...UPON WAKING UP 1. 1st 5mins upon waking up look just stare at your dreams in your dream board. 2. Visualize it. Be very detailed. From the smell, texture, sounds you hear, how it feel. Just feel it as if it is already yours, and as if it is already now happening. 3. Affirmations. Affirm it, verbalize it as if it is you and is already happening. Claim it. The more loudly you verbalize, the more you feel it, the more effective the affirmation is. NETWORKER’S AFFIRMATION 1. My Pr1mera business is now growing and expanding every day. Business is booming. 2. I am meeting new people everyday who want to create their own online business. 3. I am now having a blast teaching and training others how to build their own business. 4. I am creating awareness about Pr1mera and network marketing every day. 5. Every business action I take enhances and expands every area of my life. 6. I now inspire people to pursue personal freedom in every area of their lives. 7. My team is now growing and expanding all around the world every day. 8. I now have 10 qualifying PRIME ACHEIVER each legs and is now growing and expanding in width and depth of each day. 9. My business now spans across the globe. 10. I am now increasing my wealth and abundance rapidly and easily. 11. I am now offering Pr1mera to prospects with courage and confidence. 12. I am now surrounded by people who are ready, willing, and able to receive my products/service and join...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...Review Questions 1. What are the four levels of verbal response in reflective listening? Answer: Reflective listening is a special type of listening that involves paying respectful attention to the content and feelings expressed in another person’s communication. Reflective listening is hearing and understanding, and then letting the other know that he or she is being heard and understood. The following techniques can be used to increase reflective listening skills: Affirming Contact The receiver affirms contact with the communicator by using simple statements such as “I see,” “uh-huh,” “Yes, I understand”. The purpose of an affirmation response is to communicate attentiveness, not necessarily agreement. Example of affirming responses: - That’s a good suggestion. - I’ve enjoyed talking with you today. Paraphrasing the Expressed After an appropriate time, the receiver might paraphrase the expressed thoughts and feelings of the speaker. Paraphrasing is useful because it reflects back to the speaker the thoughts and feelings as the receiver heard them. This verbal response enables the receiver to build greater empathy, openness, and acceptance into the relationship while ensuring the accuracy of the communication process. Clarifying the Implicit Implicit thoughts and feelings are not clearly or fully expressed. The receiver may or may not assume that the implicit thoughts and feelings are within the awareness of the speaker. Reflecting “Core” Feelings Reflecting core...
Words: 767 - Pages: 4
...In order for a speech to be effective, the speaker must use rhetorical devices that can grab an audience’s attention and help them remember the speech forever. Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy, and Abraham Lincoln have made the most memorable speeches of all time because of the rhetorical devices they used. Reagan (“The Challenger”) used pathos, allusion, and parallelism. Kennedy (“Inaugural Address”) applied antithesis, parallelism, and anaphora. And Lincoln utilized allusion, anaphora, and epistrophe into his speech. Each of these speeches lasted anywhere from a minute to two hours. But in the end, length did not matter; the only thing that mattered is the rhetorical devices these president's used in order to get the nation to listen to them and therefore do what they are told. In Ronald Reagan’s “The Challenger” speech, he uses the rhetorical device pathos, or the appeal to emotion, in order to connect the pain that his family, the entire nation, and the families of those affected by the disaster were feeling. As WordPress.com said, “Reagan uses his delivery, use of dictation, and appeals to pathos to help attempt a nation to recover, eulogize seven men and women, and give a new home to the American people”. About his family and the entire nation, “Nancy and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the Challenger[…]We know we share this pain with all of the people of our county.” (Reagan 1), and about the families of those in the disaster, “For the families of the seven,...
Words: 1533 - Pages: 7
...defendant. In 1914, the Weeks v. United States was when the exclusionary rule was first applied to federal courts. In 1961, the Mapp v. Ohio case made the exclusionary rule mandatory for all states. The U.S. Supreme Court did not make the exclusionary rule mandatory in all states because they wondered if a state conviction denies due process of law that is required by the 14th amendment because evidence admitted at trial would violate the 4th amendment (p. 53). 6) Explain the concept of what constitutes a search by a governmental official. • A search warrant constitutes a search by a governmental official. A neutral and detached magistrate provides a person with a search warrant. Search warrants require a written record under an oath or affirmation. You must have probable cause to obtain a search warrant. You must provide a particular description of the place to be searched, and a particular description of the items to be seized. There must be a specific time and manner of execution (p. 50). ...
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
...There are many different things that can be said about the subject of drug testing welfare recipients. It can be said that it is unfair, and that may be true. It can also be said that it is justifiable, and this may also be true. In this paper I plan to prove that drug testing welfare recipients is unconstitutional, as well as costly to the state administering such test. Testing the recipients can be considered stereotypical and very demeaning. While making sure welfare funds are used properly, it is too costly and does not provide adequate results. In the past ten years drug testing welfare recipients has been a huge issue. While most people are all for it, there are just as many people if not more that are against it. While it may be true that some welfare recipients are doing drugs, all of them are not. It can and will be proven that drug testing these recipients is a waste of time and tax payers’ money. Yes, yours and my hard earned tax dollars are and will be spent on welfare recipients who may or may not be using drugs. Think for a second…what else can my tax dollars be used for? Possible improving badly paved streets. How about fixing that run down playground with the overgrown grass? Maybe the money can even be used toward the remodeling the library of a school. While other states such as Florida have tried testing and been semi-successful other state such as New Hampshire attempt turned out differently. According to Concord Monitor (2013) “while the drug testing was...
Words: 636 - Pages: 3
...Persons, and Beneficence on behalf of the victim. The Right to Privacy for every person means the right to be free from intrusions into ones physical body, space, mind and personal information. This includes the right to be free from bodily restraint in any way or of having to disprove another’s perception of our attire. The Bill of Rights supports the ethical principle, Right to Privacy, specifically with the 14th Amendment, Amendment IV, which covers privacy of the person and possessions with the following: The right of the person to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized. At the very least, even with the “Stand your ground” law, the Sanford Police department had an ethical obligation to arrest George Zimmerman for following, interfering with, and then killing Trayvon Martin. Another ethical principle that was not utilized in this incident, either by Mr. Zimmerman himself or the Sanford Police...
Words: 634 - Pages: 3
...Edmund Chu Dr. Reed ENG 110 May 11, 2015 Assignment #2: Argument Paper The Fourth Amendment guarantees “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The NSA’s surveillance programs violates the Fourth Amendment by collecting telecommunication data and storing it in a database. The US PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the NSA to continue to run these controversial surveillance program today. The United States should end or reform...
Words: 948 - Pages: 4
...7-month-old baby to be "Martin DeShawn McCullough" (Baldacci, 2013). The judge included the last names of both parents however, she left out Messiah. "The word Messiah is a title and it's a title that has only been earned by one person and that one person is Jesus Christ" Judge Ballew said (Baldacci, 2013). Jaleesa responded by saying, "I was shocked. I never intended on naming my son Messiah because it means God and I didn't think a judge could make me change my baby's name because of her religious beliefs" (Baldacci, 2013). When reporters asked the judge about common used name Jesus, she replied “that was not relevant” (Baldacci, 2013). The reliability, credibility and validity of the data. Judges of the United States take oath or affirmation before performing his or hers duties in office. They promise to faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States. They also, instruct juries to decide cases without "prejudice, sympathy, fear, favor or public opinion" (Lavin & DiMichele 2013). In...
Words: 542 - Pages: 3
...joining extracurricular activities. This new program has caused overwhelming controversy among schools, teachers, parents, students, and other officials across the country. The biggest reason for these new found programs may be contributed to recent polls, which have shown an increase in drug use among students. Now many parents, teachers, students, and other officials are for drug testing. However, many are not. One argument against drug testing is that it invades the students privacy. The fourth amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." This was put into place to protect U.S citizens against practices such as random drug testing. Without cause there is no reason to do a random drug test. On the other hand what about a student’s right to an education in a safe and drug free environment? According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse “ marijuana use has increased in 2011 to 7.2% of 8th graders, 17.6% of 10th graders, and 22.6% of 12th graders this is up from 5.7%, 14.2% and 18.8% in 2007.” And according to the U.S. Department of Human Health Services the “Illicit drug use rate among children ages 12-17 has increased from9.3% to 10% from 2008 to 2009.” So must I ask do our...
Words: 643 - Pages: 3
... Julia Raia January 15, 2015 Period: 3 The Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment states that having a warrant is needed to search someone’s belongings. A warrant is a document that is issued by a legal official allowing the police to make an arrest, search belongings, areas, or carry out some other action relating to the administration of justice. It is illegal to search without a warrant. A warrant needs to be signed by a judge to be authorized. If a warrant is not present, the search is not allowed. In order to get a warrant authorized, there needs to be a probable reason that a search is needed. The warrant must be signed only by judges or magistrates. There are many different types of warrants. For example, there are No- Knock Warrants; when the police is given permission to just open the door of a residence. Another type of warrant is a Knock- And- Announce rule where they must announce their presence after they knock. Creating a fake warrant is illegal and it is a crime to forge a judge’s signature. In order to get arrested for possession of drugs or something illegal, there has to be a warrant present if there was a search. Searches are only allowed with a warrant. An arrest is not allowed if there was no warrant with a search. Search and seizure is illegal without a document stating that a search is authorized. Jail time is an option when arrested for possession of illegal substances and for seizure without a warrant....
Words: 638 - Pages: 3
...her based on no more than someone’s anonymous call to a hotline alleging abuse” (Young, par.4). In this article, Young also talks about how children should have the rights to not be searched just like people over the age of 18 without a warrant. This article information directly applies to our class discussion “This case may decide,” says Wexler, “if innocent children have the same rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizures as suspect criminals.” This statement deals with the 4th Amendment, which is “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Schmidt )Wexler feels that if the 4th Amendment protects adults than it should protect children as well. This case about children rights explains to us that...
Words: 362 - Pages: 2
...Amendment IV of the United States Constitution states that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Cornell University). This Amendment refers to people’s right to privacy and freedom in their home from government intrusion and illegal search and seizure. To claim protection under the Fourth Amendment, individuals must show in a court of law expectation of privacy, which is to say an expectation that is recognized as reasonable under the circumstances. Kentucky v. King 563 U.S. 452 (2011) is just one of many cases in which the defendant exercises their rights under the Fourth Amendment. Kentucky v. King 563 U.S. 452 (2011) In the case of Kentucky v. King the Fourth Amendment was the main argument. The courts...
Words: 981 - Pages: 4
...Would an average U.S. citizen feel violated if they were searched without a warrant for their arrest or a requested search? Warrants should always be required before a search is performed. The government should not have the right to search someone without a warrant at all no questions asked. They should stick to what the Constitution strictly says. The fourth amendment should strongly be supported, because of privacy, warrant requirements, and the police searching a suspect’s phone without a warrant. U.S. citizens should definitely be able to have privacy from the government, because Mitt Romney and Rick Perry competed to see who could search and find “illegals” more frequently.(Jonah Engle,2011) Linda Chavez, a conservative commentator who served in the Reagan White House, says,” I am hoping it will shake people up”.(Jonah Engle,2011) Romney and Perry think it is ok and fun to have a little competition about searching “illegals”, but it is not ok when they start to feel violated and then that will draw less votes especially from latinos. The vice president of immigration policy at the Center for American Progress said that the republicans are basically drinking a slow poison.(Jonah Engle,2011) The latinos should not feel violated for little fun and games Romney and Perry are doing, because it could cause them not to vote. When a police officer calls to search a suspect the warrant must comply with Fourth Amendment requirements before any further searching. Probable cause...
Words: 511 - Pages: 3
...WOR KshEET • ChEsT & BACK • DIs C 1 DATE / WEEK Warm-Up (2:30 + 6:30) 01 ChEsT - standard Push-Ups 02 BACK - Wide Front Pull-Ups 03 ChEsT - Military Push-Ups 04 BACK - Reverse Grip Chin-Ups R ___________________ R___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R ___________________ R ___________________ Water Break (0:49) 05 ChEsT - Wide Fly Push-Ups 06 BACK - Closed Grip Overhand Pull-Ups 07 ChEsT - Decline Push-Ups 08 BACK - heavy Pants R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R ___________________ R ___________________ R___________________ R_________W_________ Water Break (0:47) 09 ChEsT - Diamond Push-Ups 10 BACK - Lawnmowers 11 ChEsT - Dive-Bomber Push-Ups 12 BACK - Back Flys R ___________________ R_________W_________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R ___________________ R_________W_________ R___________________ R_________W_________ R...
Words: 1928 - Pages: 8
...A. What are the three things you regret most in your life? How do the events you named relate to counterfactual thinking? Counterfactual thinking – The tendency to imagine other outcomes in a situation than the ones that actually occurred (“What might have been.”) This particular question reminds me of the scenario of what if you marrying your high school sweetheart after you just seen them at a 15 year reunion. This is extremely hard for me to answer because, in relation to the way I live my life, I do not believe in regrets and do not want to take back anything I have done or else I may not be where I am today. I have a very simple philosophy about life and I try not to let my actions whether they are positive or negative, influence the next step I take because every footprint we create is an experience and who is to say that the path we chose is really the right or wrong path and in the end and maybe we were meant to be there. Some may call this fate and of course one can argue the fact that there are defiantly better choices in life than others but I whole heartedly believe that is what shapes our character and personifies the image we leave on this earth. I use the saying “It is what it is” very frequently because that’s how I think. I do not let life push or influence anything I do but I just try to act in best interest of the circumstance that arises and whatever the outcome I will except the results, learn from it, and mold the experience into a stepping stone...
Words: 1647 - Pages: 7
