Free Essay

Mexico Revolution

In:

Submitted By tonipii
Words 1554
Pages 7
History of Mexican Revolution

Anthony Zermeno

LALS 262/HIST 262: Latin America Since 1850

April 16, 2016

HISTORY OF MEXICAN REVOLUTION

The Mexican Revolution which started in 1910 and ended in 1920, is recognized as the first major political, social, and cultural revolution on the 20th century. It was a war that started when liberals, which are people that believe that the governments action is to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all, and intellectuals began to challenge the regime of dictator Porfirio Diaz, who had been in power from 1876 to 1911, which is a term of 34 years called El Porfiriato, violating the principles and ideals of the Mexican Constitution of 1857. The constitution established individual rights such as freedom of speech; freedom of conscience; freedom of the press; freedom of assembly; and the right to bear arms. It also reaffirmed the abolition of slavery, eliminated debtor prison, and eliminated all forms of cruel and unusual punishment, including the death penalty. As a result of El Porfiriato there is economic crises, anti re-election campaigns, inter-elite alliances crumbled, mobilization of subaltern sectors (peasants, workers, small landholders, etc.). Since so much corruption was taking place a revolution emerged. It was a revolution that was led by different factions, representatives of the poor peasant sector (Emiliano Zapata), poor northern ranchers (Pancho Villa), marginalized provincial middle class people (Alvaro Obregon) and the propertied provincial ranchers (Venustiano Carranza). All these factions formed an unstable unity to overthrow the dictatorial regime, then collaborated in writing Mexico’s modern constitution. The conflict lasted for about a decade and had several distinct phases. The period from 1920-1940 is often considered to be the Revolution phase, during which power was consolidated and the revolutionary constitution of 1917 was implemented. Over time the war became a multisided civil war in which particular regions with frequently shifting power struggled among factions in the Mexican Revolution. After the war and the establishment of the Mexican constitution of 1917 is the first document in the world to establish social rights. Although social rights was one of the main establishments of the Constitution, it also made profound changes in Mexican political philosophy that helped frame the political and social backdrop for Mexico in the twentieth century. Under the 1917 Constitution Carranza’s was elected president but he continued to ignore its promises. As a consequence, the revolution continued and Carranza was assassinated. General Alvaro Obregon then rose into power. The Mexican Revolution gave birth to a variety of the new artistic currents in literature, the visual arts and music. The revolution not only affected culture in a positive way and established a new constitution but also formatted the post revolutionary state, which was when state-builders just as Díaz had been: but unlike Díaz they were forced to build a state apparatus which incorporated the ‘masses’ - indeed, the Revolution laid the basis for creating a ‘mass society’ in place of the more socially fragmented, regionalized kind of system which existed before.
From what I have read, the readings only talk about the people who are trying to over thrown the current government and their reasons for trying to do so. Through out the readings I have been asking my self one question, what was the nature of the group that was being seized power? The readings do little to no explaining about who the power was being taken from but rather describe more about who was taking the power and how they were doing so.
The Mexican Revolution has raised many fascinating questions. Many of which have been answered from what I have read. But there are two questions that are is still being unanswered, why didn’t the campesinos take power? When discussing about the power distribution in the readings it explains how the campesinos did rebel but there is nothing that describes the campesinos power and where it was located. Another important question, that is not discussed by many historians is, leaving aside the content of the Mexican Revolution, is there any sense in which the historical memory of revolution itself prepared the politics for what came after? Yes, there has been some explaining as to what came after the revolution but not much is said as to how the revolution affects the governing now and how it affected the governing in the past. When it comes to my fist question I asked, why didn’t the campesinos take power? I don’t understand why campesinos where neglected power if much of there land was taken from them. The government believed that it was becoming increasingly clear that for Mexico to progress and carry out these important reforms, the rooted privileges of the past had to be broken, including among the landlord class. Carranza’s general Álvaro Obregón would fall into this category, as would many others. These activists were not explicitly ant-capitalist, but were certainly disgusted with the capitalists that Mexico had. They did not believe that either campesinos or workers should rule, but they did believe that campesinos and workers should be granted significant reforms. These major reformers have been described by historians and their contemporaries as Jacobins, a reference to the radical middle-class camp in the French Revolution.
For Obregón the goal was also to break the enemy: the old Porfirian landlords and their allies. To do this required mobilizing the support of workers and campesinos by granting them significant concessions. Obregón wanted to build a strong, centralized national government that could bring an end to the revolutionary upheaval, grant social reforms to the masses across the country and reestablish Mexican capitalism on a better basis. All this meant crushing the resistance of the remaining reactionary elements of Porfirian society, who had continued to exert their influence under both Madero and Huerta. For Obregón and his radical Jacobin allies, the forces of Villa and Zapata would not be able to accomplish these combined tasks.
In regards to my second question, that if there any sense in which the historical memory of revolution prepared the politics for what came after? According to an argument that has some influence, when a country experiences a major revolution like the one Mexico experienced, it somewhat influences people against having another for a long time, because they remember just how bad it can be. Indeed, recent research has confirmed that the Mexican Revolution was extremely bloody and costly much more so than, the revolutions in Cuba or Bolivia in the 1950s. So, while Mexicans certainly remember the benefits, including greater authorization, better education, and land reform, those who survived the experience tend to make a revolution a last resort and not a go to solution.
Historically, I would say, most people don’t want to have to get involved in revolutions. It usually takes a lot of frustration for revolutionary situations to happen. Normally you need a pretty offensive government or rule or set of social affairs to provoke a revolution in the first place. I think that for many years after the decade of revolutionary violence, there was a kind a bias—toward trying to settle disputes in ways that did not involve serious violent disorders. The record of Mexico, compared to, Argentina or Peru in the post-war period probably had something to do with that memory of the revolution’s costs and a dislike to any repetition.
With this being said, people will still protest and rally, of course since its something we experience to this day and age, and Mexico has a rich history of protest and rallies over the 20th century. But it’s not surprising that there has been no other major revolution since 1910. Then again, major revolutions are quite rare events in history, wherever you look.

Bibliography
Primary Sources: * Womack, John, Jr. "The Mexican Revolution 1910-1920." The Mexican Revolution 1910-1920. World Battles and Revolution, n.d. Web. 02 Mar. 2016. * Wasserman, Mark. The Mexican Revolution: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2012. Print.
Secondary Sources: * The Mexican Revolution." The Mexican Revolution. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Mar. 2016. * Knight,"Mexican Revolution: Interpretations" pp. 869–873. * Swanson, Philip. The Companion to Latin American Studies. London: Arnold, 2003. Print. * Alan Knight, "Mexican Revolution: Interpretations" in Encyclopedia of Mexico, vol. 2, p. 873. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn 1997. * Friedrich Katz, The Secret War in Mexico: Europe, the United States, and the Mexican Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1981, p. 35. * Katz, The Secret War in Mexico p. 35. * Wikipedia. "Mexican Revolution." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 02 Mar. 2016. * Easterling, Stuart. "Mexico's Revolution 1910–1920: Part 3." Issue #100. ISR, Mar. 2011. Web. 27 Apr. 2016. *

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Swanson, Philip. The Companion to Latin American Studies. London: Arnold, 2003. Print.
[ 2 ]. Knight,"Mexican Revolution: Interpretations" pp. 869–873.
[ 3 ]. "The Mexican Revolution." The Mexican Revolution. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Mar. 2016.
[ 4 ]. Hart, John M. Revolutionary Mexico: The Coming and Process of the Mexican Revolution. Berkeley: U of California, 1987. Print
[ 5 ]. Easterling, Stuart. "Mexico's Revolution 1910–1920: Part 3." Issue #100. ISR, Mar. 2011. Web. 27 Apr. 2016.
[ 6 ]. Gonzales, Michael J. The Mexican Revolution, 1910-1940. Albuquerque: U of New Mexico, 2002. Print.
[ 7 ]. Rosen, Fred. "Mexico's Unspent Revolutionary Legacies: An Interview With Historian Alan Knight." NACLA. NACLA, Jan. `2014. Web. 27 Apr. 2016.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Mexico Murals

...chose these two murals because I saw them as somewhat of a before and after the Mexican Revolution ended. The first mural shows the dark times for Mexico and the somewhat bright times for the United States. The second mural shows what looks more of a happier time for the nation. The essential question that I chose to go with my two murals was the first one which said ‘Was the Mexican Revolution a true revolution that brought social, economic, and political change to Mexico?’ In the mural ‘The Epic of American Civilization’ there are many things going on. On one side of...

Words: 802 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

History of Spanish Language Newspapers

...Eron Jenkins History of News Media Jeff Johnson November 28, 2011 Spanish-Language Newspapers in Ybor City and New Mexico In 1898, the Cuban War for Independence ended. 12 years later, the Mexican Revolution against the autocratic president Porfirio Díaz began. Not surprisingly, the ramifications of these two events were not limited to Cuba and Mexico. Thousands of Spanish speaking people came to the United States in search work and asylum. In Tampa, Florida, in a neighborhood called Ybor City, cigar manufacturers offered work to immigrants from Cuba and Spain. Conversely, in New Mexico, Spanish speaking people had lived in the region north of the Rio Grande for hundreds of years. However, growth and stability in the region offered new opportunities to Americans from the east and Mexican immigrants from the south. The goal of this paper will be to examine the development and content of Spanish language newspapers in these two areas from 1900-1910 by looking at two newspapers: El Diario de Tampa of Ybor City and La Estrella of La Cruces, New Mexico.               To understand any aspect of any culture one must note the historical context in which the event occurs. In this case, the goal is to study the history of the news media, specifically newspapers, in Ybor City and New Mexico. Because of the corresponding migration and revolutionary atmosphere, the context of the development of the newspapers in these two places is similar. However, they diverge in terms of their...

Words: 3298 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

U.S. Intervenes in Foreign Affairs

...isolationist or interventionist manner. Throughout its history, from the Mexican-American War and Mexican Revolution, the U.S. in Nicaragua, and World War I, that the United States has undeniably and continuously acted as an interventionist in world affairs. The United State’s economic interests, as well as its mission to spread democracy, were leading causes for intervention. There is a fine line between encouraging change in countries and interfering in their international affairs; however, the U.S. has repeatedly crossed it. The Mexican-American War was a major military intervention for the US. The United States began to infringe upon Mexico’s sovereignty in the 1840s when the American mission of manifest destiny advances the United States’ economic interests of Westward expansion throughout Mexican territory (Lecture Sept. 24). In this case, the American public, which was influenced by the Polk administration, justified and disguised means for war and territorial and economic expansion as being “pioneers of civilization,” (Herring 201) and spreading the blessing of democracy; American public support for the war was strong. Moreover, Mexican land was the driving factor of the war because Polk considered Western territory to the Pacific Coast to be valuable as it would be pivotal to increase American power, as well as important to conquer before European powers could ally with Mexico, hindering US expansion. He therefore convinced Congress that this was enough of a threat to declare...

Words: 1467 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Diplomacy, Wilson and Roosevelt

...Historians used ‘progressive diplomacy’ as an expression to explain the presidential regards of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Both Roosevelt and Wilson, during their presidency, dealt with extreme reforms in foreign policy to change the old world order. Progressive Diplomacy, describes the trading expansion in the United States, during 1901 through 1920, which both Roosevelt and Wilson funded by accelerating the military forces in the United States. In their precedencies, Roosevelt and Wilson used the ideology of progressivism to shape their approach in changing the United States’ foreign policies through expanding the military and giving a new world order by using the value of moralism. Theodore Roosevelt used his ‘Big Stick’ approach to impact other nations in order to solve disputes with the Caribbean. Using a progressive ideology he believed in order to conserve and grow the United States’ economic and political stature, the military needed to be strengthened. He described his activism as a silent but an aggressive movement. Roosevelt’s pursued plans to enlarge foreign policy, was to build a canal across the Isthmus of Panama, to connect the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean, which would expand the United States trade. He first tried to compromise a leasing consensus with Columbia, which in turn was rejected by Columbia’s senate, in the fall of 1903. Coming up with a new strategy, Roosevelt plotted against Colombia. He told Philippe Bunau-Varilla, an engineer agent...

Words: 778 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Revolution in Texas

...“Revolution in Texas” Texas has had a long history of conflict, revolution, animosity, and racial skirmishes. Once occupied by a vast majority of Mexicans, Texas was first claimed by the Spanish, and later declared its own independence in 1836, seceding from Mexico to become the Republic of Texas. This newfound independence was short-lived however, in 1845, the United States government decided to annex Texas in order to create a new state for the growing country. Although at the time Texas’s population was still dominated by Mexicans, slowly whites began to migrate to Texas to take advantage of fertile, cheap land, perfect for ranching and agriculture. This growing number of whites brought many problems among the native Mexican people; these will later be explored in this essay. Mexico did not take well to Texas’s secession and the United State’s recent annexation; consequently they saw the state as a rebel territory. From 1846 to 1848, the Mexican/American war was fought; ultimately, the United States won, but it did not put a stop to the localized conflicts and battles still being fought between Mexicans and the immigrating whites. Ben Johnson, author of Revolution in Texas, explores the revolution following the conclusion of the Mexican/American war. Johnson speaks of a different revolution, separate from the original war, a revolution that was fueled by racial, land, cultural, and border disputes. When the railroad finally reached Texas in 1904, this sparked a massive...

Words: 1271 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Mexican Americaan War

...role of shaping it to the most successful economic country today. The Mexican- American War was interesting to me because of all the moving pieces. In Mexico you had the Federalist going against the Consecutives. The whole time this was going on you had the Abolitionist opposing the war, thinking that America wanted Mexico just to add more slave states. At this time the term “MANIFEST DESTINY” was coined . In August 1843 Santa Anna threaten war with America if they were to incorporate Texas into the Union. Herrera (new president of Mexico) didn’t take this stance. With the encouragement from Great Britain President Herrera decided to resolve the issue of Texas with diplomacy rather than war. President Herrera then told America to send an ambassador to negotiate the Settlement of the Texas boundary. America sent Ambassador Slidell to negotiate for Texas, but his intensions involved more than just the State of Texas. When Ambassador Slidell went into Mexico he had every intention to buy California and New Mexico from Mexico. United States made an offer of 25 million dollars for The Rio Grande border in Texas and another 25 to 30 million for Mexico’s provinces of Alta California (California) and Santa Fe De Nuevo Mexico (New Mexico). Mexico was not inclined nor in position to negotiate. The Mexican people thought by selling the territories to the United States that it would tarnish there national...

Words: 2102 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Art Appreciation 2 - Research an Artist - Diego Rivera

...ART 110 – Art Appreciation Assignment #2 – Research an Artist The Early Life of the Artist 1. When was the artist born? Diego Rivera was born on December 8, 1886. (Wiki) 2. Where was the artist born? Rivera was born into a well off family in Guanajuato City, Guanajuato, Mexico. (Wiki) 3. Note any information you were able to find on the parents of the artist. Rivera’s maternal linage stemmed from Jews who had converted to Roman Catholicism. His father’s side came from Spanish nobility. (Wiki) 4. Did the artist have any brothers or sisters? Rivera was born with a twin brother, Jose Carlos, who died before he was two years old. He also had a sister, Maria del Pilar Rivera, who was 4-5 years younger than he was. (diegorivera.com) 5. What were some of the significant childhood experiences in the early life of the artist? Rivera enrolled in his first art classes at ten years old. By thirteen, his father forces him into military college, but after only two short weeks he is allowed to enroll in regular classes in San Carlos. (diegorivera.com) 6. Note any information on the education of the artist. At the age of twenty, Rivera received a four year scholarship for European study and begins training under Spanish realist Eduardo Chicharro. (diegorivera.com) 7. What was the artist’s early career like? Was it as an artist or was it in another field? By age eighteen, Diego was painting both figures and landscapes, similar to...

Words: 1656 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Giant Wealth Gap In Mexico

...Mexico is the 14th richest country in the world, yet more than half of its population is struggling to survive. While an estimated 53 million Mexicans living in poverty a mere one percent has 43 percent of the country's wealth at their fingertips. This however is not a new issue; Mexico has been struggling with it’s giant wealth gap for some time which can date back to the Mexican revolution starting in 1910. So why does mexico have the same problem it did 100 years ago? Mexico can partly blame it’s giant wealth gap on two easily repairable ideas, a low minimum wage, and education access. First of all, one of the main reasons Mexico has such an extreme wealth gap is because of the minimum wage. The current minimum wage is equal to $3.90 U.S. dollars a day according to, Schiaffino and Santo. Mexicans...

Words: 796 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Bruno Traven

...Diego Bustos Mrs. Schmitt English 120 21 May 2012 Traven’s Literature: Subliminal or Straight Criticism? In 1993, Bruno Traven’s Canasta de Cuentos Mexicanos was published. Although numerous people have read his work, many critics claim that Traven’s literature is nothing more than subliminal criticism. In an online “working paper,” writer Mr. Tapio Helen from the University of Helsinki, Finland, states that Traven’s ideology “is socialism and anarchism” (par 5) and Helen writes: “capitalism and bureaucracy make decent life impossible for the ordinary man.” Since Traven’s work of literature is full of subliminal criticism about capitalism functioning over subordinate countries, Traven has been the target of critics since his literature was first published in the 1930s. Despite the controversial criticism surrounding his work, Traven accurately describes the American capitalistic system, its flaws and the impact it has over subordinated countries. Traven is more mysterious and difficult to find credible information about than the majority of authors. This is because there does not exist precise data, only theories about Traven’s origin. One of the reasons of this incognita is that during his life Bruno Traven had different names in order to keep his true identity hidden. Ret Marut, Traven Torsvan, and Hal Croves are the three names most associated with Bruno Traven. His wife, Mrs. Rosa Elena Lujan, said that Bruno Traven was an actor in Germany by the...

Words: 2686 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Mexican American War

...of more than 500,000 square miles (1,300,000 square km) of Mexican territory extending westward from the Rio Grande to the Pacific Ocean . Mexico severed relations with the United States in March 1845, shortly after the U.S. annexation of Texas, partly because of Mexican opposition to the annexation and partly because of the conviction in the North that Texas represented an expansion of slavery. Furthermore, the boundary was in dispute. Mexico claimed that the southern boundary of Texas was the Nueces River, the Texan boundary while under Mexican rule. Americans, as well as the incoming President, claimed that the boundary of Texas was the Rio Grande River. The territory between the two rivers was the subject of angry bickering between the two nations and therefore served as the catalyst for an all-out war. President Polk's true goal was to acquire the rich ports of California. When his offer to purchase the lands were rejected by Mexican President José Joaquín Herrera, who was aware in advance of the American’s intention of dismembering his country, President Polk ordered Troops under General Zachary Taylor to occupy the disputed area between the Nueces and the Rio Grande. The Mexicans retaliated by attacking U.S troops in the disputed zone. President Polk's declaration of war sent to Congress for ratification stated that Mexico "invaded our territory, and shed American blood upon the American soil." Therefore, the United States was responding to an attack on American...

Words: 783 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Business Econ Micro Economics

...Writing Assignment The World Factbook Mexico Economy - overview: Mexico is democratic country with a capitalistic economy or free market economy. It has plenty of natural resources and developing companies primarily own by the private sector it contains a combination of modern and outmoded industry and agriculture. Current management has increase competition in railroads, electricity generation, seaports, airports, natural gas distribution and telecommunication. The distribution of the income inside the country remains unstable. Regarding the free trade agreements, Mexico has with over fifty countries including Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, the European Free Trade Area, and Japan putting more than 90% of trade under free agreements. In July 2012 Mexico joined the pacific alliance with Chile, Peru and Colombia. The presidents Felipe Calderon productively pass pension and fiscal reforms in 2007. As the worlds demand for exports dropped Mexico’s GDP plunged 6.22% in 2009 asset prices dropped and so do remittances and investment. In 2010 the GDP growth was positive by 5.6% with exports, particularly by the United States, Leading the way. In 2011 growth slowed to 3.9% and recover to 4%. In 2012 Mexico’s legislature passed a labor reform which was signed into law by President Felipe Calderon by November. The new pact for Mexico was signed by the new president, Enrique Pena Nieto, along with the leaders of the country's three main political parties: the Institutional Revolutionary...

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mexican Immigration 19th Century

...Mexican immigration was stagnant until the late 1800s; restrictive immigration laws were set in place which resulted in a decline in Asian labor, so the U.S. looked to Mexico to fill the manual labor void. Western expansion demanded labor in several industries including mining, agriculture, construction and transportation (particularly railroad construction and maintenance.) While major railways were constructed over 60 percent of all crews were Mexican. The developing areas of northern Mexico and southwestern U.S. drew many towards the border and encouraged immigration. By 1900 U.S. over 100,000 Mexicans had come into the U.S. After the Mexican Revolution, occurring a decade later, thousands of people traveled across the border due...

Words: 490 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Write An Essay About Moving To Mexico

...It feels like it’s been forever since I last wrote you! We have a lot to catch up on since I moved to Mexico two months ago. I know you don’t like long, boring letters, so I’ll try to stick to the basics. There are a lot of unique landforms here. We live kind of on the Southern Pacific coast, around the Sierra Madre del Sur mountain range. Them along with the ocean make for a beautiful view to wake up to every morning. Plus, they’re way way way bigger in person! Remember when we used to draw pictures of mountains as kids? Well, our proportions were way off because in real life, they’re absolutely ginormous! But besides the mountains, the land is really good for farming. There are a few plantations and latifundios in this area that sell lots of cash crops. But only a couple hours away from where we live, there are more family and community owned farms like ejidos....

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

World War 11 Insight in Mexico and United States

...Insight in Mexico and United States Name Course Instructor Date of submission World War 11 Insight The Second World War occurred between the years 1939 to 1945. Second World War was a sharp reversal for the history of Chicano. It was a new dawn where there was desperation. The depression had left population decline, hopeless communities, broken dreams, the war brought high population, rejuvenated hopes and uprising society. There was a great labor shortage due to the war and great industrial expansion. The Chicanos could get entry into jobs due to the increased demand for the military officers. The move opened ways for the Chicanos; they left their traditional economic activities and were employed in the army and the industries that had been closed up to them previously. Due to labor shortage experienced, it caused the US to turn to Mexico; there was a great need for laborers who would work for the Americans. This was the cause for the formulation of the bracero program. On august 4 1942, the US and Mexicans instituted a bracero program. The bracero program is believed to have the development of rich American agricultural industry. More than four million Mexican laborers came to work in the field of this nation. The bracero converted the American agricultural fields into the most productive in America. These farmers were experienced and very hardworking despite two million of them dying during the Mexican revolution of 1910. There...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cultural Communication in Mexico

...Communication and Culture in Mexico Background Information on Mexico A. Brief History Mexico is situated in the southern part of mainland North America, bordered by the United States in the North, and Belize and Guatemala towards the South. Mexico was conquered and colonized by Spain in the early 16th century and is home to various Amerindian civilizations such as the Maya and Aztec tribes. Administered as the Viceroyalty of New Spain for three centuries, it achieved its independence early in the 19th century. The elections held in 2000 marked the first time since the 1910 Mexican Revolution that an opposition candidate - Vicente FOX of the National Action Party (PAN) - defeated the party in government, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). Another PAN candidate Felipe CALDERON succeeded him in 2006, but the PRI regained the presidency in 2012. B. Religious and Cultural Background The word “Mexico” is derived from Mexica, the name for the indigenous group also known as the Aztecs. Aside from this, Mexicans have several cultural subdivisions within the nation, most commonly identifying themselves as Northern, Central and South/South-Eastern Mexico. The extensive, desertlike north was only sparsely populated until the middle of the twentieth century - but the more densely populated central and western Mexico is the cradle of the nation. This is where highly developed Indian cultures populated the region in pre-Columbian times and was the heart of the colony...

Words: 4946 - Pages: 20