Contract.” The “Two Treatises of Civil Government” are essays that showed the ideas of personal government, and democratic nations. The essays laid out a basic outline for our governments today. An essay concerning human understanding laid out a lot of ideas about the country. It talked about how “every man is his equal.”(Locke) “The Social Contract” talked about have an equal relationship between government and the people....

Words: 979 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

John Locke Influence

...Haitian revolutions. John was a philosopher. (someone who thinks a lot about how people think). John Locke has influenced many other leaders too such as George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin. John got his power by being a philosopher. He got a very good education because of his dad having connections to the government. And that is what got him where he was at the time. The way that he used his power was maybe the most central idea in Locke's political way of thinking...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

John Locke

...John Locke's contributions in Philosophy and political views are followed and practiced even to this day. Locke’s ideas influenced religion, economics, political change, theories of knowledge and the human understanding that led to governmental and social improvements. John Locke believed in political reform. John Locke is one of the most influential authors and political philosophers in history. His ideas and views have influenced such momentous commodity such as the American constitution. Many of Locke’s ideas were used in the creation of the United States Constitution. John Locke was a British philosopher and medical researcher. Locke was born to Agnes Keene and John Locke on August 29, 1632, in Somerset, England. His father was a Puritan lawyer, who served as a Captain during the English civil war. Locke’s schooling began at Westminster School in 1647. He earned the title of King’s Scholar, which prepared him for the next phase of his education at the Christ Church in Oxford in 1652. He studied literature, physical science, medicine, politics, and natural philosophy. In 1656 he continued for his Master of Arts degree. In 1665 at Oxford, Locke encountered Lord Ashley, a notable statesman looking for medical treatment. After a friendship formed, Ashley invited Locke to join him in London as his personal physician. Locke agreed and left for London in 1667, where he lived for the next eight years. This was the beginning of Locke’s deep political interests, which was...

Words: 2488 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Hobbes V. Locke

...1    Hobbes v. Locke  Do you generally believe people are good? If you trust your fellow man so much, then  why do you lock your door? This is a form of the question, the great philosopher, Thomas  Hobbes would propose to people who believe that the general human state of nature is good.  Thomas Hobbes had a pessimistic view of human nature, similar to John Calvin. Hobbes  believed that the rapacious nature of man was for everyone to be at war with everyone. By  competing in each person’s own self interest, which led to life being poor, solitary, and brutish  until the formation of government. In the state of nature, this enables others to be able to come  and take that away from you. This is the intersection where Thomas Hobbes and another great  philosopher, John Locke, agree. They both believe that a source of social contract is necessary in  order to get along in the state of nature. Although Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both  developed the social contract theory, a closer examination of each fundamental philosophy  reveals a greater contrast in theory than most fail to realize such as the contrast in origins of  government, limitations of government, dwellings of sovereignty, and the rights of revolution.   The social contract theory was developed by multiple influential thinkers of political  philosophy. One of those men was Thomas Hobbes, who lived during the English Civil War.  During this war, he witnessed the collapse of absolute government and therefore influenced his  ...

Words: 1807 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Social Contract Theory of John Locke

...Social Contract Theory of John Locke Luca D. Iaria University of Phoenix CJA 532/ Ethics in Justice and Security Professor: Cyril Vierra January 25, 2015 John Locke was a British Philosopher born in 1632. His most famous written work was The second treatise of civil government (written in 1690). This book focused on the natural state of man and how government should be structured. Locke was a fan of man to say the least. Locke describes man in his writing’s as being inherently good natured. Locke goes on to explain that man in a state of nature is peaceful. Locke contested that man should challenge authority by using self reason to search for the truth. He said that man shouldn’t just expect the opinion of the authority or be subject to superstition. By man choosing to use reason he can then find the truth and challenge the legitimate functions of institutions hence optimizing human flourishing for the individual and the society. Locke explains that without the establishment of a common political authority, man will remain in a state of nature. This is a clear example of how Locke felt about man and how he viewed them as a whole. Lock stated “All men in their natural state are in a state of perfect freedom (Locke, 1690).” The positive side of Locke's anti-authoritarianism is that he believes that using reason to try to grasp the truth, and determining the legitimate functions of institutions will optimize human flourishing for the individual and society both in respect...

Words: 1278 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Economical Philosophy

...251 Professor Clarke Word Count: 1,597 The Ideals of Commerce of Aristotle vs. John Locke Aristotle and John Locke are two of the more prominent philosophers of their respective time periods when historically analyzing political philosophy. Each philosopher has many written sources of their beliefs and ideals, many of which go against the ‘norms’ of the societies of their time period. Second Treatise of Government, by John Locke, and Aristotle’s Politics, written by Aristotle, both outline each philosopher’s ideal political regime in which each political system described is tailored to each individual’s self-thinking. Past experiences as well as prior knowledge is used by both Aristotle and Locke to formulate their political regimes. When comparing the two previously mentioned books and analyzing the regimes proposed by both novels it is evident that both Aristotle and Locke differed in their respective evaluation of commercial or economic life. The biggest point of difference between the two had to do with humanity as Aristotle believed acquisition of necessities to be a natural process whereas Locke believed the onus was on human beings to go out and acquire which would naturally bring about commerce into existence. This essay will examine the reasons why they differed in this aspect of politics with further detail provided as well. When highlighting these reasons it will be very clear as to why their ideas of economic and commercial life did not parallel each other. Aristotle...

Words: 1651 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke Comparison

...Comparing Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s views concerning what life is like in a state of nature, we can see that the two-theorist’s share opposite views in making an assumption of what the state of nature is like. Thomas Hobbes’ views include pessimistic views of nature and how its effects can influence man to selfishly consider what he would need to do to secure his safety while John Locke presents a natural concept that assumes there is a universal thought of good that man is aware of. Attempting to justify the role of government or justice by understanding the state of nature can be somewhat accurate and can be considered for such purposes, but may fail to answer some aspects of society overall and leave other things unanswered. In regards...

Words: 3320 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Leg 500 Week 6 Discussion 1

...respond to the following: John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government were written to defend armed resistance to the English king by English subjects in the years preceding the Whig revolution, the Glorious Revolution of 1689 (as it’s called). Involved in plots, Locke fled from England to Holland in 1683 and stayed there until 1689. The First Treatise is an attack on the theory of absolute monarchy defended by Sir Robert Filmer. The Filmer theory traces the rights of the monarch to the establishment of monarchical power in Adam (the first man of the Bible) by God. This absolute authority to rule then gets passed along down to the present king of England. So the king is answerable only to God and the subjects are obligated to obey the king’s commands come what may, says Filmer. * Explain what, according to Locke, gives a person their right to property. As stated in the textbook, " everyman has a property in his own Person. This nobody has any right to but himself. The labor of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labor with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state nature placed it in, it hath by this labor something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men" (p.209, Halbert and Ingulli, 2009). Labor, for Locke, includes picking up acorns...

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Karl Marx And John Locke Similarities

...this essay will focus primarily on the workings of John Locke and Karl Marx. Both being raised in a different time, thus different upbringings have resulted in a difference in their train of thought and philosophical approaches on life. Karl Marx has been forced...

Words: 1999 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Age Of Reason Dbq

...aspects. It was also known as the Age of Reason and took place primarily in England during the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Philosophers such as John Locke, Voltaire, Adam Smith and Mary Wollstonecraft all believed that society would be best through freedom in government, religion, economy and gender roles. In order to have a good and working government, John Locke believed that freedom was the most important element. According to him, “There is nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank...should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection…” (Source A) This shows how he believes that a government without people who are superior and ruling (kings and queens) is the most successful type. John locke knew that individual freedom is the best for a good democracy that works for everyone....

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

John Locke Vs Rousseau

...Vice or Virtue John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are two highly influential philosophers who individually wrote pieces on what they believe would be the correct form of governing, both advocated the only way to govern people is to do so with their willing consent. Despite their agreement on that, their foundations to reach this ultimate goal is starkly different, they view the people who are giving this consent with different lens. Locke considered the assurance of one’s private property a positive and prosperous for man, and motivated the ability to attain more than what is needed as long as it is not taken by force or gone to waste. Rousseau blatantly viewed it as an evil phenomenon that would begin the domino effect for the decline in...

Words: 1792 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Ap World History Flvs Thematic Essay

...causes and controlling its effects. To remove the causes of factions is by destroying the liberty and giving to every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interest. 3.Why won't the two methods listed in question two not work? The two methods won't work because you would have to destroy the citizens' rights which would destroy the government. 4.According to Hamilton, What was the most common cause of factions? The most common cause of faction would be the...

Words: 1646 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Absolutism and Constitutionalism

...Constitutionalism? The word merit is relative, however in this case, it relates to how the people can benefit from either form of government. According to John Locke, Constitutionalism is “…to be directed to no other end but the peace, safety, and public good of the people” (82). Generally speaking, Constitutionalism has a more positive connotation than Absolutism because people associate constitutionalism with the idea of free will. However, there can never be total free will in a collective effort. Locke actually does not approve of the idea of total free will, “…the enjoyment of it is very uncertain…very unsafe, very insecure” (80). Locke addresses the states of Nature and why they are and can be destructive. “…passion and revenge is very apt to carry them too far…negligence and unconcernedness, makes them too remiss in other men’s…They who by an injustice offended will seldom fail where they are able by force to make good their injustice” (80-81). In addition, Locke does not view men coalescing to make a constitutionalist government as giving up one’s rights, but rather the opposite, proclaiming that it indirectly preserves them instead, “…give up equality, liberty, and executive power they had in the state of Nature…the power of the…legislative constituted by them can never be supposed to extend farther than the common good…obliged to secure every one’s property by providing against…mentioned that made the state of Nature so unsafe and uneasy” (82). On the other hand, Absolutism...

Words: 607 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

General Education Curriculum

...Taking this philosophy class, or any philosophy class teaches students how to manage their time wisely. This class is online, and because it is online we do not see our instructor and have a designated time for classes. Students who take this class must become diligent in doing their work and putting forth the effort to receive good grades. I believe that the lessons this classes cause students to be able to relate to the philosophers that we have learned about in this course. Philosophers must be diligent, and patient in what they are writing about. These ideas that they have developed do not just develop overnight. They have put a tremendous amount of time into what they believe and say. That is how students taking this course must be. They must learn to be diligent and be patient when doing the work that is involved. Learning how to be patient and diligent is lessons that everyone must learn to be able to fulfill the purpose that God has given us. Everything learned about in a philosophy class ties in with everyday life. Having a philosophy class on the general education...

Words: 1403 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

When, If Ever, Is It Legitimate for Politicians to Lie

...expenses scandal provides an example as to why national and global societies have suspicious feelings toward the intentions of politicians. This essay will highlight the fact that the role of a professional politician, where instant decisive and important decisions need to be made, and the context sometimes require democratically elected politicians, engaged in a social contract with the electorate, to lie to safeguard the greater good of national and global citizens. Due to the volume of theory and discourse related to this topic, it would not be practical to analyse all aspects to this question. However, this essay will examine the following: first, it will look at the unique nature of the role of a politician, followed by an overview of the social contract theory and the contributions made to it by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Rawls. Then, the work of Niccolo Machiavelli and the notion of Reason of State will be examined, followed, in turn, by Utilitarianism, commenting on the contributions of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. This will be done before going onto balance the essay by introducing a counterargument offered by Idealism. Finally, to contextualise the thesis, there will be a contemporary example given of a world leader having to lie for the greater good of global citizens for possible prevention of future harm. Politicians work in a difficult profession and what they do is for the common good of society as a whole. Bellamy (2010) asserts...

Words: 2124 - Pages: 9