DRAFT Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft draft draft. Draft, draft. Draft draft draft darft
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
As indicated by USA Today, "Congress is thinking about a bill that would bar kids who utilize PCs in broad daylight libraries from getting to Facebook and other long range interpersonal communication sites without parental consent." The law is a measure to shield youngsters from sexual stalkers. Others are contending this meddles with "library clients' protection and free discourse". I need to concur with those that contend this meddles with protection and free discourse. While youngsters ought
Words: 733 - Pages: 3
hateful or disturbing. Finally, plain text on the internet lacks an essential part of communication, voice inflection. Internet monitoring is an invasion of privacy and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures (in this case, the Fourth Amendment would apply to unreasonable searches). When people post something on the internet, they expect that information to be read by the intended recipient or recipients, not by the government. Even if
Words: 783 - Pages: 4
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment's intended meaning. For example, some people believe that the Amendment's phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" creates an individual constitutional right for citizens of the United States. Under this "individual
Words: 1465 - Pages: 6
The ones who argue that guns are the problem want to either rule out guns completely or have more regulations. The citizens who are against gun control will contradict that argument by saying that guns are a right; that it is part of the second amendment. They will also state that guns are for protection. The question then becomes what one is the right one? I believe that guns are not the problem, but that the people themselves are the issue. In agreement with the statement made from Shiah Dalmia
Words: 990 - Pages: 4
Freedom of speech is a civil liberty protected by the first amendment. Most people also refer to this liberty as freedom of expression, which was adopted on December 15, 1791 making part of the Bill of Rights. It allows you to express your opinion without any government restraints. Additionally, this liberty not only protects your expression verbally, but it protects all type of communication. However, the modern democracies also have limits on this freedom. Not all speech is protected by this liberty
Words: 765 - Pages: 4
Giovanni Zanoletti Il consolidamento democratico in America Latina: storia e prospettive. Il processo di formazione di regimi indipendenti e democratici in America Latina, iniziato con le lotte per l’affrancamento dalla dominazione coloniale verso la fine degli anni ’10 del XIX sec., è sempre stato caratterizzato da alcuni elementi culturali e sociali che si sono mantenuti costanti durante questi due secoli di storia, in parte comuni alle varie entità statali di cui il sub-continente si compone
Words: 6110 - Pages: 25
Rape Shield Laws Name of Student Institutional Affiliation Rape Shield Laws Definition A rape shield law is a law that denies a defendant the ability to a cross-examine rape complainant or evidence about their conduct in sexual behavior in the past (Portlock, 2007). It may also be used to refer to a law that prohibits media sources from publishing the identity of an individual who is accused of rape. This law was established so
Words: 1035 - Pages: 5
Habermas auf fünf Seiten von Egbert Scheunemann 2 1 Aktualisierte Version August 2008 Habermas‘ inzwischen in über dreißig Bänden entfaltetes philosophisches und gesellschaftstheoretisches Denken auf wenigen Seiten zusammenzufassen, ist kein leichtes Unterfangen. Gleichwohl möchte ich im Folgenden kurz zusammenfassen, worum es bei Habermas grundsätzlich geht und wie ‚alles‘ grundsätzlich zusammenhängt, weil mir ein ähnlicher Versuch, Habermas’ Gesamtwerk für die schnelle Lektüre auf wenige
Words: 2754 - Pages: 12
"Many people’s first reaction to being asked about the U.S. government’s role in monitoring internet content is the very reasonable conclusion that they certainly have a duty to do so for those who are on a list of some sort from either committing a crime or having ties to an organization that has a history with committing crime. Everyone can surely come to agreement that they should not track every U.S. citizen because it is an extreme waste of resources and tax dollars and a violation of due
Words: 795 - Pages: 4
