...With unreliable views and values, our culture needs to have unrestricted freedom to speak in relation to whichever and all that alarms us in array to constantly develop our culture. Individual free speech inconsistency would be words that create a constructive, and not pessimistic, picture in mutually long-terms and short-terms. Dictionary.com classifies Freedom of Speech as, “the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.” Freedom of speech is also known as free speech or freedom of expression. Freedom of speech is also known as freedom of expression because a person’s beliefs and thoughts can also be expressed in other ways other than speech. These ways could be art, writings, songs, and other forms of expression. If speaking freely and expressing ourselves freely is supposed to be without any consequence, then why are there constant law suits and consequences for people who do. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression should be exactly what they mean. Although most people believe that they can speak about anything without there being consequences, this is very untrue. One of those spoken things that have consequences is speaking about the president in such a negative way that it sends red flags about your intentions. Because of the high terrorist alerts, people have to limit what they say about bombs, 9/11, and anything they may say out of anger about...
Words: 1993 - Pages: 8
...Allegiance. We pledge towards the symbol of America because of the freedom it has granted us and for all the people who fight for our country’s freedom. However, lately there has been a controversy over many elements of the pledge- should we continue to say it in schools? What about sporting events? Should “under God” be removed or should it stay? The Pledge of Allegiance should not be required to say at schools and sporting events because it violates the basic human rights like freedom of speech and freedom of religion....
Words: 1886 - Pages: 8
...Freedom of Religion, Speech and the Press The first amendment is part of the United States Constitution in a short portion called the United States Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is one of the high laws of our land. “It guarantees that the United States government can never deprive people in the United States of certain fundamental rights,” according to aclu.org. The first amendment states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” according to nccs.net. This means that us as Americans have the right to...
Words: 1089 - Pages: 5
...What is freedom? Freedom is the ability to act, think or speak freely without limitation. The United States of America is notorious for being founded on the basis of freedom and democracy. Freedom is an amazing thing to have but there are times where it is used excessively causing harm around us. It is wonderful to be able to express opinions but there should be a limit as to what we should say to others or in public. John Stuart Mill argues that the government must never censor its citizens, no matter their opinion and that is agreeable to certain extent. The Bill of Rights is one of the nations essential founding documents added to the constitution in 1791. The Bill of Rights are the first 10 amendments to the constitution that limit the power of the United Stated federal government and itemizes fundamental rights and liberties provided to the people. The Founding fathers wanted to create a strong national government in which its citizens were able to have a voice in what goes on in the government. Though the constitution had already certain rights protected for the citizens many argued that those amendments weren’t enough for many citizens. Thomas Jefferson, one of the founding fathers was pressuring the government to pass the bill of rights. “ A bill of rights he insisted is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular and what no just government should refuse” (Bessette and Pitney p.57). In other words, Jefferson wanted the...
Words: 1344 - Pages: 6
...Free speech should be allowed on campus. Free speech is meant to be free and should not be limited to certain areas. Our first amendment rights tell us that we have free speech, along with some other freedoms, and that should mean free not limited to certain areas. The people on campus should have the right to say what they want and not fear getting in trouble for it. These people should have the same rights as if they were not on campus, but that does not seem like how it is. The schools are there to help the students and to teach them better and newer things in life. Colleges are not there to restrict your rights, they are there to help you learn and to help you get a career after you graduate. They do have free speech on most campuses, but they have designated it to certain zones. These zones are a good idea, but it is our first amendment right to have the freedom of speech and they are slowly taking that away from us on campus. The administrative forces have been trying to punish these people that are not following by their rules. These colleges are trying to limit the free speech of students in their schools. These people try to take a stand with peaceful protests, but they just end up getting...
Words: 1017 - Pages: 5
...sometimes, but … how was that a crime? In the United States we have a Bill of Rights guaranteeing us freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Don’t we?’ This is what the American novelist Joyce Carol Oates writes the very end of her novel taking her point of departure in Matt Donaghy who goes to Rocky River High School. The above quote from the novel includes a discourse on the issues of being a big mouth and most importantly the freedom of speech which according to the protagonist Matt Donaghy does not exist? In the story we are inside Matt’s head and therefore we follow and see all of his thoughts on the situation going on and his way of behaving towards the people questioning him in the office about what he actually said. Bear in mind that even though he firmly denies the accusations, he is almost continuously being mistrusted. This is probably caused by his very sarcastic behavior because he keeps saying inappropriate things even when he’s interrogated in the office: ‘I can tell you: I never threatened anybody or anything…And if I had, I wouldn’t tell you, about it, would I?’ Matt is maybe not aware of the possibility that he did actually say something to his friends that could be misinterpreted and have a deleterious effect. He starts realizing that the sarcastic jokes won’t help him out and can only hurt him even more – only by choosing the right arguments with care can he avoid the mistrust laid upon him. His speech is therefore restricted which is perhaps intentionally...
Words: 1134 - Pages: 5
...abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” If you look at that, you may say that’s an easy read. The Amendment states freedom of religion, speech, press, petition and assembly. But interpretation of this is far from easy, and as can be seen court case after court case have tried to determine the limits of these freedoms. How can these words not be understood? In this essay I will be arguing why cursing in public...
Words: 1320 - Pages: 6
...Although the U.S. says we have the freedom of speech, there are limits being put on the things we say. The Constitution clearly states that U.S. citizens have free speech, but do we really? People nationwide are being threatened and losing their jobs every day for the things they say or write. Television shows and cartoon drawings are being censored because of others not agreeing with their opinions. Limits should not be put on our right of free speech because, if we didn’t have freedom of speech, this would not be a free country. Freedom of speech comes from Freedom of Expression, which states that U.S. citizens have the right of free speech and more. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states that all citizens have the right of free speech. The legal definition of Freedom of Speech is “The right guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S., to express beliefs and ideas without unwarranted government attention”. Freedom of speech includes the right to not salute the flag, to wear black armbands to school in protest of war, to use certain offensive words to convey political messages, to contribute money to political campaigns, to advertise commercial products, and to engage in symbolic speech. If we have the right of free speech, we should be able to speak our mind without...
Words: 631 - Pages: 3
...government for a specific project. Block Grants are federal grants that allow the state and local government to disperse funds to a specific department or division. 3. Of the Supreme Court cases mentioned in chapter three, which TWO do you think had the most impact on the federal system of government? Why? The Dred Scott decision (1857) made a huge impact on the federal government and paved the way to the abolishment of slavery in the Union. The decision created hysteria in the North and spilt the most powerful political party the Democrats in half. Democrats nominated two different candidates to become president which was spilt in half and made way for a Republican president Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln called for a gradual abolishment of slavery which in turn led Southern states to leave the Union and Civil War began to preserve the Union and end slavery. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) this led to the “separate but equal law” Mr. Plessy was accused of violating a Louisiana Law that stated blacks and white couldn’t ride on the same railroad car. In the Plessy decision the court allowed southern states segregation of races, so white children went to different schools from black children, blacks used different water fountains, different movie theaters. This went on for many years until the Civil rights; Brown vs. Board of Education...
Words: 705 - Pages: 3
...things you probably shouldn’t have. Now, fast forward to Monday morning at school. You get pulled up to the principal's office and you both get in trouble for a fight between only the two of you and no one else. Not fair right? Students are badly punished for posting small comments about another person on social media when they aren’t even in school. And it is not fair for people to get in trouble for posting videos of fights because they are technically helping the administrators catch the students who actually where in the fight. Bullying leads to suicidal thoughts or actions to a person. The first reason that students should not be punished for what they do online is because they have the resources to post what they please, although it may not be the kindest or most appropriate. Teachers should not be given the right to look through student...
Words: 551 - Pages: 3
...Constitution protects our basic rights are that it gives us freedom of speech, expression, and religion. We also always have the right to due process. These are a few ways the Constitution protects our basic rights. Why did the Founders think freedom of religion was so important? 1a. The Founders thought freedom of religion was important because they didn’t want to violate people’s individual rights. They also did not want conflict among the colonists because of the differences in their beliefs. One major reason the colonists...
Words: 1050 - Pages: 5
...Many individuals have expressed concerns about the usage of American Indian mascots and insignia in American schools. There is debate about whether or not utilizing American Indian mascots and emblems is protected under the First Amendment. Several representations may be used as mascots and logos without disrespecting Indigenous people's culture. While the argument that banning American Indian mascots violates free speech is one viewpoint, it is important to note that these mascots and logos spread false information about American Indian culture, harm young American Indian people's sense of social belonging and self-esteem, and destroy the tendency to convey correct...
Words: 1056 - Pages: 5
...College campuses should not be a place where young adults are targeted by special interest groups, taught one-side of an issue, or dominated by expression that can intimidate the free flow of ideas. College campuses are filled with diversity. Rather, students from all over the world, whether citizens or guests, should feel welcome to share cultural, political, and traditional values openly. Unfortunately, some people take our freedoms to extremes on both sides of the issue and without limitations to free speech it could be abused. The essence of why free speech should be limited or censored on college campuses is best captured in Lawrence’s own writing On Racist Speech. “Assaultive rasict speech functions as a preemptive strike. The invective is experienced as a blow, not as a proffered idea, and once the blow is struck, it is unlikely that a dialogue will follow. Racial insults are particularly undeserving of First Amendment protection because the perpetrator’s intention is not to discover truth or initiate dialogue but to injure the victim.”(page56 paragraph 6.) The law of the land states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” (United States Constitution. First Amendment.) Prior to ratifying the U.S. Constitution...
Words: 683 - Pages: 3
...process clause? The incorporation process is a legal act of creating a corporation. The only amendment in the Bill of Rights NOT covered by the 14th amendment's Due Process clause is the 2nd amendment. Most rights and limitations relating to guns are covered by state law. You will find very few laws limiting the sales and ownership of firearms 6. How do you think the United States might be different today if the Supreme Court had not applied the process of incorporation to the due process clause? Due process is the principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law. If that did not exist, we would not have rights, such as illegal search and seizure. Section 2: 2. Why does aid to parochial schools often pose a constitutional problem? As parochial schools are religious in nature, aid to them can be considered support of a religion, which is generally unconstitutional. 4. Explain the free exercise clause. Give one example of a Supreme Court ruling that limits free exercise of religion. The free exercise clause guarantees to each person the right to believe whatever he or...
Words: 882 - Pages: 4
...UNDERSTAND: The Radio Address was a historical speech that sought after peace from the impending war. This is a primary source because it’s a firsthand account of the event. Throughout the reading of this speech, I found some keywords that I believed were important and defining them helped me understand the speech more. Belligerent, was a word Charles used to describe our nation which means hostile and aggressive. He also used propaganda frequently throughout the speech which means information in a biased and misleading nature. He also briefly discussed the Monroe Doctrine which is a US policy created by James Monroe in 1823 that states “any intervention by external powers in the politics of the Americas is a potentially hostile...
Words: 1005 - Pages: 5
