Free Essay

The Thirty Years War

In:

Submitted By kspk
Words 2817
Pages 12
INTRODUCTION

The Thirty Years’ War was a religious and political war. The first half of the war could be characterized by the religious color and the last half of the war could be characterized by the political color. First of all, it was a religious war between the Catholic and the Protestant on the stage of Germany. Religious interest of both parties surpassed the gravity of the Great Commandment by their LORD. Second, it was a political war between not a few parties. Especially on the latter stage of the Thirty Years’ War, many countries involved drove it into international war. The primary property of the Thirty Years’ War was the long term itself of the war. At first, nobody might have expected that the war would keep going so long a way. If they had known just half of the result of the long period war, many of the participants would have changed their minds. The long term of the Thirty Years’ War left Germany devastated: both the German territory and the life of the German people. It also made foreign participants tired and hurt. As Fletcher indicated, Germany was a miniature of Europe, and the both Europe and Germany were divided into many at the end of the war. And what was worse, the latter was totally devastated: Germany was a rich country when the war began, but she was a desert when the war ended. Here we need to retrospect and ask a question: What was the reason of the war-participants and what did they accomplish? What is the Thirty Years’ War teaching the modern Christian?
CAUSE OF THE THIRTY YEARS’ WAR

At the beginning of the 17th century, the Emperor Rudolph II, was the Archduke of Austria and he was also the King of Bohemia and of Hungary. And the neighboring territories were ruled by his family members. Though Rudolph and his family took all the ruling positions in the Empire, they got some difficulty. Why? For the greater portion of the population belonged to the Protestants. And the fact that the rulers were from the minority meant that they were short of thoughts in common. According to Gonzalez, Rudolph was not trusted from the first, primarily because he had been educated under the Jesuits Ferdinand did not hesitated to put down the Protestantism with a strong hand in his dominions, but Rudolph was not able to follow his example. In 1606, Rudolph was trying to follow his Cousin Ferdinand’s example in dealing with the domestic situation. He tried do suppressed the growing Protestants with power. The result was very expensive. There was a general revolt and Rudolph barely avoided being kicked off with his brother Matthias’ help. In two years, Austria and Hungry were assigned to Matthias. Now bohemia, Moravia and Silesia were left to Rudolph’s hand. In 1609, Rudolph could not but edict the Royal Charter, a Letter of Majesty, which permitted freedom of conscience to every inhabitant of Bohemia. And finally the authority was given over to members of the Estates, that is to say, to 1,400 of the feudal aristocracy and 42 towns. In 1611, Rudolph gave the throne over to Matthias. The new Emperor did his best to evade the effect of the Charter by appointing Catholic priests to Protestant churches. Despite all his effort, the general mood didn’t show a prominent curve. In 1617, the next king Ferdinand took the oath to keep the Royal Charter when he became the king. But the bohemian people soon felt some antagonistic result under his reign. A Protestant assembly was called up. There was a group of men headed by Count Henry of Thurn which was bent on the dethronement of Ferdinand. They wanted to take advantage of the popular felling to effect the murder of the two regents. So they threw out of the window two viceroys of His Royal Majesty (Ferdinand) and highest officers of the Land of Bohemia, shouting: “Now we will take our just revenge on our religious enemies.” “Jesus, Mary!” cried Martinez. “Let us see whether his Mary will help him,” said someone mockingly. This shocking matter, Defenestration of Prague, ignited the Thirty Years’ War. Ten years before the Thirty Years’ War, the Protestants and the Catholics became brave and forgot an important thing, the fact that they themselves were the body of the Christ. Both parties transformed their own religious holy body into a great military group. In 1608, the Protestants formed a union of defense under Palatinate leadership. They made 6 promises. The promises were of unity, secret and defense together. In 1609, the Catholic militants replied with a league under the Duke Maximilian of Bavaria. Their decision was solid. Ten years later, in 1618, the Protestant Union seized their chance to wrest Bohemia from the Catholic Hapsburgs. In 1619, Bavaria and Austria also agreed to drive the Protestants out of Bohemia.

THE THIRTY YEARS OF WAR INTO FOUR STEPS

Thus already inwardly diseased, Germany entered upon a war of thirty years. The Thirty Years’ War was a war Full of Bloody, while battles and glorious victories of each party were so temporal, and then the political situation was soon flipped over.
The First Period of the War – Imperial Triumphs (1618-1630) In 1618, the Protestants of Bohemia refused the Bohemian crown to the Archduke Ferdinand, and chose for their ruler the Elector Palatine, a reformer. Thirty directors were appointed and the Jesuits were expelled from Bohemia. The Diet met and ordered soldiers to be levied to form an army. Bohemia was invaded by the Emperor’s general, Bucquoi. He was under Ferdinand and he got 14,000 soldiers. Bohemian directors needed an urgent help. Charles Emmanuel, Duke of Savoy, agreed to give some help. 2,000 men were tossed with the leader Count Ernest of Mansfeld. Arriving in Bohemia, Mansfeld restored the rebel’s morale by a successful surprise attack on Pilsen, a western Bohemia. Aug. 28, 1619, by means of the League and the Lutheran Electors of Saxony, Ferdinand II became Emperor. The new emperor called on Maximilian of Bavaria and the Catholic League to invade Bohemia. June 3, 1620, Maximilian of Bavaria joined Bucquoi, and entered bohemia. Tilly, Maximilian’s general, at the head of a combined Catholic League and Imperial army, defeated Frederick V’s troops at the battle of the White Mountain, near Prague. Ferdinand regained control of Bohemia and the revolt was at an end. The opponent of Ferdinand II was beaten in the battle of the White Mountain, and fled the country as a fugitive. Here and there, the Protestant opposition continued, but divided without plan and with weak resources. July, 1620, each side agreed at Ulm, Treaty of Ulm, to respect the other’s neutrality in Germany without prejudice to whatever action it might choose to take in Bohemia. But the overall result of the treaty was immeasurably to strengthen the Hapsburgs’ position in Bohemia. Protestant Union dissolved. Frederick V was deposed from the throne and also from the Palatinate. Bohemia was restored to Ferdinand II, and the Palatinate was handed over to Maximilian as a reward for his services, Feb. 13, in 1623. The Protestants could not avoid persecution in Bohemia and in the Palatinate territory. Many Protestant leaders were executed and many people were confiscate of their riches. In Bohemia, especially, there was a chocking decree: By Easter of 1626, any who were not ready to become Catholics must leave the country. According to Gonzalez, the population of Bohemia was estimated to have declined by four-fifths at the end of the Thirty Years’ War. The victory of Ferdinand II and his general Maximilian means the growth of the Hapsburg. In the battle field of the greed people, whether they were pious or not, it might have been difficult to find a man who would resemble Christ’s example and yield his own benefit. Instead there were not a few men who were interested in the changing international order. Richelieu of France was one of the men. He came to power as the chief minister of the French King, Lewis XIII in 1624. As far as German matters are concerned, the only interest of Lewis XIII was to look for a way to lessen the power of the Hapsburg. So the strong Catholic Lewis XIII ironically assisted the Protestants. Even for that he made peace with Huguenots in France. In 1625, backed up by the 2,000 French horse and 12,000 English foot, Mansfeld tried to reach the Palatinate but failed.
The Second Period of the War – Danish Intervention (1625-1630) In 1625, another international move came to pass. England, the Netherlands, and Denmark joined in a Protestant League. And the League proposed to invade Germany and restore Frederick, who was a son-in-law of James I of England, to his lands in the Palatinate. They also had the support of several German Protestant princes. The Protestant princes, now a minority in the council and threatened by the emperor’s success, looked around for allies. King Christian IV of Denmark came forward, with English subsidies. Now the war became the European war. Behind the scenes France encouraged the Danish King. Here too, behind the scene was the influential French statesman Cardinal Richelieu, who sought to stir up trouble for the Hapsburgs. However, none of these military or diplomatic counter-moves were so successful. Meanwhile, Ferdinand II didn’t want to depend on the Maximilian any longer. He was interested in having his own military. He made it by obtaining a large body of troops through the assistance of an experienced mercenary commander, Wallenstein. He maintained the general Wallenstein in his territory by contribution and pillage. When Christian IV, the Denmark king, came to fight in German, Wallenstein was such a splendid warrior that the competition was not easily over. At the same time Christian IV should contend with Maximilian. In four year long struggle, May 21 1629 losing the cause to recover the Palatinate, the Denmark king signed the Peace of Lubeck and went back home. Just as Gonzalez pointed out, what the intervention of Christian IV left to the German people was nothing but suffering.

The Third Period of the War – Swedish Intervention (1630-1634) Sweden and England were to be the two champions of Protestantism. Both of the countries thought of their faith as a matter of political necessity or convenience. Gustavus Adolphus, the founder of his dynasty, was not a very religious man; he had determined to make Sweden a Lutheran country for two main reasons: Church and Crown. Primarily he wanted to enrich the lands of the Church and the power of the Crown. Christian IV’s time-killing invading showed Richelieu that his efforts were inadequate. Now he looked for another partner and at last he found a new adversary against the emperor; Gustavus adolphus, King of Sweden. The promise of suitable subsidies persuaded him to enter the field in 1631. Gustavus’ well-trained troops roamed across Germany sweeping the imperial armies before them, and reached the Rhine. Two reasons Gonzalez pointed for Gustavus’ coming into the German territory were not different from those other participants showed. Faith & Pride! One was to defend the Protestants and the other was to defeat the ambitions of the Hapsburg. At first, when Gustavus invaded northern Germany, he was not welcomed by his fellow Lutherans. But after Magdeburg, the Swede’s allied city, was destroyed by an Imperial army, the Protestants grew concerned and began to arm. When the Imperial forces moved against Saxony, the Elector of Saxony came over to the Swedes. The Swedish army of Gustavus met the Imperials under Tilly at Breitenfeld near Leipzing and totally destroyed them. Gustavus kept marching toward the Rhine. On the base of Rhine, he continued to go to Mentz. In spite of the objections of the French, the brave Gustavus attacked Bavaria. On the passage of the Lech, Tilly was defeated again and mortally wounded. On May 17, 1632, Gustavus entered Munich. Wallenstein offered peace, but Gustavus did not approve of the terms of it. And they finally opposed at Neremburg, in June, 1632. And the last day of Gustavus’ life arrived with the cold wind on the battle field of Lutzen. But the victory of the Lutzen battle was of the Swedes. There was a peace negotiation between Wallenstein and Saxony. In the process of negotiation, according to Samuel L. Gardiner, there was a conflict between Wallenstein and the Emperor, for Wallenstein tried to make peace with Gustavus, apart from Ferdinand II. In Feb. 25, 1634, Wallenstein was declared a traitor and assassinated by the emperor who feared Wallenstein’s power and concerned about his intrigues with hostile powers. In 1635, when the most splendid two general, Gustavus and Wallenstein, the long-expected peace was made between Ferdinand II and Saxony in May. And the peace of Prague was read:
However, concerning the ecclesiastical lands and properties that were territorial states in their own right, and that were secularized before the agreement at Passau, as well as all those ecclesiastical lands and properties that have fallen into the hands of members of the Augusburg Confession after the conclusion of the Passau agreement, whether they lay within territorial state jurisdiction or were territorial states in their own right, we have finally agreed that those Electors and Imperial Estates who held these lands on 12 November 1627, new style, shall have complete and free control of the same for a period of forty years from the date of this concluded agreement. And any authority that has been deprived of such lands since 12 November 1627 shall have them returned, yet without any right to claim costs or damages.

The Fourth Period of the War – French Intervention (1634-1648) After crushing all his domestic enemies in France, Richelieu finally intervened the matter in Germany. On the grounds that the balance of power in Europe was in danger, he gathered around him a host of allies, including the German Protestant princes. In 1635 he crossed over into the neighboring territory. Gradually the Imperial forces were weakened. At his attack into Alsace and the Hapsburg coalition began to totter. France took control not only of Alsace and but also of the Rhineland, while the Swedes took over or neutralized northern Germany and carried the war into Bohemia. Peace was in the air. Finally the emperor agreed to sign the peace after a little more time and the memorable victories of Turenne in Alsace and the Palatinate. The negotiations which opened at Munster and Osnabruck in 1644 dragged painfully on for four years. On 24 October, 1648, the Peace of Westphalia was signed, ending the long suffering consuming Thirty Years War. The Swedes received a large cash indemnity and control over the Baltic and the North Sea: western Pomerania, Bremen and Verden. The French received rights over Alsace. The control of the Emperor over the German territorial rulers was reduced to a nullity

CONCLUSION

The religious conflict which ignited the Thirty Years’ War was accompanied with the conviction of the truth from both perspectives of the Catholic and Protestant. The conviction of the truth gave a great encouragement to the people of the war. And the great encouragement made them armed with weapons. Knowing that the violence and weapons are contrary to the love of Christ, they were convinced of the truth so absolutely that their conviction led them to go beyond the love commandment of Christ. The Thirty Years’ war showed an example that the dogmatic encouragement surpassed another truth, the love of Christ. Like this, in a moment when an action intended to defend a dogmatic truth is threatening the other truth, the love of Christ, people of God need to take a time and tolerate. Christian needs a Dogmatic Humiliation. If only it is mild, is any way ok? No. The people of God cannot accept or compromise with everybody. Christian must stand upon the truth. The people of Christ should have an evident basis for our faith. But upon the firmness of the basic elements of the truth, they need to tolerate each other.

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Benecke, Gerhard, Germany in the Thirty Years War, New York: St. Martins Press, 1979.

Daniel-Rops, Henri, The History in the seventeenth Century, New York: E. P. Dutton & Co. Inc., 1916.

Fletcher, C. R. L., Gustavux Adolphus, New York: Capricorn Books, 1963.

Freytag, Gustav, The German Catastrophe, ed. by Theodore K. Rabb, The Thirty Years’ War, Lexington: D. D. Heath and Company, 1972.

Gardiner, Samuel Rawson, Thirty Years’ War, ed. by Edward E. Morris, Epochs of History, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1921.

Gonzalez, Justo L., The Story of Christianity, vol.2, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1985.

Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, New York: Random House, 1987.

Maland, David, Europe at War 1600-1650, Totowa: Roman and Littlefield, 1980.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Mother Courage and Her Children and Love in the Time of Cholera

...relationships with loved ones, in the novel a thwarted relationship leads the main character to develop dual unhealthy relationships with women. The first sees him obsessed with his lost first love and the second is a sexual addiction spanning more than 600 ‘conquests’. Whilst Mother Courage and Florentino are both driven by obsession, these vary in their focus. Mother Courage lives in the time of the Thirty Years war and runs her own cart selling wares to the armies to survive and support her children. This business and the pursuit of money becomes an obsession for her. On page 73, Scene 9 Mother Courage declares: “Sometimes I sees meself driving through hell with me cart selling brimstone, or across heaven with packed lunches for hungry souls. Give me my kids what’s left...” This line juxtaposes the images of heaven and hell and brings to the readers mind a well-used phrase that people use to emphasise their dedication to a task, ie “I’d drive through heaven or hell...”. Whilst it becomes apparent to the reader that Mother Courage is obsessed with making money from the war, in Love in the time of Cholera Florentino’s obsession is with his lost first love, Fermina. This is evidenced in Chapter 2 …………….. where he observes: “Fermina Daza seemed different without the school uniform, for she wore a narrow tunic with many folds that fell from her shoulders in the Greek style, and on her head she wore a garland of fresh gardenias that made her look like a crowned goddess...

Words: 1341 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Chapter 15 Vocab

...European Expansion and Religious Wars Pages 489-524 1. 2. Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis 3. Gunpowder’s contribution to the nature of war in the 16th century 4. Frances I & Henry II of France’s domestic policies 5. The nobility of the robe 6. Result of the Concordat of Bologna 7. Why Calvinism took hold in France 8. The sons of Henry II 9. The root of French religious violence 10. Saint Bartholemew's Day Massacre 11. The War of the Three Henrys 12. Politiques 13. Henry of Navarre 14. Edict of Nantes 15. the economic importance of the Netherlands 16. political history of the Netherlands (17 provinces) 17. Charles V’s abdication & the division of his lands between brother and son 18. Why Calvinism took root in the Netherlands 19. Margaret, regent of the Netherlands 20. The cathedral of Notre Dame of Antwerp 21. Duke of Alva 22. Prince William of Orange 23. Alexander Farnese, Duke of Parma 24. Union of Utrecht 25. Why Elizabeth came to the aid of the Protestant Netherlands (Page 496) 26. The Escorial 27. Philip II (make sure and read his political, religious background) 28. Philip’s “British problem” 29. Spanish Armada 30. Results of the defeat of the Armada for both Spain and England 31. Lutheranism, Calvinism and German bishoprics 32. Protestant Union vs. Catholic League 33. Four Phases of the Thirty Years’ War a. Bohemian Phase (Defenestration...

Words: 515 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Wester Way of War

...WESTERN WAY OF WAR (Name) (Institutional Affiliation) (Date) Warfare plays different roles. It is at times used as a way through which large empires are built. Civil war as another form of warfare is, on the other hand, what leads to the downfall of the empires. All societies and all historical periods have experienced war at one point in time. Different nations or militaries use diverse war approaches and tactics depending on their experiences and goals. Over time, different war approaches have been utilized by various regions across the globe. The Western Way of War has been instrumental in ensuring the long-standing dominance of the western nations all over the globe. In the last two centuries, it has turned out to be the prevailed and used by majority of the globes militaries. The ‘Western Way’ is defined by five main facets, namely: dependence on technological advancement, advanced training and discipline, capability to implement new technological innovations (innovativeness) and strategic vision. These aspects have been attributed to the supremacy of the western culture. A pioneer of war is Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden.1 He is highly regarded as an exceptional commander. Under his tenure, Sweden became very powerful, and his battles were won through innovativeness, superb and effective weaponry, impeccable training and government support.2 Gustavus Adolphus is arguably one of the highly respected generals owing to his outstanding military expeditions during his era...

Words: 1298 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Fall of Spanish Empire in the 17th Century

...KEY POINTS LEADING TO THE SPANISH EMPIRE’S DECLINE AND FALL IN THE SEVENTEETH CENTURY CHRISTINE NILSON 24 December 2011 1 KEY POINTS LEADING TO THE SPANISH EMPIRE’S DECLINE AND FALL IN THE SEVENTEETH CENTURY The Spanish Empire of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries has a story of irresponsible, selfish and foolish policies. The major problems revolved around their failure to build their internal economy, the ever increasing unsolved debts, and dependence on colonial silver. These problems were aggravated by other world events that they could not control. The empire best period was called Spain’s Golden Age. This occurred approximately between 1516 and 16591, although historians frequently list various time spans. Spain’s monarchs in this period claimed God had chosen them to rule over all decisions. Generally they ignored the country’s constitution that could limit their power. Other governing bodies existed, but the king had the final say.2 The empire controlled lands in areas of north and south central Europe from the Netherlands to the islands at the tip of Italy. They controlled colonies in many parts of America including Peru, Central America, various islands and Mexico.3 Eventually, they took over Portugal and its African and Asian colonies along with their trade routes.2 One kings just before the decline, Charles V, had the title of Holy Roman Emperor.4 Spain had little internal means to produce income. The general population took a light view of seeking...

Words: 1135 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Dsadsad

...niya ang Edict of Nantes upang ang mga digmaan sanhi ng relihiyon na nagbibigay sa mga Huguenot ng kalayaan sa pagsamba at pantay na karapatan pulitikal na tinatamasa ng mga Katoliko. Louis XIII * Muling nalugmok ang France sa kaguluhan ngunit hindi madaling nagupo ang pundasyong itinatag ni Henry IV. Para maipagpatuloy ang panuntunan ng kanyang aman, pinili niya si Richelieu bilang Punong Ministro. Richelieu * May 2 siyang layunin ang gawing makapangyarihan at maging pangunahin lakas ito sa Europe * Pinalakas ang pamahalaan local at nagatas ng mga mangangasiwa na tinatawag na intendants, sa maikling panahon lubos na nakontrol ng intendants ang local na pamahalaan Thirty Years Wars * Sa paghangad ng france na pigilan ang dominasyon ng mga Hapsburg sa Europe pumasok ito sa thirty years wars. Nang tila magwakas na ang digmaan biglang sumanib ang France sa protestante ang france at mga kaalyansa nito ay nagtagumpay. Winakasan ng Kasunduan sa Westphalia ang digmaan. Ang kinilalang makapangyarihang estado pagkatapos ng digmaan ay france Kasunduan sa Westphalia * Ang naging pangunahing bunga ng digmaan ay ang pagangat ng france bilang pangunahing kapangyarihan sa Europe at paghina ng Hapsburg sa Germany at Spain. Humina ang kanilang emperador. Patakarang military ni Louis XIV May nagawang mali si Louis XIV na naghakbang sa paghina ng france. Inakala niya na hindi tapat at mapanganib ang mga Huguenot kaya pinawalang-bisa niya ang Edict of Nantes na nagbigay ng...

Words: 675 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

30 Years War

...fight for dominance power and land has been the main cause of war. The 30 years war, named after its length of war during 1618 to 1648 is the only war that was solely fought for religious reasons between European powers of that era. The thirty years was is considered a religious war because the growth increase in religious intolerance and religious rivalries which led to be the sole cause of the war but as the war progressed it became less about religion and more about territory and dynastic issues. Previous to the 30 years’ war the Holy Roman Empire was facing a large hold of its catholic followers; the church had begun to decline due to scandals inside of the church. In 1555 peace of Augsburg became recognized as the first treaty indicating that the leader of the Holy Roman Empire could determine the religion of its people it ruled , this was a tactic to reestablish and re enforce the catholic church and weaken the protestant and Lutheran church. This lead to the 30 years’ war, a time where political differences and fight for religious freedom where fought. During the time of the 30 years war, it faced four different stages during its time. This four eras of the war where the...

Words: 1940 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Uuihhk Hjkjh

...Historical Terms and Concepts to Know *Who, what, where, why, when, how, so what? Martin Luther Henry VIII Council of Trent Thirty Years’ War Protestant Siege of Vienna Glorious Revolution Peter I St. Petersburg Ninety-Five Theses missionary Society of Jesus Treaty of Westphalia Charles V Spanish Inquisition Louis XIV Versailles Catherine II balance of power Adam Smith VOC Ptolemaic universe Newton John Locke capitalism joint-stock companies putting-out system Copernican universe deism Discussion Questions Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the idea behind the balance of power. How did this concept play itself out in Europe? How was this balance of power different from the political patterns in the rest of the world? Examine the career of Martin Luther. What were the foundations of his Reformation? What legacy did he leave Europe? Why did earlier reformers not have the same impact? Examine the rise of capitalist thought and...

Words: 516 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Was There A Turning Point In European History Essay

...when the Thirty Years War ends and Europe recovers from the War. The Peace of Westphalia extended the recognition of Lutheranism and also legalized Calvinism, not only taking away reason to fight over religion, but also taking away the Holy Roman Empire’s ability to dictate religious beliefs throughout Europe. Politically, the Catholic Church loses a lot of influence, likewise to the Holy Roman Empire losing a lot of power when other countries started to take over, especially as France started to emerge. When the treaties of the Peace of Westphalia were signed, Europe brought back the religious peace between Europe. This allowed German princes to govern their territory, and...

Words: 616 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

This Things

...of factors. First, the major factors that aided in shift of the decline. What effect did the “Thirty Year War’ have on the overall decline of European Christianity. What effect did “The Thirty Year War” have concerning religious commitment and civil and political concerning life? Then I will focus on other factors that brought Europeans Christianity to the point that it came to in the past, and look at other factors as well. Finally, I will paint a clear picture as to the effect of all the concerns that I have taken place (years of war), and look to see the positive and the negative effect all the different changes has brought. Wars of Religion These wars set the stage regarding the progress and the decline regarding Christianity, one would think that this form of action (War) would somehow aid in the advancement of Christianity (this not the case). Then religious values were regarded as of primary concern. The great thinkers on political and economic subjects usually based their ideas on religious principles. The major wars were Wars of Religion.[1] As we read from the above statement, the religious values are a major concern, even to the point that war would breakout. So it is of these values that war wages forth, but the wars that should have aided in bringing the thought of religious ideas, has brought about “The war of Religion”. It was thought that through these wars...

Words: 1681 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Nation-State

...RISE OF THE NATION STATE State, Nation, and Nation-state The present-day layout of the world’s political map is a product of humanities endless politico-geographic accommodations and adjustments. A mosaic of more than 200 states and territories separated by boundaries makes the world looks like a jigsaw puzzle. Human territoriality refers to a country’s (or more local community’s) sense of property and attachment toward its territory, expressed by its determination to keep it inviolable and defended. A state is a politically organized territory, administered by a government, and recognized by the international community. A state must also contain a permanent population, an organized economy, and a functioning internal circulation system (infrastructure). Since certain countries have internal divisions, the solution is to capitalize “State” (e.g. State of Florida, State of Uttar Pradesh India)). When used for the formally independent political units, the term country and state are interchangeable. A nation, by contrast, is a tightly knit group of people possessing bonds of language, religion, ethnicity, and/or other shared cultural attributes. Theoretically, a nation-state is a recognized country possessing formal sovereignty and occupied by a people who see themselves as a single, united nation. In only a handful of countries do state territories largely coincide with the distribution of people who feel they are part of one nation. Iceland, Portugal, Denmark, and Poland are...

Words: 2992 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Treaty of Westphalia

...The Thirty Year’s War in Europe lasted from 1618 until 1648, and consisted of four phases: The Bohemian phase from 1618 to 1625, the Danish phase 1625 to 1629, the Swedish phase 1630 to 1635, and the French phase 1635 to 1648. As the war went on Europe, so tired of the devastation, began crying for peace. Though the Spanish and French would fight another eleven years, until 1659, the Thirty Year’s War officially ended with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648 which changed not only borders on maps, it was also the death blow to the Counter Reformation, ushering in a new era of secularization. Though peace talks began in 1644 in Munster and Osnabruck, the actual signing of the Treaty of Westphalia occurred in 1648. The council was the largest assembly of Europeans since the council at Constance in 1414. The accomplishments of the treaty were that it divided the Holy Roman Empire in such a way that it existed in name only after negotiations. Borderlands of the Empire fell away as the Dutch and Swiss ceased to belong to it and the United Provinces and Swiss Cantons were recognized as independent. Other outlying areas were also acquired by the Empire’s French and Swedish neighbors. Another change was that both Catholics and Protestants were allowed to coexist within the new “Holy Roman Empire,” creating a polyglot community of independent, sovereign states. An overarching theme also emerged with the treaty, and it was a theme of balancing power. Surrounding countries knew that in...

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

What Did Louis Xiv Hope to Accomplish in His Domestic and Foreign Policies in France?

...Maritime Code was introduced in 1672 and a Commercial Code in 1673. C. To enforce his rule, Louis needed a large army. By the time of his death in 1715, the army of France stood at 350,000. Not only was it large in size, but it was also a modern army completely controlled by the state. Such an army ensured that the people were well controlled within France. Any hint of rebellion could be suitably dealt with. The army was answerable to the Secretary of State for War and the Intendants who worked for him. D. The credit for finding the modern French Navy went to Jean-Baptiste Colbert. In 1643, at the start of Louis’s reign, France had about three serviceable naval boats. For Colbert, this represented a weakness that other nations might exploit. Therefore, a great deal of time and effort went into developing a modern navy. This allowed France to follow an aggressive expansionist policy in both colonisation and commerce. Both added to the wealth and prestige of France. E. The economy relatively prospered in the early years of Louis’ reign. Under the guidance of Colbert, the French economy did well. Colbert realised the importance of a sound commercial...

Words: 1166 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Asfsdfasdfsdfsd

...People | Countries/Lands | Time Periods | Terms | Description | Catherine the Great | Russian Empire | 1750s-1800s | Russo-Turkish/Russo-Persian Wars, Pretenders, Royal Marks | Catherine the Great was queen of the Russian Empire alongside her husband, Peter III | Issac Newton | England | 1640s-1730s | Newton's Three Laws, the Invention of Calculus | Issac Newton was the physicist who discovered gravity and created calculus | Robespierre | France | 1750-1800s | Reign of Terror, Jacobin Club | Robespierre was the leading figure in the French Revolution Reign of Terror | Elizabeth I | England | 1550s-1600s | Spanish Armada | Elizabeth I was the last queen of the Tudor dynasty, and she stopped the Spanish Empire. | Louis XIV | France | 1640s-1720s | Edict of Nandes, League of Augsburg, War of Spanish Succession, Treaty of Ryswick | Louis XIV was the "Sun King", the king of the French Empire and longest monarch ever | Peter the Great | Russian Empire | 1670s-1730s | Great Northern War | Peter the Great was the monarch of Russia who modernized it to eventual Russian power | John Locke | England | 1630s-1700s | Social Contract Theory, Lockean Proviso, Two Treatises | John Locke was an English philosopher considered one of the greatest Enlightened thinkers. | Mary and William Stuart | England | 1640s-1650s | House of Stuart, Glorious Revolution | William and Mary Stuart were protestant english monarchs in their time, against catholicism. | Voltaire | France | 1690s-1780s...

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Did a Revolution Happen During the Mid-17th Century?

...The English Revolution was a period of armed conflict and political turmoil between 1642 and 1660. This included the execution of the Charles 1st, the rise of the Commonwealth followed by the Protectorate under Cromwell and then the eventual restoration of the Monarchy. Richardson is correct to state that the events that occurred were “inherently controversial… momentous and far reaching” which are still debated today. This debate rages on whether these events can constitute a Revolution. It is dependent on what definition of the word Revolution is enacted. Historians such as Jeff Goodwin provide interpretations of what it means to have a Revolution, which shall be further explored, however what ultimately accounts is how the events and interpretations of the time fit into these interpretations. Ultimately there are two ways to look at Revolution, firstly there is the struggle or initial violent uprisings of the populous against the established state. The other way of looking at a revolution is to also examine the more long term changes or effects in the mind-set of the contemporise. In other words the changes in the way men think. Richardson pushes the idea of the initial struggle constituting a Revolution whereas others such as Hill believe that the long-term effects are more significant. Both arguments both valid against differing definitions of Revolution. Similarities between the French and English Revolutions will also provide a stark comparison of the English situation...

Words: 3214 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

History a Level

...How successfully did James I deal with the problems he inherited James had to deal with major inherited problems such a lack of substantial income, religious divide the three main religious factions; Armenians, Catholics and Protestants, James also inherited a weak foreign policy plagued by war. James inherited from Elizabeth I both a substantial debt of around four hundred and twenty thousand pounds, a crown suffering from the effects of serous long-term under-funding, and a lack of a substantial lack of income due to selling of crown estates. It would not be right to describe James’s financial worries as a small factor in his list of his problems, however, it cannot be seen as the unsolvable problem that many people describe it to be. If one takes into account the fact that the three hundred thousand pounds that Parliament had recently voted Elizabeth had not yet been received at the time of her death, and that another hundred thousand pounds. of the money owed had been collected in the late 1590s as forced loans which nobody realistically expected the crown to repay, it could be argued that Elizabeth died leaving England in not a too bad financial situation as people normally describe. In addition, the effect of the lack of crown estates problem would not be felt in the first reign after Elizabeth’s because James also continued in the practice of selling off royal lands for quick injections of capital thus the problem of a lack of income was negated by this. However, despite...

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5